Komentari na prvi clanak! - #660 - #720....

 

 

  1. Anon[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @Zeidner
     

    You wanna see bad to worse , take a look at a photo of Ron Unz 10 years ago and then take a look at a recent one . He is 57 but looks 75 and deranged like a mad hatter. Its quite jarring really. May explain a lot .

    Also you gotta believe that when the Ayatollahs fall and audits and accounting take place , we are going to see exactly which westerners were on the payroll of that terror regime. Also the survivors are going to sing like canaries. Giraldi deleted my comment alluding to it but someone partially quoted it and they neglected to erase that.

    • Troll: renfro
    • Replies: @Zeidner
     
  2. ivan says:
    @j2
     

    I respect your knowledge about these things, but without referring again to the Bible, I can recall that Yahweh, ordered that the blood of a slaughtered animal be poured on the ground, since ‘the blood is the life of the animal, and life belongs to Him alone.’ I don’t see how such an absolute prohibition can be circumvented except by a lot of hand-waving.

    • Replies: @j2
     
  3. @Anon
     

    Yeah. I got the memo. And I understand the policy. And the problem is just that I forgot the one time. And I’ve already taken care of it so it’s not even really a problem anymore.

     
  4. ivan says:
    @Anon
     

    Precisely because they cannot eat the material form of the Body and Blood of Christ, they eat it in the form of bread and wine. I do this every week (but unfortunately there is no wine served to parishioners at Catholic masses.)

    Who eats whom pretty much determines the power relationship in an ecosystem; marks out the apex predator. The killer whale in the seas, the lion in the savannah, the crocodile in the rivers, the boss in a chain gang, the exploitative capitalist in an economy. Primitive man understood this. He tried propitiating the gods with sacrifices, to weather gods, to tree gods, to gods of fortune and the like. What was the thinking behind this? Nothing but this: eat this lamb or dove or pig O god instead of me. Spare me, O apex predator.

    But Christ, whom Christians believe to be the Word of God Himself, reversed the accepted order of sacrifice, offered Himself in place of all, and thus redeemed the lowliest of mankind.

    • Replies: @Anon
     
  5. KSA says:

    The Jewish religion emerged as an inversion of Egyptian polytheism. Whatever the Egyptians worshiped, the Jews mocked, and whatever the Egyptians scorned, the Jews made holy.

    Judaism is parody religion like Satanism (founded by a Jew as well) and the Jews themselves are simply a race of wandering parasites who embed themselves in a host society and use the same tactic of normative inversion to upend society and bring it to ruin for their own benefit.

    What is particularly sinister about Jews is their sadistic nature. Jews on social media for the past few weeks have been openly celebrating their murder of the Russian Royal Family, a family which, by the way, actually protected and privileged Jews in Russia, contrary to what Jews claim.

    The problem with we Whites is that we’ve always been too nice to Jews. If we kick them out of our countries for the crimes they commit against us they scream persecution, then come back in and murder us. If we help them, they invent crimes we never committed against them (The Tsars and the “pogroms”) and murder us anyway.

    • Replies: @Anonym
     
    @jilles dykstra
     
  6. KSA says:
    @Reisen
     

    “The Jewish Century” by Jewish author Yuri Zleskine. It not only confirms Jewish control of the USSR but gloats about it. It’s pointless to deny that Bolshevism was a Jewish terrorist movement, and later, despotic government bent on the destruction of Europe.

     
  7. ivan says:
    @Jeff Stryker
     

    And botched up big time in that enterprise. Face it no German of that era knew how to rule foreign peoples, unlike the British and the French, for ‘they are either at your throat or at your feet.’

     
  8. Talha says:
    @annamaria
     

    Cute!!! Thanks!

    Peace.

     
  9. @Jus' Sayin'...
     

    Sounds like Mueller’s Witch Hunt.

    • Replies: @Jus' Sayin'...
     
  10. Anon[360] • Disclaimer says:

    What does this make Islam and Christianity? Founded out of a parody religion and recycling the same parody themes and the same parody characters and parody prophets from Judaism ?

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
     
    @Jared Eliot
     
  11. NYCTexan says:
    @Anonym
     

    Well France had the Vichy regime. I’m far from an expert on Vichy France and how much raping went on there, but my sense is the set of circumstances surrounding that regime is strong indication that many more French sympathized with Germany than other cases. Perhaps this Vichyated the need for rape (see what I did there?)

    As to why the Palestinians were killed then in that area… honestly, I think it is simply that war brings out the worst in men. They do not consider consequences of their actions, and certainly not whether the other side might regain the upper hand some day.

     
  12. @Anon
     

    So you hate everybody? Including yourself?

    • Replies: @Anon
     
  13. Not only are you are traitor to both Jews and America, but your reason for betraying the Jews is the stupidest I’ve ever heard. The First Lebanon War? Really? Sheesh.

    Then don’t write an article endorsing them.

    Every believing Jew is obligated to celebrate the glorious Sabra and Shatila massacre, but it is wrong for Jews to take credit. It was a colossal screw up by the IDF and anybody who says otherwise is in “moon landing was faked” territory.

    Possibly the falsest statement ever written on Unz.com, which is saying a lot.

    There is very little mysticism in the Talmud.

    False.

    False.

    Except our curses work. We got both Rabin and Sharon with the Pulsa Denura.

    Goyim is a totally neutral term, it is not derogatory.

    • LOL: Them Guys
    • Replies: @Pat Hannagan
     
    @iffen
     
    @utu
     
    @Yevardian
     
  14. @James N. Kennett
     

    So you wouldn’t mind in the least if Israel were completely liquidated, would you?

    • Replies: @Zeidner
     
    @James N. Kennett
     
  15. Anon[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @ploni almoni
     

    No , I said nothing of the sort. Perhaps you mistake me for the descendants of Ishamael. Here is a prophesy from the old testament that has been thoroughly fullfilled :

    Genesis 16 : 12
    He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone (including himself)and everyone’s hand(including his own hand) against him, and he will live in hostility toward all his brothers.”

     
  16. Mr. Anon says:
    @Tyrion 2
     

    No. My point was that “seething hatred” is not incompatible with sleeping with the enemy.

    You really aren’t bright enough to pick up on anything at all subtle, are you.

     
  17. Mr. Anon says:
    @chris
     

    It can be exactly like that – I got mine and y’all can go to hell – as I said. Anyway, how do you think slavery ended up being the south’s peculiar institution? It wasn’t poles or swedes who decided they’d have black slaves do their work for them.

    I’m not talking about the greatest crimes in history. I’m talking about structural problems in an anglo-saxon country that lie in the anglo-saxon character. Not everything is about whatever your bete noire happens to be.

     
  18. Anonym says:
    @KSA
     

    The problem with we Whites is that we’ve always been too nice to Jews. If we kick them out of our countries for the crimes they commit against us they scream persecution, then come back in and murder us. If we help them, they invent crimes we never committed against them (The Tsars and the “pogroms”) and murder us anyway.

    This seems a strategic error. But yes, look at WW2 and the lack of gratitude shown. The Great Seal of the USA has the bald eagle with arrows in one set of claws and the olive branch in the other. What would the equivalent concept be for elite Jewry (our host excepted)? I’m thinking a vulture, with arrows in both sets of claws. Maybe one set is marginally bigger. Or maybe arrows and a slaver’s noose. Or maybe a bag of shekels.

     
  19. Them Guys says:
    @Heros
     

    Another Grand Slam Homer by Heros.

     
  20. Kiza says:
    @annamaria
     

    Yes, your point supports Kratoklastes. It is the evolution which could have built in cooperation as the positive strategy into babies. But I must say that even in the video the experiment looks a little biased – when the facilitator offers puppets for selection to babies there is a slight emphasis and an increased proximity of the “right choice”. The study design has accounted for the color bias (the attractive bright orange color is the bad puppet), but not for the human factor. But it could also be the angle of viewing. I would love to believe in 80% baby goodness, but I remain sceptical.

     
  21. Zeidner says: • Website
    @ivan
     

    I often suspect that these blood libels are created by Jews in order to remove undesireable elements in the Jewish community. They may in fact commit these crimes.

    See my point above about why blaming jews makes no logical sense.

    I don’t really know much about Ron.

     
  22. Zeidner says: • Website
    @Anon
     

    Interesting.

    Seems were on the cusp of something breaking through. There is massive corruption right now. Its like a giant abscess threatening our life.

    • Replies: @annamaria
     
  23. Zeidner says: • Website
    @ploni almoni
     

    Why should anyone support israel?

    1. Because it’s jewish

    It was really anti jew when it began, and it collaborated with hitler. It is arguably jewish in principle. Is it a safety zone for jews or is it causing all the problems for jews? Anyone who lives there complains non stop about corruption.

    2. Its democratic

    Lol

    3. Its americas friend

    Seemingly the place is more about the interests of American billionaires than anything else. Its not a nice place for 95% of israelies.

     
  24. @Anon
     

    “Earlier you said that you are Shia on gulf conservative council or something similar. You have read the hadiths .”

    Yes, I am a Shia and I am from the GCC (Gulf Consultative Council) which consists of Six Countries. Do a google.

    You have quoted hadiths from Bukhari. Who is al-Bukhari? He is a man from Bukhara, who was blind and not an Arab. He lived 200+ years after the demise of the Prophet. After the demise of the Prophet, the Prophet’s hadiths were burned, it is in the Book of Bukhari. Then these hadiths were cooked and cooked and then recooked. If a Caliph or few rich Muslims were pedophiles themselves, then cook hadiths that the Prophet married a 6 years old child. Emulate the Prophet as he is a walking, talking Quran. Catch my drift.

    Now look at the narrator of the hadiths, and you will find it is the same 6 years old girl Aisha. She is singing her own songs. Now, look at the complete Chapter 66 of the Quran, which has 12 verses, which are all about Aisha and Hafsa, the two wives of the Prophet. It mentions in these verses, that these two are liars and destined for hell. Now, who do you want me to believe? Quran or Aisha with blind Bukhari?

    And, there is other evidence that when Prophet married her, she was 34 years old and divorcee.

    The Quran tells us that the Prophet was created a “mercy to mankind”. If a Caliph wanted to torture prisoners, then cook a hadith that the Prophet used to torture prisoners by putting hot irons in their eyes. Who should I believe? Quran or Bukhari?

    I hope you catch my drift.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
     
  25. SAM J etc.

    You guys are not “German-Americans”. You’re Anglo-Celtic hicks from the sticks. Say what you want about Jews but please don’t tell a German Yankee that Jews were pulling little girls off the streets in Weimar Germany and raping them in front of German men.

    I don’t know why you whites from the sticks purport to have insights to Jewish crimes when the only Jew in your Podunk city is the public defender or the dentist.

    None of you are Irish-Catholics or Italians from New York who live among Jews. Irish-Catholic women in NYC are not reporting being raped by Jews in their workplaces.

    And even if they were, you’d have no knowledge of it because you are either from the South or the interior of the US.

    Do white girls like Stormy Daniels get exploited by Jews in the porn industry or sex industry when they run away to LA or NYC.

    Sure. But the Jews are not kidnapping them and they are over 21.

    The reason so many white girls from the Flyover or the South get into porn is a) the lousy economies b) the shit wages of a truck stop waitress or retail salesgirl and c) the broken homes like that of Stormy Daniels where both parents were 21 when she was born and Dad took off.

    In that way-the broken home, the poor parents, the single mother-poor white hicks are like Negros.

    • Replies: @iffen
     
    @Them Guys
     
    @OilcanFloyd
     
    @Anon
     
  26. @Anon
     

    “What does this make Islam and Christianity? Founded out of a parody religion and recycling the same parody themes and the same parody characters and parody prophets from Judaism ?”

    As a Muslim, I used to take it as an insult, that the Prophet Mohammad copied the stories from the Bible and he got these stories all wrong. Now, I take it as a compliment, if you catch my drift.

    So yes, the stories are not the same!

    • Replies: @Anon
     
  27. Seraphim says:
    @Echoes of History
     

    “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”.

    The transcription of the Declaration is defective. The original, in handwriting, has ‘Natures’ God’, with the apostrophe correctly placed to indicate a genitive. It means grammatically, the God OF the Nature. All printed texts introduced the incorrect spelling (which was in the sloppy draft of Jefferson) ‘Nature’s’ God. The apostrophe between the word and s stands for ‘such and such IS whatever’. So in the semi-litterate peoples’ minds it became ‘God IS Nature’. The lecture becomes nonsensical: “The Laws of Nature and of God IS Nature”.
    The Founding Fathers were intent to speak about the ‘traditional’ God, well, the ‘God’ of the Jews, of Newton, of the Deists. Not the Christian one, here Matthew Stewart is right. America is NOT a Christian nation and that “freedom FROM religion (Christian) is precisely what America’s founders had in mind”. It explains why the Christmas tree has been practically banned and replaced with the Hanukkah Menorah.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
     
  28. @Jimi Shmendrix
     

    “Learned-sounding theory but that’s about it.”

    “More of that Islamic revisionist history.”

    One cannot deny the evolution of the languages, whether oral evolution of the languages, or written evolution of the language.

    Till today, the Modern Arabic is written without vowel, and so does it offshoot Hebrew. In Modern Arabic, there are just “nouns”. And, there are no such thing as “nouns, pronouns, and proper nouns”

    Here are two statements from New Testaments in Aramaic:

    “eli eli lama sabachthani”

    “eloi eloi lama sabachthani”

    Now show me the nouns, pronouns and proper nouns in the above two statements. Also, show me the vowels in the above two statements. BTW, the whole two sentences are written without “Capital Letters” as there are no capital letters in Semitic languages.

    • Replies: @Jimi Shmendrix
     
  29. Seraphim says:
    @Jared Eliot
     

    He married her when she was nine. But never say that M. was a pedophile if you value your head. It’s OK to say that the Catholic priests are.

     
  30. @Frankie P
     

    “Now God also wanted it like this, so in this sense, moral and human principles are consistent with the law of the heavens, because the Abrahamic religions didn’t come up with anything that contradicts the mind or contradicts the human instinct because the creator of the religion is the same as the creator of the humans, and the two things are totally consistent.”

    I don’t think that you will have many Sunnis who will agree to the above statement of Sayyed NasrAllah. It is the main theological different between Shia and Sunni (a offshoot of Judaism from hadiths).

    According to Shia it is our minds or more likely our instincts which guides us to “right and wrong”. Thus, you will find that most of the people and most of the atheists are good people doing right and shying away from evil.

    To Sunni like Judaism, it the Laws of God. God told us what is “right or wrong”. So, if tomorrow God or His Mullahs tell us that killing is permitted, then go ahead and kill people for 72 virgins. The theology of the “liver eaters” comes from this principle, if you catch my drift.

     
  31. @KSA
     

    Mozes, if he existed, is supposed to have been a priest at Heliopolis, the city built by a pharao who tried to introduce monotheism.
    Historians see monotheism as the effort by those in power te legitimise themselves through one god.
    If the theory is correct, then Mozes succeeded where the pharao failed
    Jobs and sacrifices are less with one god than by many

     
  32. Seraphim says:
    @Echoes of History
     

    An Echochamber of Jewish propaganda masquerading as anti-Jew.

    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @Echoes of History
     
  33. @Art
     

    GB had a jewish prime minister
    E. T. Raymond (Edward Raymond Thompson), ‘Disraeli: The Alien Patriot’, 1925, London

     
  34. @Jared Eliot
     

    Marriages like this also took place in Europe, maybe even a few hundred years ago.
    Diplomacy.
    No sex until the girl was at age, fifteen or so.

     
  35. KSA says:
    @Wally
     

    muh 6 million works because it’s so absurd. Nobody questions big lies, just as Hitler said.

     
  36. @Greasy William
     

    Goyim is a totally neutral term, it is not derogatory.

    I keep reading in HBD circles and elsewhere how awesomely superior the Jewish IQ is yet you blokes keep throwing up these easily refuted statements.

    Don’t you realise that if a simple google search can contradict something you’ve said in your argument then the rest automatically becomes suspect?

    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/goy

    goy
    NOUN
    derogatory, informal
    A Jewish name for a non-Jew.

    My bolding.

    Please do not now tell us the Oxford English dictionary is not definitive.

    • Replies: @Pat Hannagan
     
    @Anonymous
     
    @Greasy William
     
  37. Seraphim says:
    @Jared Eliot
     

    Jesus spoke in Greek too. Some Apostles had Greek names (Andrew, Philip). Jesus gave Simon a Greek name: Petros!

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
     
  38. @Pat Hannagan
     

    Just for good measure:

    http://www.dictionary.com/browse/goyim

    Usage note
    Use of this term usually implies a contempt for non-Jews as being different from or even inferior to Jews: Only a goy would use such faulty logic. goy is rarely used in a neutral, descriptive way as a synonym for gentile , though that is its meaning in Yiddish and Hebrew. In another usually disparaging usage, goy is applied to a Jew who is not observant.
    Dictionary.com Unabridged
    Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2018
    Examples from the Web for goyim
    Contemporary Examples
    His approval rating among Jews, steady in the low 60s, is about 15 percent higher than it is with the goyim.

    Obama’s Silent Jewish Majority
    Eric Alterman

    August 22, 2010

    Historical Examples
    “It would make us undistinguishable from the goyim,” answered Bensef.
    Rabbi and Priest
    Milton Goldsmith

    Besides, these Goyim were trying to undermine the True Religion.
    Comrade Yetta
    Albert Edwards

    The Goyim refuse us equal rights because they know we’re their superiors.
    Ghetto Tragedies
    Israel Zangwill

    etc etc

     
  39. Heros says:
    @renfro
     

    Because jews have been ritually torturing and murdering Christian children for centuries, lying about it, projecting their own crimes back on the Christians, then persecuting the Christians for daring to mention it.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
     
  40. Heros says:
    @AaronB
     

    Yet another jew psychopath bragging about his psychopathic jewish buddies. Why don’t you just go full jew and quote crowley:

    Jews like to think how civilized they are, but in reality all they have ever done is prey off of other races.

     
  41. @Jared Eliot
     

    Your incorrect assertion that Arabic somehow predates Hebrew is preposterous. Again, you “sound” as if you know what you’re talking about, but it’s just a big load of made-up nonsense. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Hebrew_writings

     
  42. Oh boy, if ever a thread on this site demanded tighter moderation standards, it was this one. Alas! Really dropped the ball, Ron.

    • Replies: @Pat Hannagan
     
  43. Anonymous[406] • Disclaimer says:

    Can someone explain here how Ron’s approach to understanding Judaism and the Jewish people could be considered commonsensical, practical or methodological? He read a highly obscure book full of conspiracy theories by Israel Shahak and then “paid a considerable sum to a young graduate student I knew, tasking him to verify the claims in Shahak’s books.”

    Let’s say you were Chinese and wanted to learn from scratch about American history and culture. You find an obscure 100 page book on the subject — which you know has an ax to grind and is way outside the mainstream — and then ask a third party to look up its footnotes for you. This obscure work and the third party’s review of it then become the basis for how you decide to orient your entire assessment of American history and culture.

    It is hard to think of how Ron could have been more unempirical in his approach to understanding a history, religion, people and way of life. Here is what he could have done:

    1) Read books written by and for Jews about Judaism, which are acknowledged to be mainstream works within a major Jewish religious stream, e.g. Orthodox, Conservative, etc. (i.e. books with which they identify and are thus representative).
    2) Speak directly with a sample of rabbis and/or practicing Jews.
    3) Spend time with Orthodox Jews and/or observe how they live (i.e. Jews who self-identify with mainstream Orthodoxy and not with some small, rare or marginal sect).
    4) Speak with academic scholars of Jewish history, religion and culture of a wide variety of viewpoints in the field.
    5) Speak with highly self-critical intellectual Jews (e.g. Noam Chomsky, Michael Chabon), who certainly do not hesitate to pursue the negative, if they can find (or imagine) it.

    If the above resources do not corroborate the conspiracy theories contained in Shahak’s writings, in what sense can the claims in his book be considered to be representative of the mainstream (i.e. the majority) or reliable in any way on the subject at hand?

    (Ron – Do you feel confident that you took a wise approach to forming your views and feelings on Jews and Judaism, based on which you would then devote such a considerable amount of your time and mental energy?)

    One of many bizarre claims attributed by Ron to Shahak is that Jews pray to Satan. (Has even the majority of avowed Jew haters made such a claim about Jews?!) To investigate this absolutely ridiculous claim, Ron could have simply purchased a Jewish prayer book (or an array of them, if he wanted to be very thorough), of which there are many with English translations.

    Ron – You owe it to yourself and to your own happiness to take a much more commonsense oriented, open minded and practical approach to educating yourself on this topic. (For example, you could read “Understanding Judaism: The Basics of Deed and Creed” by Benjamin Blech.)

    Wishing you a broader perspective, and the edification that comes from seeing the beauty and ennobling sides of humanity, including the Jewish people, their values and their culture.

    • Replies: @UncommonGround
     
  44. j2 says:
    @ivan
     

    The prohibition is not circumvented by any hand-waving. It stays. Read the Hagganah ritual from Ariel Toaff and see that in the rite of 10 curses (the curses of Moses, which are reflected also in the European partially Jewish grimoires 6th and 7th books of Moses, calling frogs and so on) dried blood was added to wine of the head of the household, who poured some wine to the ground for each curse, just to follow this rule: the blood is to be poured to the ground.

    But there is another rune for the high priest. Read the Epistle of Barnabas. This Barnabas (whoever he was, was a Jewish Christian and knew the temple practices apparently better than most. He tells that in the redemption day, Jom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, the priests ate in the holiest of holy flesh that was not washed, therefore it had some blood. Why is this? Because this rite is for redemption of the sins and redemption is in blood. There is a difference it the deed is done by the high priest or by somebody else.

    Notice the two goats of the Day of Atonement and their connection to Jesus. Jesus of Nazareth and Jesus Barnabas were judged. One was tortured and killed, the other one was driven away. The Epistle of Barnabas tells a very interesting version: One of them returned and the people said, is this not the one we already crucified, as so alike were the two.

    The original ritual of redemption in the Second temple Judaism did include eating blood, it was necessary for redemption and not in contradiction with the rule of not eating blood. The other rule applied to all other cases of eating blood. Remember also Jesus in the Gospel of Thomas tells a story where a man carries a sheep and asks what he is going to do with the sheep. The disciples answer, he will eat it, to which Jesus answers, the man is not going to eat the sheep, he kills it and eats the corpse, but what do you do if you eat alive. That is, blood is alive. Jesus asks them to eat alive to get life, since by eating dead they get death.

    This was about redemption, but there is also the magic usage. The magic usage is to repeat the curses of Moses and before the new Exodus these curses are cast. Thus, it is necessary to do the black magic in this case and it requires a sacrifice to God. Again this is sacred usage of blood and it does not conflict with the prohibition to drink blood. Thus Idra Zuta is not in contradiction with Torah, how could it possibly be? Are you seriously claiming that the holiest book of Zohar is in contradiction with the true interpretation of Torah just because you think you read the prohibition in Torah like you read it. Obviously, you read it incorrectly. Idra Zuta does tell to drink bl0od.

    The kings of Edom must be destroyed before Tikkun. The spells must be cast and this requires a sacrifice since otherwise the wrath of God is directed also to the Jews. This is why in the Exodus, doorways were painted with blood and why Jesus was the Passover lamb. This is not a different usage of blood. It is fundamentally the same. There is a usage of blood and eating blood in Second temple Judaism, which continued in Kabbalism. It was suppressed in normal Judaism and most Jews do not know it, but it was and is there.

    • Replies: @utu
     
    @ivan
     
    @Zumbuddi
     
  45. @Seraphim
     

    You must be reading your Nietzsche like a good boy! Great job, Seraphim!

    The Jew Testament is just what you say, anti-White Jewish propaganda.

    And with the Jewish infighting on display, it can, as you say, masquerade as anti-Jew in places, which suckers Whites into taking sides in a Jewish imbroglio.

    It’s great that you understand a White man not abasing himself by taking sides in a Jewish quarrel among Jewish Rabbis.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
     
    @Anon
     
  46. @Heros
     

    The evidence for this is competely lacking, in my opinion.

    • Replies: @Heros
     
  47. Seraphim says:
    @Jared Eliot
     

    You are drifting too much. Sura 66 doesn’t say anything about the age of Aisha, actually it doesn’t mention her name at all. And why don’t you show us the ‘other evidence’ that Aisha was 34 years old?

     
  48. @Seraphim
     

    The Jewess Barbara Lerner Spectre took the Greek name Barbara (βάρβαρος) and even speaks good English! She must truly love us!

    Hmm, I looked up “gullible goy” in the dictionary, and Seraphim’s picture illustrated it. What’s that pointy hat on his head, and why is he sitting with his nose in the corner?

     
  49. utu says:
    @j2
     

    Interesting.

     
  50. @Seraphim
     

    Seraphim, like the little Jewish angel you are, you’re making a mountain out of a molehill. Matthew Stewart well covers the origins of the DoI term “Nature’s God” in his text. In short, it stems from Spinoza, with likely influence by John Locke. Both Jefferson and Locke had Spinoza’s collected works in their libraries.

    • “Deus, sive Natura” (God, or Nature) -Spinoza
    • “Nature’s God” -Declaration of Independence

    Another source who says the same thing about the source of “Nature’s God” as in Stewart’s text:

    I know it’s fun for you to go Full Spergmeister about punctuation and cast aspersions about everybody else being “semi-litterate” (LOL!), but this time you really made a fool of yourself.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
     
  51. iffen says:
    @Greasy William
     

    anybody who says otherwise is in “moon landing was faked” territory.

    We traversed that territory many months (moons) ago.

     
  52. @ploni almoni
     

    What a bizarre non-sequitur.

     
  53. Struck me as a brilliantly simple expression of intellectual honesty about all the things he’s read.

    I wanted to ask Ron something about what he mentioned about non-religious Jews.

    A lot of WNs I admire often, in my opinion, conflate genetics with environmental factors.

    For instance: without the Talmud driving into this inbred group how much better, superior and worthy their type is your typical ashkenazi would slip into the general population of Whites.

    Ron opened this subject up in one of the paragraphs above which I can’t find now.

    Ashkenazi is a racial definition not a worldview.

     
  54. iffen says:
    @Jeff Stryker
     

    In that way-the broken home, the poor parents, the single mother-poor white hicks are like Negros.

    This may be true, but we still have our white privilege and that is priceless.

     
  55. Giuseppe says:

    Ron Unz has peeled back the wallpaper yet again. This is worse than Mossad involvement in the JFK assassination. The possibility that the blood libel could be true changes what I ever thought I knew about reality.

    • Replies: @Anon
     
    @ChuckOrloski
     
  56. Why do you demand Unz owe you an answer as to why he isn’t as demented about your religion as you are?

    Probably greater than 80% of jews wish they weren’t associated with the rest of the inbred psychopathic rabbis.

    He stated he wasn’t brought up in your demented religion.

    Btw, matriarchal lineage is a talmud thing. Torah takes its lineage patriarchally.

     
  57. utu says:
    @j2
     

    This is important. Renders the argument based on the prohibition of blood consumption in Judaism moot.

    • Replies: @j2
     
  58. iffen says:
    @Kratoklastes
     

    – the key thing is that high-IQ people tend to reject nationalist/trialist drivel

    They are also smart enough to choose survival over the guillotine, but, alas.

     
  59. Them Guys says:
    @Jeff Stryker
     

    Says unz’s foremost expert who left usa 20-25 years ago. Yet he still has better inside inner American issues info or knowledge of day to day events within America, and this is the reason all you others here need to listen to him on these issues.

    Or….His almost every reply in some form or other is always a defense of all issues jewish.

Komentari na prvi clanak! - #720 - #780....

 

 

  1. • Replies: @utu
     
    @Jeff Stryker
     
  2. This post is epic:

    Highly distinctive cultural patterns and social attitudes can easily seep into a considerably wider population, especially one that remains ignorant of the origin of those sentiments, a condition enhancing their unrecognized influence. A religion based upon the principal of “Love Thy Neighbor” may or may not be workable in practice, but a religion based upon “Hate Thy Neighbor” may be expected to have long-term cultural ripple effects that extend far beyond the direct community of the deeply pious. If nearly all Jews for a thousand or two thousand years were taught to feel a seething hatred toward all non-Jews and also developed an enormous infrastructure of cultural dishonesty to mask that attitude, it is difficult to believe that such an unfortunate history has had absolutely no consequences for our present-day world, or that of the relatively recent past.

    • Agree: utu
    • Replies: @Echoes of History
     
  3. @silviosilver
     

    Why does it require moderation?

     
  4. Anonymous[159] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pat Hannagan
     

    Transparent, bold-faced lying is something that Jews do all the time.

    The mechanism behind it is quite simple. You get a 90 IQ Jew – who’s, like, totally 20 IQ points smarter than the dumb goyim – trying to trick the un-chosen and the un-washed. So we end up with a lie that can only pass mustard in a 70 IQ crowd.

    Stupidity and confidence (or mediocrity and pride) really mix badly.

    • Replies: @Joe862
     
  5. Heros says:
    @jilles dykstra
     

    Ron Unz in this very Pravda article has come out fudging by saying that there is a “strong likelyhood” that it happened. There are dozens of sainted martyred boys who were tortured and murdered by jews and rabbis, and the jews confessed and were convicted in court.

    We know that jews will never accept a court decision that they didn’t write, or a historical document that they didn’t forge, but then again, satans spawn have made lying to goyim their most redeeming feature for centuries.

    Obviously, jews will never accept their Christian kindercaust, just like they will never accept their own lies about 6m. This is why any self respecting Christian will have nothing to do with this swine of a race.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
     
  6. Raul Hilberg, who has spent 36 years studying the Holocaust and the subsequent Nuremberg trials of war criminals, testified earlier for the Crown that five million Jews were killed during the war.

    Zundel, 46, a West German citizen living in Toronto, is charged with two counts of publishing statements that are known to be false and likely to cause injury or mischief to the public interest of maintaining social and religious tolerance.

    Two of his publications–one called Did Six Million Really Die?–postulate that the Holocaust was a hoax to vilify Germans and exact compensation payments from them.

    “Can you give me one scientific report that shows the existence of gas chambers anywhere in Nazi-occupied territory?” defence counsel Doug Christie asked Hilberg in a day-long rapid fire of cross-examination.

    “I am at a loss,” Hilberg replied.

    “You are (at a loss) because you can’t,” Christie said.

    The witness countered that there are aerial photographs of concentration camps, examples of ruined or reconstructed gas chambers, German industrial documents describing the lethal nature of various gases and filters for gas masks were found at the camps.

    Hilberg agreed with Christie there are no autopsy reports indicating even a single person died from exposure to poisonous gas in chambers.

    http://fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/controversies/liars/Hilberg3.html

    http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf

    • Replies: @Wally
     
  7. Ron, I salute your testament:

    Obviously the Talmud is hardly regular reading among ordinary Jews these days, and I would suspect that except for the strongly Orthodox and perhaps most rabbis, barely a sliver are aware of its highly controversial teachings. But it is important to keep in mind that until just a few generations ago, almost all European Jews were deeply Orthodox, and even today I would guess that the overwhelming majority of Jewish adults had Orthodox grand-parents. Highly distinctive cultural patterns and social attitudes can easily seep into a considerably wider population, especially one that remains ignorant of the origin of those sentiments, a condition enhancing their unrecognized influence.

    This post is most underrated most taking at surface some base fag objection to base fag religion.

    • Replies: @Anonymous445
     
  8. utu says:
    @Them Guys
     

    Jeff Stryker is a troll. Has similar anti white sentiments as another troll Thomm who most likely is Indian. Both of theme are playing divide and rule tactics. Jeff Stryker and and Thomm both rant against the “white trash” though Jeff Stryker tries too split it along Protestant/Catholic line. They might be coming from the same troll factory or even be one person.

    • Agree: Them Guys
    • Disagree: iffen
    • Replies: @attilathehen
     
    @Anon
     
    @Jeff Stryker
     
  9. If nearly all Jews for a thousand or two thousand years were taught to feel a seething hatred toward all non-Jews and also developed an enormous infrastructure of cultural dishonesty to mask that attitude, it is difficult to believe that such an unfortunate history has had absolutely no consequences for our present-day world, or that of the relatively recent past.

    • Agree: renfro
  10. @Jeff Stryker
     

    I’m not exactly sure who you are mentioning, but there is a significant German component to the South, though it was long ago assimilated. Some of the earliest settlers of Georgia were Salzburgers, and North Carolina and Virginia had Moravians, Swiss dissenters and others. I don’t know as much about South Carolina, but I assume the same is true there. By the time that the interior of the South was settled, the Germans were assimilated, as were the English, Scots, Scots-Irish, French Huguenots and others. All of this happened before there was a city called Chicago.

    Jews have been in the South since colonial times. Charleston and Savannah have some of the oldest synagogues in the nation. We have experienced Jews. They were involved in the slave trade and owned plantations, unlike most whites. (Jews even owned slaves at a higher percentage than whites.) Many carpetbaggers were also Jews. If you are interested go look up Sherman’s General order 11 concerning Jews entering the South as profiteers during the Civil War. And who do you think owned all of those department stores/lunch counters that refused to sell to blacks? It wasn’t the podunks. The South has had plenty of experience with Jews, just not the SJW Ashkenazi types that came in the late 19th and early 20th century to the North.

    Look a bit deeper into the Leo Frank case. IF Frank were framed, and that is highly unlikely, it is because whites of that era were familiar enough with Jewish saloon and brothel owners to have the stereotype of the defiling Jew taking advantage of young women in the cities. With Frank the issue was using low-wage child labor and frequenting prostitutes himself, as well as the likely murder and rape of a child.

    Do you know for sure that the bulk of porn actresses are from flyover country or the South? I tend to doubt that. I’m also not sure that there is a higher rate of divorce/broken homes among whites in the South. As for the economy, half of rust belt and the outlying areas of every major city of the North has come South. I’d gladly send them home, but they refuse to leave.

     
  11. @Heros
     

    If, as you say, “any self respecting Christian will have nothing to do with this swine of a race,” then why worship them?

    You have a contradiction to resolve.

     
  12. Seraphim says:
    @Echoes of History
     

    The idiotical admiration of your White would be Übermensch for Nietzsche is beyond comprehension. Nietzsche was one of the most pro-Jewish German writers of his time for whom the Jews were“the strongest, toughest, and purest race now living in Europe,” and that Jews’ wish “to be absorbed and assimilated by Europe … should be noted well and accommodated”, but was never “tempted to participate in the mendacious racial self-admiration (of the Germans) and racial indecency that parades in Germany today”, a notorious ‘anti-antisemite’ (he wanted to kill all the anti-semites!), a real echo chamber of Talmudic lore about Christ. They never read what Nietzsche really wrote. Neither did you, of course although you make yourself his echochamber. Pathetic.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
     
  13. I strongly suspect that some of the most common traditional economic niches of European Jews, such as tax-farming and the arrenda estate-management system of Eastern Europe, should be best understood in a similar light, with Jews being more likely to extract every last penny of value from the peasants they controlled for the benefit of their local king or lords, and their notorious antipathy for all non-Jews ensuring that such behavior was minimally tempered by any human sympathy. Thus, we should not be surprised that Jews first entered England in the train of William the Conqueror, in order to help him and his victorious Norman lords effectively exploit the subjugated Anglo-Saxon population they now ruled.

    Waiting for Steve Sailer or Derbyshire to interject…

     
  14. @Pat Hannagan
     

    Your observation of a seething hatred toward all non-Jews must include Rabbi Jesus, who ranted against Gentile White Patriarchal society, specifically European fascist Romans.

    Perhaps his anti-authoritarian ANTIFA rants against White Patriarchal society is what made Rabbi Jesus so very popular with the Synagogue of Satan.

    Jews gonna Jew.

     
  15. One for all fans of Big Jew:

     
  16. Anonymous[953] • Disclaimer says:

    I don’t know about the ritual deaths in the Middle Ages, as the details are sketchy, but regarding the death of Father Tommaso in Syria (Damascus affair), I’ve read the process with the confessions of the prisoners (I think it’s available online somewhere), and it is seems mostly true. Yes, maybe “the confessions were obtained under torture”, still, there is no way that someone could invent all the details, nor the references to Jewish religion and rituals. Still, it is not indicative of a general practice, and not 100% evidence. Ariel Toaff’s Pasque di Sangue is also available online in Italian. Or used to be.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
     
  17. Yep, it’s true.

    One thing that unites all Churchillian promoters is how much they are prepared to sell out their kin and close family:

    Never doubt their lies.

     
  18. Anon[202] • Disclaimer says:
    @Giuseppe
     

    Why? We know, for instance, that there were sometimes Black Masses among Catholics, and that in at least one occasion these were mixed up in a poisoning plot. The only real difference is that Jews or at least their public mouthpieces say “Nope, never happened. What, you think there might have been an instance of ritual murder by Jews 600 years ago? You filthy hater! Recant, I demand of you!”

     
  19. Joe862 says:
    @Anonymous
     

    This is what I’ve found. While they may be a bit smarter on average it’s not some huge gap and there are plenty of dumb jews out there. As far as I can tell they essentially just don’t have a working class. If you went to college and work someplace where most people went to college there’s no reason to think the jews you interact with are any smarter than anyone else. If you’re a bit smarter than the average college grad you’re probably also a bit smarter than most of the jews you come in contact with. Almost all of them will assume they’re smarter than you, though.

    In general I’ve found that you learn the most about a group from their least sophisticated members and jews are no exception. There’s another forum I hang around on sometimes and an old jewish guy is getting really senile and his true feelings are coming out more and more. He’s drowning in hatred of white guys. It’s pretty funny.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
     
  20. annamaria says:
    @Zeidner
     

    There is indeed a life-threatening abscess and it is becoming only worse every day. One of the causes of the abscess is the presstituting media that has been in the WMD-mode for almost two decades. The MSM is tightly controlled by Israel-firsters who cannot help themselves but bring the country to a catastrophe. https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/07/18/crazed-us-presstitutes-drive-the-world-to-nuclear-war/

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
     
  21. Seraphim says:
    @Echoes of History
     

    Well, that only demonstrates the Jewish influence upon the Founding Fathers. Spinoza was not a ‘White Aryan’. His philosophy was ‘meant to preclude any anthropomorphizing of the divine being’ which was what Jews reproached to Christianity. His philosophy was in fact an attack on Christianity.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
     
  22. Seraphim says:
    @Anonymous
     

    It is available in English @https://archive.org/details/BloodPassoverTheJewsOfEuropeAndRitualMurderByArielToaff

     
  23. @Giuseppe
     

    Giuseppe wisely wrote:
    “Ron Unz has peeled back the wallpaper yet again. This is worse than Mossad involvement in the JFK assassination. The possibility that the blood libel could be true changes what I ever thought I knew about reality.”

    Hi Giuseppe,

    I admire how you (uniquely) paid homage to Mr. Unz’s frequent forensic acts of “peeling back the wallpaper.”

    Like you, regarding this article, the content of Ron’s having established the “blood libel” as possibly TRUE startled me beyond measure. And he has educated background-authority for what he wrote.

    Exposure of a satanic blood libel “oddity” of the Jewish religion indeed surpasses that of the “JFK assassination & Mossad’s involvement.”

    Naturally, I fear for Ron’s well being (safety-security) because I don’t believe Jews who have knowledge & culpability for “blood libel” actions will make an allowance for what a secular Jew, Ron Unz, has exposed here.

    Thanks so much, Giuseppe!

    Selah, we have met Giuseppe’s Pinocchio and he is nearby the wall-papered altar, inside the confession booth.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
     
  24. @annamaria
     

    Revisionism is Inevitable, Says Jabotinsky, Here for Wide Tour

    Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA)
    January 27, 1935 [upon arrival at port in New York City]

    http://www.jta.org/1935/01/27/archive/revisionism-is-inevitable-says-jabotinsky-here-for-wide-tour

    Jabotinsky was leader of “Revisionist” Zionism, which endorsed militarism and the use of violence to achieve the zionist vision — the complete takeover of Palestine and an “iron wall” doctrine toward the indigenous Palestinians. Benzion Netanyahu, Bibi’s father, was Jabotinsky’s aide in USA until Jabotinsky died in 1940. At that point, Benzion’s status in the American zionism increased.

    Benjamin Netanyahu and Likud in Israel hew closely to Revisionist zionist ideology.


    PLEASE note that Nazzees did not start pitch-forking Joos into ovens, or was it gas-fueled barbecue grills, until more than five years after Jabotinsky’s tours of USA and declaration of the militant ideology of Jewish occupiers of Palestine.

    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
     
  25. OIL

    So what is the reason for the fixation with Jews in the South, where there are few, while non-Jews in the Northeast (The Irish-Catholics, Italians etc) don’t seem to be affected by them? You’d think that Irish-Catholics, who’ve always lived neck-in-neck with Jews in NYC or Boston or Chicago, would be the ones with the grievance.

    But no, it is people in the South far from the Beltway or NYC.

    “Germans in the South”

    Yes and many in Texas but please don’t tell me that Jews were pulling German kids and women off the street in Germany and raping them with German men doing nothing about it. Jewish economic and cultural influences in Europe were always despised, but they did not commit rape in front German men.

    “Brothels and saloon keepers”

    The girls that worked there would (And did) have peddled ass for whoever owned the establishment. Italians, Irish, blacks, Cajuns, whoever.

    “Leo”

    It is far more common for a black to rape a white woman or female child than a Jew, statistically. I don’t deny that Leo may have been guilty (He probably was and was probably goaded by his black janitor accomplice) but this is a rare case.

    “Jews owned slaves at a higher percentage”

    Jews were always merchants, the English planters needed the vast labor. How many slaves would a Jewish money-lender or horse trader really need?

    As for Rust Belt migrants to the South, this must have been after my time. When I was a lad in Detroit it was the Southerner migrating North. I cannot conceive of what Rust Belt people would do in the South, besides Miami.

    • Replies: @Anon
     
    @Anon
     
    @Anon
     
    @OilcanFloyd
     
  26. Wally says:
    @kingedward1wasright1290
     

    And Hilberg is their best shot. LOL

    Hilberg’s claimed aerial photos of impossible ‘gas chambers’ debunked here:

    VIDEO classic: Auschwitz Aerial photos, tampered with to fit the fake story / by John Ball

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11669

    The Giant with Feet of Clay, Raul Hilberg and His Standard Work on the ‘Holocaust’

    https://codoh.com/library/document/1180/?lang=en

    Raul Hilberg Now Explains that the Genocide of the Jews Was Carried Out by Telepathy
    By Robert Faurisson

    https://codoh.com/library/document/2443/?lang=en

    Her Majesty the Queen – versus – Ernst Zündel, Transcript of the First Zündel Trial, 1985

    https://codoh.com/library/document/3355/?lang=en

    http://www.codoh.com

     
  27. Anon[360] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jared Eliot
     

    Takes a heavy amount of larping and self delusion to say that The Old Testament is false but somehow got all the prophets and angels names totally correct , and somehow the koran is real when mohamad recycles the exact same prophets and angels using the exact same names as are used in the old testament.

     
  28. @Seraphim
     

    You only demonstrate your ignorance of history. The Jews tried to kill him.

    Keep digging your hole deeper, Jewangel.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
     
  29. @ChuckOrloski
     

    Agree that Unz’s courage in many areas including this extraordinary essay and catalog of ‘forbidden knowledge’ about Jewry is praiseworthy.

    But in my opinion, the discussion of blood libel is the least compelling and least useful toward resolving the very real problem of a particular subset of all Jews exercising domination over US — and, indeed, global culture, communications, finance, education and international relations.

    Must admit, tho, that I did not read very carefully the section about blood libel. In my view, it’s inflammatory and provocative, but not that useful in assessing patterns of Jewish predatory and dominance behavior.

    Stefan Molyneux posted a (too) lengthy analysis on Why People Hate Trump

    The system of in-group out-group interactions that Molyneux describes applies to Jews in spades

    (although in earlier talks, Molyneux maintains doggedly that “Jews are super-smart”. Shahak’s writing tackles that proposition and offers an enticing path for further study: How did Jews go from being a large, systemically under-educated and compliant group firmly under the life-and-death constraints of a small group of total-control leaders, a characterization that Nordau’s Degenerationsupports, to a small but restive — even revolutionary– group with “high IQ,” the “human material” that eugenicist Arthur Ruppin fashioned into the “new Jew” ?

    What happened to all the dumb, degenerate Jews that Shahak and Nordau and Jabotinsky himself, observed with disgust and dismay?

    Note to Wally: Next time you hear of a project to unearth Jewish corpses, suggest the dig start at the foot of Mt. Sinai.)

    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
     
  30. @Seraphim
     

    Ah, the Jewangel says admiring Whites is idiotic. You give away your anti-White agenda so early! And you might want to correct your misrepresentation of Nietzsche as a promoter of the Talmud by either reading him yourself or perusing this “The Rise and Fall of Nietzschean Anti-Semitism” assets.press.princeton.edu/chapters/s10635.pdf

    But you’re still worshiping Jews, aren’t you? “We worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.” (John 4:22)

    Must be your life verse. No wonder you’ve taken a Jewish angel name שְׂרָפִים (serafim.)

    And what does seraph mean? That you’re a flamer? Why would you want to be that?

    • Replies: @Seraphim
     
  31. @Pat Hannagan
     

    Goyim literally translates as “nations”. It isn’t derogatory.

    “Goy” can be, and often is, used pejoratively, but the term isn’t inherently pejorative. It’s like how you can call somebody a Jew and it can be either a pejorative or a neutral descriptor, depending on the tone and context.

    • Replies: @KSA
     
    @Echoes of History
     
  32. Veritatis says:
    @Olorin
     

    Bravo! Let’s not forget the prayer. You know I’m sure Augustine’s quote about history being the development of two types of love.

     
  33. j2 says:
    @utu
     

    More about the oddities in this particular religion.

    Blood would not be consumed in magical usage of blood. It would be far too dangerous, as the soul was believed to be in blood and the punishment of eating blood was death. I try to explain the concept of eating blood in Second temple Judaism.
    A good starting point is the saying of Jesus in logion 7 in the Gospel of Thomas. ‘Jesus said, “Blessed is the lion that the human being will devour so that the lion becomes human. And cursed is the human being that the lion devours; and the lion will become human.’
    There are many strange misunderstandings of these words: Gnostics thought that the lion means something evil, while Didymos the Blind thought that eating means accepting somebody’s teaching and that the ending should be that the human will become lion, but it is not so. The logion is meant just as it is above in the context of 1st century Judaism.
    The most logical explanation for this logion is that it talks about eating blood. Corpses can be eaten and they are destroyed when eaten, but blood is alive and has the soul. Thus, by eating blood you take the soul in the blood to your soul. If a lion devours a human, the lion gets the soul of the human, and according to Jesus this is bad: the human is cursed. While if a human devours a lion, the human stays as a human. Why so? It is because lion means here a human, not the animal. The lion is the king of Israel, the Messiah, a human with a pure soul. If a human eats blood containing the pure soul, he will become a human with a pure soul. The source of the pure soul, the lion, is blessed. While if the lion, the Messiah, eats blood that contains a human, impure, soul, he will become human with an impure soul. The source of the blood is cursed, as he destroyed the pure soul, not because he would be cursed by getting to the body of the Messiah.
    The message of this logion is that only blood with a pure soul can be eaten. Redemption is in blood, but only in the blood of the Messiah.
    Let us return to the cakes of Sefer HaRazim, the blood there must be from a cub of a lion. Jews of the 3rd century were not known to be hunting lions. This blood is not from a real lion: again the lion means the Messiah. The cub of a lion is a disciple of the Messiah, but it is very risky to drink blood from a disciple. He most probably does not have a pure soul. For magic such blood can be used, it may still work if the soul was pure, but drinking it is at a too great risk. It is better to break the cakes for predicting the future.
    Whoever ate blood had to die, but if he ate the pure soul, he would live as he ate life. He would be resurrected. Christians solved this problem by drinking blood in a symbolic way as wine, while high priests in the Day of Atonment took made two very dangerous things: they pronounced the forbidden name and ate drops of blood for redemption of the people’s sins. Jesus of course made miracles with God’s power and had to use the forbidden name.
    Each Kabbalistic Ba’al Shem could have been the promised Messiah (they had a secret society called Nistarim), and therefore there is the command for the whole companion to drink blood, but the Rabbi who so recommends was raised to the Heaven, had died as the punishment is death. This is in Idra Zuta, which is not in Zohar proper but in the extended Zohar. I would imagine that the whole companion drank blood, died and were raised to Heaven. There is also the Kabbalistic Tipheret rite, which may be related. It seems to have had a ritual murder as the main component, but the information is meager.
    For those of us, like me, who like their beef steaks bloody, this Jewish concept of blood may be somewhat strange. It is a very complicated issue, but it is something like this. For students of the true meaning of the words of Jesus this issue is important. I strongly suspect that what Jesus meant was not how it is now understood in Christianity. Just read the ending of the book of Zechariah, which has in the Deutero-Zechariah so many places reminding of Jesus and the ending is just the same Jewish supremacy idea.

     
  34. Crimson2 says:
    @annamaria
     

    Go back to sewing Klan robes or making flavorless mush for your trailer park brood.

    • Replies: @bjondo
     
    @annamaria
     
  35. @SolontoCroesus
     

    SolontoCroesus helpfully informed commenters, & conveyed: “Revisionism is Inevitable, Says Jabotinsky, Here for Wide Tour.”

    Hi S2C,

    Fyi, after Putin came to power in Boris Yeltsin’s Russia, ravaged by Jewish oligarch greed, anti-Western sentiment grew and the Russian Orthodox Church began to regain political & spiritual influence.

    Attention began to focus upon the ritualistic true story of the Romanov family’s barbaric execution…, including that of course ZUS’s usual tear-drop prompt, children.

    The Putin government, unreliant upon compromised “international scientist” mass murder theory-findings,” became open to information about Vladimir Lenin’s henchmen — including surplus of Jews –who demanded the heads of the Romanovs be returned to Moscow as a “diabolical Hebraic-Bolshevik tribute.”

    Knowledgeable of your near saintly-predilection for logic and objectivity, S2C, I post an article (below) about the Romanov serial murders that is from the benign & rather informative “Town and Country Magazine.”

    https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a8072/russian-tsar-execution/

    Thank you very much!

    Selah, Jabotinsky, & despite opposite-pole attraction, truth prevails, and “Revisionism is Inevitable.”

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
     
  36. Crimson2 says:
    @Wally
     

    White nationalists are idiots. We tried it your way and it sucked. Time to move on.

    • Replies: @Rich
     
  37. Anonymous[159] • Disclaimer says:
    @Joe862
     

    They’re actually less smart than white gentiles. Even the “official” average IQ nuber in Israel is only 95.

    The much-propagandised 110 IQ number was fabricated:

    - By the Jews over a long period of time (almost a century).
    - Only in the US (as their hold on the country increased).
    - Only for a Jewish sub-tribe (Ashkenazi).

    You decide if the Western MSM, Banking, Foreign Policy and Hollywood are in the hands of the bright bulbs.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
     
  38. @Pat Hannagan
     

    I would disagree that the Talmud “is hardly regular reading among Jews these days”.

    In fact, it seems to be quite popular:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-24367959

     
  39. KSA says:
    @Greasy William
     

    Can I call you an untermensch? It’s only really negative if you see it like that.

     
  40. @Greasy William
     

    Just like “Kike” is the Yiddish word for circle. Very etymology. Much neutral.

     
  41. @annamaria
     

    Thank you.

    The music is extraordinary; my form of worship.

     
  42. Scott Locklin says: • Website
    @Ron Unz
     

    Funny, I thought of this looney bird when you used the phrase. There was some other lunatic I encountered like this some years earlier; ran a Holocaust Museum, and accused me of antisemitism for posting a Laibach video on my own personal FB feed. That’s kind of like being accused of antisemitism for posting a … Star Trek video or something equally irrelevant. I don’t think I had ever had an antisemitic thought before encountering this person.

     
  43. @ChuckOrloski
     

    Thank you ChuckOrloski.

    Years ago I read Robert K Massie’s Nicholas and Alexandra, in part because my Father was a blood donor for a boy in the neighborhood who had hemophilia, like young Alexei. As Massie told the story, Rasputin gained such influence over the Czarina, and thereby the Czar, because he could sooth Alexei and comfort Alexandra. So I guess my Dad was involved in childhood blood rituals.

    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
     
  44. @SolontoCroesus
     

    With practical reason, S2C wrote: “But in my opinion, the discussion of blood libel is the least compelling and least useful toward resolving the very real problem of a particular subset of all Jews exercising domination over US — ”

    Hi S2C,

    Above, I am absolutely incapable of working out (recommending) a solution for Jewish “exercise of power over US.”

    Nonetheless, I am certain you’re aware of the proliferating rate of missing children in ZUS. Some of course are runaways and a percentage are possibly abducted / enlisted (?) into profitable pedophile internet-film organizations.

    Fyi, months ago here at U.R., the Saker complained about the incarceration of individual ZUS pedophiles and contradictory refusal to shut down “kiddie porn” web sites, as was the hated (often deservedly) Daily Stormer.

    At any rate, upon entry into the West Scranton Post Office and elsewhere, I cringe when seeing a missing children poster. I cringe while recalling the heinous murder of Leo and Lucia Krimm.

    Below is a web site which perhaps expands awareness on the matter of GLOBAL missing children. The statistical validity is uncertain to me, but nonetheless troubling.

    http://globalmissingkids.org/awareness/missing-children-statistics/

    Thanks, S2C!

    • Replies: @Anon
     
  45. Art says:
    @RobinG
     

    The only thing, Art, there are plenty of non-Jew war profiteers joining in the Trump-bashing. The Deep State has no religion but power and profit.

    Hi RobinG,

    Trump has done the unpardonable – he has attacked the US Security Apparatus.

    Clearly the Deep State Security Apparatus (Republican, Democrat, CIA, FBI, DOJ, DOD, et all) are incensed and invigorated. They and the media smell blood.

    I think the Democrats are going to do something, like shut the government down in hopes of effecting the Nov election. They are going to make the case to put the government on hold till the election.

    Even with all he has done for them – the Jews are going to do Trump in. (I don’t think he gets it.)

    (Netanyahu can play kissy face with Putin – but no American.)

    Think Peace — Art

     
  46. Definer says:

    The article raises important themes but will be undoubtedly found anti-Semitic, if not outright racist.

    Citations from Talmud and other primary sources would help. There is no question that Judaism as an old religion carries within it lots of traces of polytheism, and the mystical versions of it, per Kabbalah, indeed refer to both male and female deities, or rather male and female incarnations of the same God. Praying to Satan is a more controversial claim that must be substantiated with sources. However, in any monotheistic religion a person that addresses a higher being with a prayer full of hatred and evil wishes toward another human being is at risk of de-facto redirecting his request to a supreme being quite opposite from the one benevolent God. The dilemma is only partially addressed by a division of all humanity into the “true,” “faithful” or “chosen” part of this God’s favorites — and the rest of the species into the goyim, infidels, barbarians and the like. Again, Jews are not unique in fancying themselves as a “chosen” nation. Just think Muslims, or, in a somewhat different yet comparable fashion, the Chinese.

    What is unique about Jews as an old monotheistic nation isth dispersal and a diaspora existence for two millennia, which, of course, both traumatized them and made survival *by all means* the sine-qua-non of the whole national existence. Whether the hatred of all outsiders helped or impeded the overarching goal of the national survival is a question for both historic sociology and social psychology. I personally remain skeptical as to the value of actively fomenting hate as an effective adaptation strategy. Lies, cunning, unscrupulousness, the lack of principles and readiness for a quick betrayal – yes, but significant investments into the intergenerational transfer of ethnic hate would be counterproductive. Well known facts of Jews intermarrying with Gentiles, especially well placed and powerful Gentiles, confirm the cunning, rather than the hatred, aspect of adaptation.

    Same about blood sacrifices. There is no point of disputing that the tradition of blood sacrifices is alive and well among modern Jewry. See https://bit.ly/2LmTq6v on current practice of sheep sacrifice in Israel or https://bit.ly/2uL20BL on the search for a perfect red heifer for the ritual slaughter and purification. Both European and American Jews are at odds with animal rights activists and, occasionally, governments over their repeated insistence on chicken sacrifices.

    These practices are as obviously important for the religion as they are recognizably shamanistic, harking back to dark magic of the dark ages. Does this mean that Christian babies were ritualistically sacrificed — at the risk of complete destruction of a diaspora community — as a matter of tradition across Europe? I strongly doubt that. No judgment on the merits of the Dr. Toaff book, as I haven’t read it.

    As for a Jewish conspiracy theory on the origins of Bolshevism, it is, of course, a complete hoax, and I’m glad the article does not elaborate on it. Russian revolutionary tradition was not started by the Jews. The first attempt to overthrow the tsar to benefit the oppressed masses was undertaken by the Decembrists, the Russian nobles. The first Soviet Politburo, which was predominantly Jewish, was purged by Stalin. Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev and a bunch of others killed. The repressions, more in the vicinity of 1-2 million (rather than 60 or 80) shot over the whole 1935-53 time period targeted both Jewish and Russian members of the old party core and the first OGPU/NKVD command that Stalin prudently dispatched of.

    The Soviet Union was not run by Jews. It was not run by Russians either. Theodore Friedgut and others studied the relative proportion of Jews in the Soviet elite and confirmed they were overrepresented in the party and academia, while the Russians were underrepresented. At the same time, the party attacked both Zionism and what Lenin called “Great Russian chauvinism.” All anti-Zionist campaigns (for example, the 1950s fight with “no-homeland cosmopolitanism”) were balanced, right on their heels, with campaigns prosecuting alleged anti-Semites. It was only after the end of the Soviet Union when Jewish capitalists had openly and brazenly came to power and ran the country, bragging about their control of the nation’s economy (see Semibankirschina at Wikipedia). It is true, however, that, once the power of these Jewish oligarchs was somewhat limited by Putin (himself, apparently, a half-Jew), the ordinary Russians felt tremendous difference in their living standards. Which explains Putin’s lingering popularity today.

     
  47. @Anonymous
     

    ANONYMOUS

    Why then, do other countries complain of US cultural colonization and why the is US regarded (By you, for example) as controlling the world.

    To have such purported global influence they cannot be THAT dim.

    Malaysian cinema is not forming the opinions of the US, for example. And nobody cares what the foreign policy of India or Africa is.

    What makes the Hollywood films in more demand than those of Chile?

    Why the US global influence? Its not the US military intimidating other countries into purchasing US basketball shoes.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
     
    @Mulegino1
     
    @Anonymous
     
  48. hyperbola says:
    @Jared Eliot
     

    Jacob and other jews were not much different.

    Maidens and Warriors

    http://www.israelshamir.net/English/maidens.htm

    The Prophet’s love of his youngest wife, Aisha, causes much consternation in America; …. A modest Talmudic scholar from Jaffa, I would rise to his defence in the name of our Jewish tradition. Far from being a sinner, Muhammad (peace be upon him) acted according to the letter and the spirit of our holy faith. Biblical Jacob fell in love with Rachel when she was only seven, and brought forth from her a line of saints including Mary, mother of Christ.

    The Talmud stipulates the permitted age of marriage for girls at three years and one day. It brings us a dialogue worthy of Boccaccio that took place in Sepphoris of Galilee. A Roman princess Justine, daughter of Emperor Septimius Severus son of Anthony asked Rabbi Judah the Prince, the greatest spiritual and legal authority of Jews in the post-Biblical period, what is the permitted age of marriage and cohabitation.

    - Three years and one day, – replied the Rabbi.

    - What is the age for childbearing, – persisted the Princess.

    - Nine years [i], – he replied.

    - I was married at six, and gave birth at seven, – she reflected with great regret, – so I wasted in vain three excellent years of my young life.

    Muhammad’s wife, Aisha, wasted six years of her young life, as she was wed at nine. Thus, the Prophet demonstrated great prudence, also in full accordance with our Jewish teachings. Our holy Rabbis permitted very early marriage, but they were not absolutely sure that three-year old girls are sufficiently ripe. They taught: proselytes and paedophiles delay the Coming of the Messiah and of the Kingdom of Heaven.

    Who are the paedophiles in this context, asked the Talmud. They have to be persons of legitimate but objectionable behaviour, and therefore, not the sodomites (as they deserve death by stoning) nor masturbators (they merit watery grave). It is those who marry girls before the nubile age of nine. Thus, the Prophet is above suspicion according to our Jewish law.

    He had a few wives, continue the accusers. Well, the Jewish law permits us to have as many wives as we can get. Nowadays, a Muslim has to limit himself to four wives in this world, but we Jews have no such constrictions……

    • Replies: @bjondo
     
  49. Bukowski says:

    Yehudi Menuhin was a world famous violinist. His son Gerard Menuhin has now come out in support of holocaust revisionism.

    https://codoh.com/news/3347/

    He joins the growing number of Jews who are holocaust revisionists.

    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6912

     
  50. Crates says:
    @AaronB
     

    “A rapprochement between whites and Jews” might have happened if Jews agreed, voluntarily, to return a not negligible part of the wealth they accumulated at the expense of the host population in order to promote that population’s advancement to the same extent they promote the advancement of the Jewry. Since this is not a childish talk, we all know this is not going to happen. Stop manipulation of the nation’s politics and exploitation of its economy for group benefits. Again, not going to happen.
    As for the group warfare thing as “normal and natural”, first, it is a very Jewish argument to deflect and spread the blame and second, we are supposedly living in a society of equal opportunities with legal defense of basic human rights, no? Or is it also a “childish talk” to be ignored? Legitimation of “group warfare” as something normal leads to genocides – the practice that we all supposedly disapprove. Not to mention the whole principle runs against the spirit of the modern age. Living by the principles of group warfare in a society destroys the society in the final end, hence no group wins. It is collaboration that we should talk about, not group warfare. The problem is, all Jewish leaders prefer exploitation whenever possible, collaboration as a temporary measure and out of necessity.

     
  51. @Jeff Stryker
     

    The USA controlling a large part of the world is simple fact.
    The USA has over 800 military bases outside the USA.
    Then there is, or was, the Atlantic alliance, for example Dutch representatives complaining about intimidation by the USA ambassador.
    The why of USA world power, it began with the Monroe Declaration, then Manifest Destiny, then ‘leader of the free world’, bringing human rights and democracy, through death and destruction.
    From 1919, non ratification of Versailles, until 1932, FDR in politics, the USA was a peaceful country.
    Hope that with Trump a new peaceful era begins.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
     
  52. I’m under the impression that nearly all jews were literate in hebrew.
    This is the reason communism could spread in Russia and Poland among jews.

    • Replies: @Anon
     
  53. Rich says:
    @Crimson2
     

    How do you figure? Lower crime rates, higher educational standards, strong families, secure borders, putting a man on the moon, etc., looks like things were a lot better back when we had segregation.

     
  54. hyperbola says:
    @Talha
     

    Actually it seems to have been extremely weak in maintaining “group cohesion”. If the religion has been around for 4000 years, how come there are so few jews in the world? Simple – a major portion of each generation abandons the religion. One can even see this in the number of “jewish” Nobel prize winners that have abandoned the religion.

    This abandonment is exactly what one should expect for a minority mafia sect. First, most of the children tire of the brainwashing and do not wish to continue with the crimes of their elders. Second, a predatory sect has necessarily to be kept small in number compared to the general population.

    • Replies: @Talha
     
  55. bjondo says:
    @hyperbola
     

    thanks for the link. Shamir brilliant.

     
  56. @Echoes of History
     

    Except the Inquisitions did not start with the presumption a crime had been committed and did not twist and ignore the law and evidence to reach that conclusion.

    • Replies: @Echoes of History
     
  57. bjondo says:
    @Crimson2
     

    I handle Klan robes. My best customers are SPLC and ADL members followed by FBI.

    I don’t need competition.

     
  58. hyperbola says:
    @Art
     

    Many of the most egregious “crimes” of the Englishmen were in fact carried out by the jews of the City of London.

    Jewish banishment and the City of London

    http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=32142

    ….. A PRIVATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION exists today in England known as “The City.” It is also known as The Jewish Vatican located in the heart of Greater London:

    A Committee of 12 men rule The Jewish Vatican. They are known as “The Crown.” The City and its rulers, The Crown, are not subject to the Parliament. They are a Sovereign State within a State.

    The City is the financial hub of the world. It is here that the Rothschilds have their base of operations and their centrality of control:

    The Central Bank of England (controlled by the Rothschilds) is located in The City.
    * All major British banks have their main offices in The City.
    * 385 foreign banks are located in The City.
    * 70 banks from the United States are located in The City.
    London Stock Exchange is located in The City.
    * Lloyd’s of London is located in The City.
    * The Baltic Exchange (shipping contracts) is located in The City.
    * Fleet Street (newspapers & publishing) is located in The City.
    * The London Metal Exchange is located in The City.
    * The London Commodity Exchange (trading rubber, wool, sugar, coffee) is located in The City.

    Every year a Lord Mayor is elected as monarch of The City. The British Parliament does not make a move without consulting the Lord Mayor of The City. For here in the heart of London are grouped together Britain’s financial institutions dominated by the Rothschild-controlled Central Bank of England.

    The Rothschilds have traditionally chosen the Lord Mayor since 1820. Who is the present day Lord Mayor of The City? Only the Rothschilds’ know for sure…

    The Jewish Opium Trade and Britain

    http://satyricon20.tripod.com/sat33-Sassoon.htm

    • Replies: @Art
     
    @Thorfinnsson
     
  59. druid says:
    @mcohen
     

    mccohen,
    hardihar har har! You idiot!

     
  60. People give the Jews too much credit. Assuming the worst to be true (including blood libel), and leaving Israel aside (if that’s possible), the problem with American Jews is not their descent. It’s the unique circumstances, both cultural and genetic, that placed them at the forefront of the ideology destroying the West.

    As an analogy, Blacks’ failure to integrate into modern societies has nothing to do with the fact that their great-great-grandparents practiced voodoo, ate monkey brains or whatever. Likewise, there exists no large-scale conspiracy (excluding social-media organized flash mobs) behind Black crime.

    In the case of the Jews, you have a successful out-group with a strong identity. Like other successful, urban Whites they are – to use Haidt’s classification – very WEIRD (Western Educated Industrial Rich and Democratic). On top of the standard ‘WEIRDness’ you have the cult of the Holocaust, a quasi-minority identity and an extra level of antagonism to Christianity. How much is cultural and how much is genetic? Are Italians vivacious and Finns introverted because of culture or genetics or some sort of cultural-genetic feedback loop? My Jewish grandparents were just as racist as their Italian neighbors, and the Jews’ fellow White SJW are no less crazy, so there’s a strong case for culture.

    I’ve known a lot of Jews, but very few were at all religious. They’re just White people (or Levantine-Italian mutts, or Khazars or whatever – it’s irrelevant) that happen to be far more likely to fall into the category of urban-SJW-crazy. Conservatively maybe 80% compared to 30% for Whites. If, hundreds of years ago, the Jewish religion had not been so backward, exclusive, and antagonistic maybe they would have assimilated themselves out of existence. But if they had somehow survived without the worst of the Talmud I don’t see them being any different from what they are today.

    The Jews weren’t solely responsible for creating this mess (see the origins of Postmodernism), and American Jews will suffer from the policies they create no different from other Whites (correcting for SES). An urban Jewish family with a $120k income will be no better off in 2050 Brazilica than their White neighbors. In Western countries with large Muslim populations they will likely be worse off.

    The human world is much more disorganized than we’d like to believe. George Soros doesn’t have secret meetings with Mark Zuckerberg on how to destroy the West. Like Blacks and like-minded Whites, they’re just doing what they’re doing. They actually believe their own propaganda. That’s why so many marry Blacks FFS. (My 100% Ashkenazi brother-in-law just married a Black woman). Again, “never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.”

    I’m not saying I’m happy with the Jews (I’d emigrate to Israel if I could take the rest of them with me). I’m just saying they’re not a Satanic cult. The majority is indeed working to destroy the West, but it’s not because their great-great grandparent ritualistically killed Christian children to drain their blood. It’s much more complicated and much more disorganized than that.

    • Agree: Wizard of Oz
    • Replies: @anon
     
    @Rurik
     
    @Heros
     
    @Jeff Stryker
     
    @Bardon Kaldian
     
  61. Talha says:
    @hyperbola
     

    Which is what I stated in one of my points. This is one of the reasons it is so difficult to pin down, versus other religions, whether it is primarily a religious or ethno-linguistic identity. A person can claim to be an atheist Jew – as many do – but you can’t be an atheist Muslim or Christian.

    I spoke to a rabbi once about this; he made it clear they weren’t really in the market to try to convert others. The religion applies to them as a specific covenant between them and God to the exclusion of others. According to him; God has different expectations from them versus others.

    Trying to evaluate Judaism through the lens of a universal religious perspective doesn’t make sense – it falls far, far short. But then, it doesn’t claim to be a universal religion either, thus resulting in the small numbers. What you see is what you get.

    It’s like walking into a film about a courtroom drama and saying it sucks because it didn’t provide any jump scares.