If you want to archive a particular page just go to: https://archive.fo and paste the link.

This page was already archived through that service under: https://archive.fo/WOKif

…and you can download it by clicking “download .zip”.

597 [310] > If you’re not a Christian acknowledge the murders

they were certainly murdered, but they lived by the sword, so they died by…..

Royalty is Parasitism, isn’t it?

It’s a normal human (i.e., not Jewish) response to place more blame on the drug dealer, than on the junkie.

When illiterate Jews arrived at Ellis Island, their hatred for the cross and Christianity was so great that they refused to make the normal illiterate + mark as a signature, instead they made a circle, “kikel” in Yiddish

I suspect Jews were dominant through a combination of talent, solidarity, and motivation. Picture a choir with half or one third of the members singing from the same sheet, while the rest all sing random songs; what will be the “overwhelming” impression on listeners? They will hear two things; the song of the first group, and background noise.

This is nonsense. Ron Unz is easily the least Jewish Jew I have ever encountered. Yeah, he’s a disputatious intellectual, but then again, so am I. There is absolutely NO Jewish trend to be extrapolated from Ron’s behavior. He’s absolutely in a class of his own when it comes to Jews who criticize Jewry and Judaism. I have come across a pretty good number of Jews who criticize Jewry or Judaism over my 15 years as an online countersemite. They tend to fall into categories, and along a spectrum of loyalty to Jews, and I’ve never seen another one like Ron (though I suspect they exist, in small numbers).

I’m not saying this to butter Ron up; I have buttered Ron up before, and would happily do so again (he deserves it; I’m very grateful to him as our host, and for other things he’s done down through the years), but it’s not what I’m doing here. I’m saying this because it’s my honest take; Ron baffles me – I have never encountered a Jew who so thoroughly breaks with the tribe. He’s entirely consistent with a Jew who simply does not give any particular fuck about Jews, being a Jew, or softening the blow for Jewry. The behavior in and of itself is not baffling at all – it makes perfect sense. The baffling part is that he is also, at the same time, of Jewish extraction. In every other instance in my experience, Jews have, at some point, sided with their tribe over humanity; they may call Jews onto the carpet, and they certainly tread onto the “ANTISEMITISM!!!” carpet (what honest and aware man hasn’t?), but they have all been warm, to a certain extent, to Jews. They all have a point where they say, “this far, and no further.” Ron is the only Jew I’ve ever encountered who more or less writes like an Aryan countersemite; he writes about Jews with the voice of the other, as we do. I’ve never encountered someone who so thoroughly embodies the usually-disingenuous phrase, “who also happens to be Jewish.” I may have Ron completely wrong, but the impression I get is that he isn’t a Jew; he’s an American who happens to have been born to the Tribe.

As for your point about monolithic Judaism, I never find that sort of thing persuasive. We went to war with Germany over Nazism, and killed many thousands of Germans as a result. Nobody gave a fuck about monolithic Germans, or lack thereof. But I’m supposed to stop and quibble because G-d’s Chosen are in the dock? Fuck that.

Straw man. This was pulled out of your ass and doesn’t deserve to be taken seriously.

no we can’t – and that’s the problem (and it’s a practical problem not a moral one)

where does the interest come from?

with money lending that increases the productive capacity of an economy the interest can come out of that increase -> win-win

however money lending for consumption the interest can only come out of the existing economy so it acts as a wealth transfer mechanism over time – concentrating wealth from borrowers to lenders – problem being when wealth gets too concentrated the economy stagnates cos no demand.

(this is where the Parsi charity thing had two benefits: reducing resentment but also putting money back into circulation)

not blaming anyone – the money-lending niche would exist without Jews but trying to survive as a minority gave Jews more of an incentive to dominate that niche cos wealth = security.

What are the Jews going to do? Put Ron on double-secret probation? I’m sure they already wanted his nuts floating in a jar of formaldehyde.

Excellent point but I’d turn it around. It’s the hostility (dehumanisation and fear of the host) that’s keeping the lesser gypsies/jews from assimilating.

The smart ones are assimilating while the dumbfucks still need the dysgenic crutch. In terms of evolutionary strategy and procreation - it’s the rejects who (almost always) have to cheat.

A great many do not. More to the point, it takes about five minutes to get saved; no need to be born to the Master Race, cut off your foreskin, or spend years studying a thousand-year-old set of encyclopedias.

P.S., you skipped over the slavery thing.

Cool, thx.

I’ve been a countersemite for more than 15 years, and I’d never heard this one. I knew there were Zionists and Zionist organizations who cooperated with the Third Reich to varying degrees, but until now I had no idea that a former Israeli PM, a founding one, wanted to work with Hitler.

I’m going to bring this up every time a Zionist crows about connections between Hitler and Arabs/Palestinians.

No problem. Just make sure to save important stuff locally. Online archives are also getting purged of wrongthink regularly. This was never supposed to be easy. 

I have to take issue with this. No matter how powerful, accomplished, connected, and wealthy it becomes, diaspora Jewry is never secure. Its power always relies upon the consent of the governed, so to speak. That power is always soft power that could blow away in a political wind in moments. This is baked into the Jewish cake – it’s the inevitable consequence of Jewish separatism and elitism. You can’t have both the numbers, and be an elite. You can’t be both exclusive, and inclusive. The Jewish diaspora is always one political sea change away from a total loss of power. That’s a big part of why they’re always on the offensive. Which is of course also why their history is so “lachrymose.”

At some point the Jewish elite, the head, detached itself from the Jewish body and decided to live by attaching itself to humanity’s body. The world has been suffering the consequences of that decision ever since. Israel offers Jews a third option (1 and 2 being Judaism and assimilation), the opportunity to be a real, independent people again.

The problem with this sort of response is the fucking-over Jews have given Christianity and Whites with their intellectual output over the years. By Jews’ own standards, they deserve this article from Ron, about a million times over.

I see that my image was Shoah’d. Curious. After trying a few other image hosts, let’s try this one:

This seems naive. I.e., it seems divorced from actual experience with Jews, who will, almost to a man, deny, obfuscate, distract, dissimulate, ignore and dismiss accusations about the behavior in question…everything but respond in a way that they demand from whites in reciprocal situations (evangelize on the subject and fight for change, etc.). On the contrary, they are entirely more likely to accuse the critic of “ANTISEMITISM!!!” and work to have the entire subject deemed “ANTISEMITIC!!!”

Shahak could have lived for a thousand years, totally devoted them to this topic, and never been anything but a drop in the bucket compared to the exaggerations of Jews about the “ANTISEMITISM!!!” (and other “pathologies”) of the peoples they have chosen to follow wherever they are found.

My response to your points 3-9 is similar: let the Jews be treated as they have treated us.

THIS. A thousand times, this.

Time to throw Jewry on the couch and do to them for the next hundred years what they’ve done to us for the past hundred.

Though I think the transcript should be known ahead of time to be for the benefit of humanity, and not Jewry, because Jewry are immune to the sort of inquisition they’ve subjected us to; the purpose of the New Inquisition will be to undo the achievements of the Old.

That’s a very interesting graphic, and I’d appreciate a pedigree. I’m surprised at how many Jews agreed. Hell, I’m surprised at how many agree in every category, really. That said, it’s worth noting that BLACKS and ASIANS agreed at significantly higher rates than Jews.

Right-leaning Whites and Jews are obviously natural enemies.

Christian Hell is almost entirely a figment of doctrine. There is no real Scriptural basis for it. The “divorced from God” thing is much more in line with Scripture.

1) I’m basically an atheist (intellectually agnostic, in every other way basically atheist, well, kinda…it’s complicated (I kinda buy the Jungian sense of God and religion)), and I’m also culturally Christian and simpatico with non-heretical (most Christians are heretics) Christians.

2) Communists despised National Socialism more than anything, but few anti-Communists are sympathetic to National Socialism, so it’s not all that hard to understand the phenomenon you’re describing.

Also, what an amazing picture of insanity this article’s comments add up to; and amazing how essentially no other sites on the whole internet have picked it up. Instead it is essentially only mentioned on some of the more rabid commenters’ personal projection spaces.

Equally “amazing” was the massive DDoS attack that besieged this site shortly following Ron’s publication of this article.

Were it as irrelevant as you imply, why the desperate attempt to prevent others from reaching it? And why has Ron’s traffic surpassed that of more mainstream sites?

The hatred is the result of anxiety & fear. Throw in some sense of supremacy (chosen ones) and it’s 99% effective.

This is the Tribe’s “clever” secret. It works… until it doesn’t.

Just to add more fuel to the fire that Ron has started, i present this link below. Make sense now why the Palestinians are in such trouble, too bad the Americans have also become the most useful tool!

https://russia-insider.com/en/history/god-israel-bloodthirsty-vindictive-sociopath-does-explain-misanthropy-jews/ri24154

England is not the mother country of Italians, Polish, Germans and Irish-Catholics in the Northern United States. We don’t even share your ethnicity as fellow whites. Colonial era means nothing to us. We are not from England and we do not care about the UK like you Southerners who go on about the colonial era.

Screw you, asshole.

My ancestors came from Denmark. My grandpappy understood that coming to America (founded by the English) we all had a DUTY to be grateful to the people who kindly let us in, to show THEM our loyalty, including loving their history as much as they do, taking it on as our own. If the Americans care about colonial era and UK, then, by God, so do we.

My grandpappy assimilated the second his feet hit American soil, so much so that no one in his household was ALLOWED to speak Danish. “We speak English in this house,” immediately corrected anyone who lapsed into Danish. And he did not allow the kids to be happy about any holidays or traditions but the ones in THIS country that was so kind as to adopt us, so we adopt back.

Anybody who thinks different ought to go back.

The problem is in the idea that God loves only you and cares only for you!

Aaron’s comments make a lot more sense when you substitute “human” for “gentile,” but it’s not really necessary to do so to notice that he’s absorbed the Jews’ view of reality (humanity vs. Jews).

I do it too, I guess; but from the other side of the fence.

https://russia-insider.com/en/politics/untold-history-murder-last-tsar-and-his-family-which-media-have-been-hiding-you/ri24181

Anybody have another source on this one before I repeat it as verified truth?
If true, it is really a penetrating insight on the nature of Jewish Bolsheviks.

Some (few) Jews, like most European gentiles, are neither tribal nor ashamed of their ethnic ancestry. That is, they are not ashamed of their ethnic background, but it does not form a major part of their “identity.” Like eye-color, it is something they think very little about with regard to themselves or others, and they certainly do not discriminate in favor of people of their own ethnic background or seek to advance the interests of their own ethnic group.

Blacks became America’s problem when Yankees invaded, burned, and conquered the South and set Blacks free.

Had to Fix That For You.

P.S., the vast majority of “ANTISEMITES!!!” are Yankees.

“I knew it.”– Lt. Frank Drebin, Police Squad.

Absolutely. Very old principle. We did not need Freud to reinvent it as a projection. Also Stalin did not invent it. He just noticed that his opponents were guilty of it. Do not get me wrong: I do not defend Stalin. He is beyond any defense. But it is misleading to quote it outside of the context he used it.

The assertion that Gypsies were driven out of India because their behaviors were unacceptably bad is based on nothing at all. First of all, yes, there have been castes and secret groups in India that behaved terribly. Cf. the Thugs. And they were not “driven out.” Who would do the driving??
But AFAIK we have no idea why this particular untouchable caste that became the Gypsies was forced to migrate, or chose to do so. Perhaps they were always nomads in an area that was becoming settled. Perhaps there was a demographic pressure of some kind. Perhaps they resisted some local ruler. Perhaps some other caste wanted to force t his caste to an evne lower status. Perhaps it was a conflict in styles worship—there are, or were, before Modi started imposing the Hindu hegemony, hundreds of religions in India. AFAIK we don’t know. Or, I don’t know and I bet you don’t know. It is pretty hard to develop hypotheses when there is virtually no archaeological evidence.

Are you an expert in the extremely complex social history of the area that is the modern state of India?
Your statements sound like a perfect example of the hoary adage, “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/9719058/European-Roma-descended-from-Indian-untouchables-genetic-study-shows.html

Given the superstition rife throughout Europe during the Middle Ages and the viciousness of the Talmud toward non-Jews, it is plausible that some Jewish communities did engage in some ritualistic murder and blood-drinking of Christians. The question is empirical and should be evaluated and answered according to the evidence, not dismissed as “antisemitic” at the outset.

My maternal great-grandparents immigrated from Germany to America and spoke German. Of course, my grand-father was raised to speak English. My paternal grand-parents immigrated from Mexico (a weird combo am I– all women are weak-minded and should live at home until they marry– that way, their father can run off any unsuitable suitors). My father refused to teach us Spanish. He did not want us to be little Mexican-Americans, but Americans. Sad and tragic that we have devolved to the point where we are today.

I think it is established that the bacterium that caused the Black Death entered Europe first through the Crimea. It originated in China.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/206309.php

At the time, no one knew what caused it.

https://flutrackers.com/forum/forum/welcome-to-the-scientific-library/pandemics-in-literature/21952-the-bubonic-plague-and-the-impact-on-venice:

“By 1334, the plague had destroyed two thirds of China’s population and successive waves of the plague after 1348 took the lives of roughly one third of Southern Europeans.”

it is possible that Poland was relatively spared from the plague because it was not a trading nation . . .
This view is mentioned at the following link, but there are other reasons, such as an effective quarantine:

https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/16699/why-was-poland-spared-from-the-black-death

And another image was Shoah’d without a trace. Curious, again.

After trying to upload it to multiple image-hosting services and encountering “this image is forbidden” let’s put it in text-form:

Blacks became Americas’ problem the moment when they have been brought in to America. It is a self-inflicted problem.

It’s not my assertion.

I’m just a holycaust skeptic, not even an amateur revisionist, and I know more about revisionism than you do. E.g., most revisionists don’t debunk the narrative about the Einsatzgruppen the way they do the narrative about gas chambers or death camps. You can’t swing a stick in a crowd of revisionists without hitting a bunch of guys who basically limit the “genocide” of the Nazis to the Einsatzgruppen’s efforts on the eastern front.

E.g., the basic revisionist position is not “the holocaust didn’t happen,” but that the orthodox narrative is sloppily supported, not supported, etc. The logical position for anything is that it doesn’t exist, unless it is shown to exist.

Your questions are amusing; why relocate people you intend to murder? Why take them off the trains alive at all? Why not simply kill them on the train? Then you have no need for camps at all. That’s an enormous cost savings right there. Why relocate people you intend to mass murder?

Lots of people try to put a psychiatric veneer on their philo-semitism or anti-antisemitism. It’s really rather tedious.

Had to TL;DR the rest of your comment for now – I’ve read enough philo-semitic boilerplate for fifty lifetimes already.

Yes, Martin Luther would definitely agree with you that the Church hierarchy was cucked by Jew money.

said:
“*(please don’t tell me that Einstein was a fraud and a charlatan. He may not have been the smartest man who ever lived, [as the Jewish supremacists would have us believe], but he was very smart indeed, and yet as a mild form of Zionist, he spoke with tenderness and justice about the terrible plight of the Palestinians).”

But I will, he was a fraud and a plagiarist, charlatan too.

Yeah, I guess at least a few brain cells are required to be so.

So, why do you call him a “giant”?

Or is that ‘giant hustler’.

Or ‘giant racist’? :
Fake Jew icon Einstein was rabidly racist, xenophobic

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/jun/12/einsteins-travel-diaries-reveal-shocking-xenophobia

Jew IQ is largely a myth established by marketing and media control, starting with the Einstein brand. The myth is necessary to justify and conceal Jewish tribal nepotism as the main factor establishing dominance of a hostile elite in host nations.

Albert Einstein was a Fraud

http://coconutrevival.com/?p=5656

and

and
Einstein, plagiarist of the century

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm

Whatever the ancestors of the children of Nicholas did, nothing in the history of Russia surpassed what the Jewish communists did between 1918 and 1959 in Russia and E European countries after WW1 when their shietluved comnunjsts regimes were swiftly overthrown and after WW2 when the soviet troops were given lists of people to vekikked by the Jewish communist resistance to the German occupation

Jew Eisner slaughtered 10,000 people in Munich in 1918. Bela Kun did the same in Hungary.
You do realize that liberal propaganda against all Whites portrays us as the same vicious oppressors as liberals have portrayed the Czars.

I’ve read a bit about it. This is just my opinion The Gypsies probably left because the Muslims cracked down in their scams and cons

Another thing would be women. In Muslim culture the women stay home and only go out for necessary shopping, family visits whatever

But in gypsy culture the women and small children are hanging about the streets all day accosting everyone begging picking pockets shoplifting picking up and selling stolen goods and running all sorts of scams

It appears the gypsies were just looking to broaden the base of suckers

according to the University of Virginia. The first ship Jamestown 1619 was a Dutch ship. And the judge who legalized slavery in Virginia 1654 was an English judge appointed by English authorities. And the plaintiff who brought the law suit that made his black servabt a shave was Antoine Johnson a lack man from Angola

Slavery was imposed on America by England when we were a colony.

Of course the few colonials who could afford to get into the slave trade were very enthusiastic

They’re the same thing, doctrinally speaking, and the “Scriptural” basis for both is therefore the same.

That’s why the moment Americans regained independence from the oppressive England they rejected slavery that was foreign and abhorrent to them.

What’s your take on the “blood libel”? My unresearched tentative – I would call secular common sense – view is that there would have been some such practices in the medieval world given the widespread persecution of witches, grisly tortures and executions such as hanging, drawing and quartering, belief on magic….. and the still existing relics of such thinking in gamblers’ lucky charms and Chinese feng shui.

A dilemma for Jews is whether it is worth expunging the reality of some primitive pre Enlightenment Jewish practices at the expense of being resented for using Jewish media power and general influence to falsify history. Getting a church which still teaches transubstantiation and the direct acceptance of “saints” into “heaven” to simply deny the “blood libels” was possibly necessary for temporary anti anti Semitic purposes and all that could be done with Christian institutions that aren’t about to forswear belief in ancient and medieval myth and magic????

In Somerset’s Case in England Lord Chief Justice Mansfield is famously quoted as saying “The air of England is too pure for a slave to breathe, let the black go free”.

I wasn’t aware of the Virginia judge’s decision. Who? Appointed by whom? (1654 was during the Cromwellian Commonwealth). Of course “England” didn’t have much control over its freebooting aristocrats and entrepreneurs so I wonder about your “imposed in America by England”. Come to think of it, how did it come about at Independence that some were slave states and some were not? Imposed by England?

CARPENTER’S SOCIAL PREDICTIONS

Escape From New York

Kurt Russell reflected the new veteran. Forgotten by his country and thrown on the scrap heap while endless wars continued.

They Live

This was about the class wars of the 80′s and the rise of poverty and joblessness in the era of the Yuppie. See Carpenter’s commentary.

Prince of Darkness

Beneath the religious trappings was the reality of homelessness.

It appears that a ruler of North India, not the Muslims, drove the gypsies out in the 9th or 10th century.

By the time they entered Iran-from which they borrowed some of their language-they were so undesirable that they were quickly driven further West until they congregated in Southeaster Europe.

North India of course is a constant turmoil of invaders-Aryans, Scythian, Greek. So the poster who remarked of the complicated history around the Punjab is correct.

As for Parsi, they received permission from the an Indian King to enter India and are a tiny business elite minority who only intermarried between themselves-until recently when hemophilia led to a law that they HAD to marry non-Parsi.

Generally, they got buy doing business. Not really social parasites at all. Tata and some of the biggest companies in India are owned by Parsi.

Nope. That’s like saying the animals in a zoo or the inmates in a prison became a problem the moment they were brought to the zoo or prison, thus absolving the psychos who broke into the zoo/prison, shot all the guards, and freed all the animals or prisoners of responsibility.

Complete horseshit.

Yankees made ABSOLUTELY SURE that a potential problem became an actual disaster. That’s where the blame lies.

It appears some North Indian king kicked the gypsies out of India before the Muslims arrived.

Well not all the nondenominational churches. There are some that expressly reject dual covenant theology. They usually have healthy, good looking congregations. They also get bashed in media coverage for not embracing homosexuality in leadership positions.

There’s an unbridgeable gulf between death/separation from God and an eternity roasting in hellfire. One is basically “Heaven or nothing,” the other is “Heaven or Hell.”

NOT JEWISH-

Why don’t Jews complain of credit card debt, then?

Why don’t Jews complain that pornography is ruining their marriages, since they are so over-represented in porn?

Why don’t Jews complain that Mexicans are taking their jobs, since they are still classified as white and cannot be Affirmative Action hires?

Why aren’t Jews hooked on methamphetamine or Oxy? Crack cocaine was largely an urban East Coast scourge but it largely affected blacks.

Why aren’t Jewish girls have children out-of-wedlock if the media and Leftist pundits are attacking the family?

Why aren’t Jewish girls in interracial relationships to the same degree as white prole girls?

It’s always a pretty good assumption that when a people is driven out by another, it’s for bad behavior. It’s not a law of the universe or anything, but it’s a good guess.

I mean “bad behavior” in a neutral way: for shit the group doing the driving saw as bad.

Obviously it could just be a power struggle (another good assumption, actually).

Assimilation is the duty of the alien/minority population; guests should always be more sensitive to their hosts than the other way around, and for good reason.

If it wasn’t for the North, the South would have continued to import slaves until the South was 90% black.

Well, to choose the spiritual life means to do just that. You expand the circle of your ego to include everyone. There is no more gentile hating Jew or Jew hating Polish Catholic. This is the source of compassion – not to have no ego, which is impossible, but to have so large an ego that it includes everyone.

Its not so much that there are no more sides, its that everyone is now on your side – you see everyone as implicated in your self-interest.

This is the vision of all great religions, including Judaism. St Thomas Aquinas is no more being true to Christianity when he says the virtuous will delight in watching the torments of sinners than some Talmudic sage is when he says one need not return change to a gentile if he overpaid you and did not notice it.

Is this difficult?

Yes and no.

On the one hand, not participating in the universal war means probably suffering at least some exploitation. But it opens you up to wonder, magic, joy, beauty, love.

On the other hand, choosing to participate in the universal war means constant bad moods and anxiety, and to be cut off from beauty, wonder, and joy. This is the chronic state of most of humanity for most of history – chronic joylessness – and certainly nearly everyone on this blog. But you will be better able to avoid exploitation.

Of course, as long as you are a living being you cannot entirely choose not to participate in the universal war, but one can reduce it to an absolute minimum.

That is why I support some kind of nationalism – it reduces the universal war. Individualism appears to be an improvement over nationalism, but it merely increases overall warfare by pitting everyone against everyone and destroying any principle of cooperation.

But nationalism still creates war and is hardly an ideal. It is merely a stage in the process.

And I believe each one of us is engaged in a process – ultimately, we all will increase the circle of our ego to include everyone.

But everything must be evaluated as part of a process – it may be good at some points, bad at others. Right now nationalism is good – in a few decades, it may represent a regression.

But you are correct that outside of the spiritual life, and sunk in materialism, there is only the war of all against all, which is inescapable.

“Lutheran Social Services”

St. Paul has the same problems as Sweden with Muslim refugees? What is the origin of these Lutherans in Minnesota? Is their last name Rebowitz or is it Palsson?

I’m guessing the latter.

“Vermont and Maine”

I don’t think Hispanics will adapt to Vermont or Maine as easily as Phoenix, Arizona and more of them will return home for the age-old reason of climate. Well, we can always hope.

“Stuck in the 1960′s”

Actually, I’m stuck in the 1990′s. Even in the 1990′s Hispanics-or basically Amerindians-had not overrun the United States from New Mexico up to New Brunswick. This, I suspect, is a result of NAFTA.

Somalians came in the 1990′s. This was not a phenomenon of the sixties.

So where is the relentless persecution of the Jews in the Middle Ages? In reality they have always been protected both by ecclesiastical and temporal powers. Their status in Christian societies was regulated by the privileges inherited from the Roman Law. Popular rebellions against Jews were motivated by a perception that they were too much protected.

Like other quasi-British colonies, the South probably would have become like Rhodesia.

It was only because the Industrial base was in the North and they chose to import immigrants at slave wages like the Italians or the Irish, that the South did not eventually find itself in the situation that Zimbabwe or South Africa did.

And if you look at the situation of poor whites in places like Detroit or Atlanta, I’d say it is a runner up third place to that of Boers in SA.

The really poor Polish-American retirees or the absolute lowest income white Southerners are in harm’s way.

If the South had imported Italians or Polish for slave wages like the Northern US did to fuel its industrial base than there would have been no zoo to begin with.

If Polish and Italian and Irish had been paid to pick cotton, it is unlikely there would be a zoo. The Italians are a semi-Latino people with some cultural differences, but these were relatively minor.

The Einsatz Gruppen.

What is said about them is based on the testimonies of twelve of the asserted 1000 members of these asserted Gruppen, in the Neurenberg show.
Anyone who knows how these testimonies were given places big question marks by their truth.

Then there are the asserted mass killings and mass graves.
Who takes the trouble to read Poliakov, his story is based on the Neurenberg testimonies, regularly finds sentences as ‘all 40.000 were shot’, by a Gruppe of 50 to 100 men.
Try to imagine how this was done.
Who covered the bodies with earth, it is not mentioned.
Then there is the story that when the Russian army advanced ‘special groups with special fluids’ were sent to open the graves, and destroy the bodies completely.
No evidence left.

As to the pictures, Churchill had a propaganda studio in Canada.

Then there is the weird phenomenon that the reports on the highly secret mass killings were distributed in about a hundred copies.

Protected, simply not true.
Around 1100 or so jews were expelled from Britain.
Around 1500 from the Iberian peninsula.
If they were relentlessly persecuted, in my opinion not.
But pogroms, spontaneous, or organised, did occur.
Why and how, by whom, seldom clear, except in Russia after 1860, liberated serfs ran into debts by jews, who sold their properties.
The church protecting jews, a fairy tale.
Jews were an eyesore, anyone could see that the pope was not almighty.
And, even in the sixties of the last century my wife, catholic origin, was taught in a Dutch catholic primary school ‘that jews were bad, they killed the son of god’.

Ok you make good sense and I agree soros types care more about painting muslims as militants they can use against others etc.

That’s speculation. “Oh, the South woulda this, the South was gonna that.” I can speculate that the end result would have been expatriation and emancipation, in that order. Or that the South would have seen the writing on the wall and forced the sale of all slaves to back to Africa.

What isn’t speculation is that the Yankees closed off all possible good outcomes by invading the south, waging total war, winning, and…turning blacks loose on America.

Supposedly “woke” Yankees have a huge problem admitting this, but fuck their unexamined, phony pride. Time to work through it, boys.

At Russia Insider website the site owners article, also published here at unz, called “Time to Stop jew taboo” or close to that title has reached a massive Over 2,050+ Replies!!! I never saw any article with close to that number any place.

I’m not sure what your point is. If it’s that Jews are normal, you need to brush up on your stats.

the Atlantic slave trade was started by the people who used to run the white slave trade centered on Moorish Spain.

after they got kicked out of Spain they set up new sugar plantations on the Portuguese owned Atlantic islands.

(i think the slavery-sugar connection may go back 3000+ years all the way to Yemen/Bahrain)

credit card debt:
larger percentage involved in finance
smaller percentage with high time preference

mexicans taking their jobs:
not their jobs

opiodes:
not their jobs being off-shored

out of wedlock kids:
IQ and time preference

jewish girls and inter-racial relationships:
most inter racial violence (which includes sexual bullying) is in integrated prole schools

a group with (on average) higher IQ, lower time preference and higher SES promoting harmful behaviors which are harmful in inverse proportion to IQ, time preference, SES etc will harm competitor groups more than they harm themselves – if they see weakening those other groups as a necessary preemptive self-defense against possible future persecution then they may see their (smaller) casualty rate as acceptable – they might even see their casualties from promoting harmful behaviors as eugenic as long as it’s lower than competitors.

i don’t know about child sacrifice – it was definitely a thing in the Levant at one time but changing to circumcision as an alternative seems highly plausible to me (which would seem to remove the motive) – although in Carthage it apparently died out but was revived later after defeats by Rome were blamed on not doing it any more.

i find it much easier to believe someone spying on a teeth circumcision mistakenly thought they were eating the baby.

seems more cyclical than relentless, often related to aristos removing their customary protection (often cos they owed money)

so relentless hostility from the peasantry maybe but only cyclical hostility from the aristocracy.

“I think it is established that the bacterium that caused the Black Death entered Europe first through the Crimea. It originated in China.”

The problem is that there were two strains. Please, read the link I provided, or just search from the web, two strains, spreading too fast, one coming from Crimea (where it was not spread by the rats but by bodies thrown to the city), but the second one appearing first in Holland, proposed that it came from Norway! (no ingenious plague in Norway, too cold there, it was taken to Holland from somewhere). You study the issue more and maybe you will change your opinions. There is the exact text from Jacob Frank that his group intentionally spread the plague in the 18th century. I ask you, why do you people try to deny everything?

Wizard, from all pro-Israel trolls you are by far the most intelligent and the one I prefer to discuss with. There indeed was Jewish ritual sacrifice. It was a Cabbalistic practice and not so widespread in Judaism, you may say it was pre-modern Judaism, but not pre-Talmud, nor pre-Zorah. You have to read Isiah, and notice that for redemption Isiah suggest that other people die (read Isiah 43:4). It is also true that later redemption required a blood sacrifice (read Zechariah 9:11 , and do not imagine I have not read the Bible several times from one end to the other, I know it almost by hearth). There were people, Cabbalistic Rabbies, not as intelligent and cultured as you, who did these things. It was gthe Middle Ages. By the way, talking about witches in Europe, all original witches were destroyed with the exception of Finnish and Lappish witches (simple hunting magic). All Medieval European witchcraft was of Jewish origins, so here you have it, from scientific research. Killing babies for flying ointment, that originated in the Middle East, all those things originated in the Middle East and Greece.

“It’s always a pretty good assumption that when a people is driven out by another, it’s for bad behavior. It’s not a law of the universe or anything, but it’s a good guess.”

Actually, it is a pretty silly “guess.”
I should think “driving out” another group is also “bad behavior.”
For example, if they control resources that the driving-out group covets.
Such as how colonizers “drive out” indigenous.
“Good guesses” do not history make.
Documentation that the gypsies were “driven out” at all?

The subject being as vast as it is touchy for the “lachrymose conception of Jewish history” (as coined by Salo Wittmayer Baron, “the greatest Jewish historian of the 20th century”), start with the Wikipedia entry ‘Sicut Judaeis’:

“Sicut Judaeis (Latin: “As the Jews”) was a papal bull setting out the official position of the papacy regarding the treatment of Jews.
The first bull was issued in about 1120 by Calixtus II and was intended to protect Jews. It was prompted by the First Crusade, during which over five thousand Jews were slaughtered in Europe. The words sicut Judaeis (“and thus to the Jews”) were first used by Pope Gregory I (590-604) in a letter addressed to the Bishop of Naples. Even then the Pope emphasized that Jews were entitled to “enjoy their lawful liberty.”
The bull was reaffirmed by many popes including Alexander III, Celestine III (1191-1198), Innocent III (1199), Honorius III (1216), Gregory IX (1235), Innocent IV (1246), Alexander IV (1255), Urban IV (1262), Gregory X (1272 & 1274), Nicholas III, Martin IV (1281), Honorius IV (1285-1287), Nicholas IV (1288-92), Clement VI (1348), Urban V (1365), Boniface IX (1389), Martin V (1422), and Nicholas V (1447).
The bull forbade Christians, on pain of excommunication, from forcing Jews to convert, from harming them, from taking their property, from disturbing the celebration of their festivals, and from interfering with their cemeteries.
The bull of 1120 was not the first papal expression against the mistreatment of Jews. In 1065, for example, Pope Alexander II wrote to Béranger, Viscount of Narbonne, and to Guifred, bishop of the city, praising them for having prevented the massacre of the Jews in their district, and reminding them that God does not approve of the shedding of blood. In 1065 also, Alexander admonished Landulf VI of Benevento “that the conversion of Jews is not to be obtained by force.”

I am not “you people,” Whatever that is supposed to mean
And I read, actually, that there were four strains of the bacterium/disease.

Pardon my skepticism, but the Jacob Frank source doesn’t look very reliable to me.

Obviously, there have been plenty of criminal, lunatic and evil Jews. That’s life.

I don’t get why any Jew would think that Christian blood would have holy properties though. If anything, it would be the other way around. Christianity’s most important moment is the sacrifice of a Jew and the ritual drinking of his blood as wine. The blood libel’s most likely explanation is as a bizarre Christian unconscious projection onto the other.

Indeed, for a religion founded on replacing human sacrifice with tokenistic animal sacrifice, it makes even less sense for there to be some sort of human blood ritual.

I have also seen in my lifetime how panics, hysterias and imagined scares spread.

So I am sceptical that it ever happened. It is also entirely irrelevant to the religion as it is very obviously unsupported by any texts.

As for expunging pre-Enlightenment Jewish nonsenses, I am not for it. Being Reform, I hardly could be! I am sure that there was a lot of nonsense and indeed a lot of evil and horror and craziness.

I am obviously going to be a bit taken aback when somebody says that it was somehow especially bad. Firstly, it wasn’t, anyone who looks at history can see the context. Secondly, the people who do so always seem to be calling for great evil now.

Anyway, as a great believer in Enlightement values, I instinctively prefer light and open discussion to anything else. At the same time, a number of people on this thread are either trolls pretending to be psychotic or they actually are psychotic, and it would be better for everyone if people with psychoses were focussed on aliens and other fictional beings as opposed to rounding up and killing other humans.

I don’t know where the line is between enlightened debate and merely feeding lunatics’ psychoses but I feel that this article probably straddles it.

They’re trying to genocide us. So much for the Jewish IQ.

There may be to you, but there is not in Christian (or Jewish, as far as I am aware) doctrine. Do you ever reflect as to what “separation from God” might actually mean?

IQ & Time Preference

Yep, I made you say it.

The traffic is nothing compared to Slate or Salon and the DDoS attacks are, given that they about as easy and unsophisticated as it gets, very unlikely to be made by a powerful actor. What will they do to escalate? Send a handwritten strongly worded letter?

“I read, actually, that there were four strains of the bacteriug m/disease.
Pardon my skepticism, but the Jacob Frank source doesn’t look very reliable to me.”

The argument is the following. There is a known case in England where the plague bacterium in the time of the Black Death was obtained from a package of textile sent from the continent, showing that the bacteria could survive without any living creatures for a long enough time. Selling infected textiles could explain the fast spread of the disease better than rats, as we do have an estimate how fast rats spread it from the 3rd pan-epidemia. There is an explicit text from Jacob Frank showing that this method of transmission is possible. You say his words are not very reliable here? Why is that, he writes from his experiences to his followers, it should be fairly reliable or at least, other Frankists could have done so following their master.

Maybe you read that there were four strains, I read that there were two strains in the Black Death and they are placed in the DNA tree of the plague bacterium, neither strain exists today. This might have changed, it was so some months ago when I checked. Probably you mean that there are four strains of plague. Yes, but not all of them were in Europe in the 14th century, The problem is that the epidemia had two strains, not one.

My apologies from alluding to you people. I said once so in the USA in a hotel, you people do not know how to use a credit card (which was true by the way). These Americans got mad: they are not you people. I guess I should have said you hotel people or something. Americans are very touchy. Very. Especially some.

OK, so “you people” means Americans.
Not particularly American, and not particularly touchy. But always interested in actual documentation. Let’s leave the Middle Ages, shall we?
I provided a ink already but I guess the link indicated I was too touchy for you to access it!

I think the purposeful spread of plague via an infected item is quite unlikely, because anyone doing the spreading would, obviously, be exposing him-/herself to the infection. Such “spreading” would also presuppose that the spreader had some understanding of the concept of infection by a germ or bacterium or tiny “thing” that could cling to something and spring to another human. I don’t think anyone had such understanding in the 14th century, but if he/she did, common sense would dictate that he/she would not be purposefully handling items tainted by the disease-creating thing. Even the idea of washing hands before and after handing sick people to avoid spreading disease and infection such as gangrene did not occur to anyone until Lister (1827–1912) came along.

For some scientific info on the genesis and DNA of Yersinia pestis, with an interesting map:

https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.705

Indeed scepticism is appropriate but it doesn’t overcome the damned if you do, damned if you don’t, dilemma for Jews contemplating using pressure to impose censorship. Sophisticated PR is obviously very difficult to employ effectively but it’s a pity that the response can’t be to say “sure it’s not impossible that some medieval outliers amongst Jews were as deranged as the contemporary witchburners or as the 20th century Jonestown suicides, or even Islamist fanatics, but they were never part of mainstream Judaism even at it’s most alienated from host societies etc….”

Ok, sorry, Skeptical. You are not touchy, you just are not “you people”, that’s all. I understand.

I did not pay attention to your link in your comment but will look at it.

Your argument that no people before the knowledge of germs could have been intentionally spreading the disease is shown incorrect by the writing of Jacob Frank that you ignore. You find there exactly a case when he advised his people to spread the plague (by selling infected items to Christians) and avoid being infected themselves (obviously by imposing some rules). I do not think Jacob Frank had an idea of germs, so avoiding being infected did not presuppose having an idea of germs. It required following a set of ritual cleanliness rules.

I will look at your map, but can you look at the spread of the Black Death and try to invent a good reason why it omitted Poland (apart from the fact that some people were expelled from most of Europe and allowed to Poland, an irrelevant coincidence). Poland does not have natural boundaries, indeed the plague did spread there later. Quarantine methods can work in a city (like in Italy), but not in the scale of a country, it is simply impossible. The Black Death went around Poland. That is odd.

distribution of IQ and time preference
->
predatory response
or
shepherdly response

An earlier link I provided has a credible hypothesis as to why some plague waves did not hit Poland. These hypotheses are in line with the hypothesis as to the main ways that the plague bacterium entered and spread in Europe in different eras.

“It originated in China.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/206309.php

At the time, no one knew what caused it.

https://flutrackers.com/forum/forum/welcome-to-the-scientific-library/pandemics-in-literature/21952-the-bubonic-plague-and-the-impact-on-venice:

“By 1334, the plague had destroyed two thirds of China’s population and successive waves of the plague after 1348 took the lives of roughly one third of Southern Europeans.”
it is possible that Poland was relatively spared from the plague because it was not a trading nation . . .
This view is mentioned at the following link, but there are other reasons, such as an effective quarantine:
https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/16699/why-was-poland-spared-from-the-black-death”

These are the links you have provided. The first explains that one strain of the plague came from Crimea to Europe and originated in China. The route of this strain is well-known. It is the other strain that started in Holland that creates the doubts.

The second one tries to explain that nobody knew what causes plague. While this was true as as as Christianity is concerned, you have to remember the plagues of Moses against Egypt and the plague that killed Assyrians who had a siege around Jerusalem and the disease attacked king Hezekiah. It is very possible that those people knew of plague. The Turks knew very well as they threw the bodies of people who died in plague over the walls of the Italian city in Crimea. Those people knew that the disease is highly infective and can be used as a tool.

About the Black Death omitting Poland, I can only say that it circulated Poland and attacked Russia and Baltic countries, and I do not see any merit in efforts of explaining that Poland, at that time a major power, did not have trade routes, or that quarantine was effective in protecting this country and could not protect any other country. Quarantine did protect two cities in Italy and natural barriers did protect mountains of Spain, but Poland could not be protected in such ways. That is my opinion, not possible. Any time I travel in Poland I think: gimme 2000 tanks and I can run over the whole country. It does not have natural protections, unlike some other countries.

OF COURSE, Yankee-Judean menacing and threat of Yankee imperialism on behalf of negroes were probably the primary factors in the end of White rule in Rhodesia and South Africa, too.

Yeah if the South hadn’t worn that dress, the North wouldn’t have been inflamed to rape her. We all know the Yankee excuse.

“If you hadn’t filled that zoo with animals or that prison with criminals, there would have been no disaster for us to unleash.”

Great story bro, thx. Great protips for preventing Yankee-caused disasters. Don’t have black slaves, and Yankees won’t invade and set them all free to be America’s greatest, self-perpetuating disaster. Don’t be Conservative, and Yankees won’t have to force shitty leftist laws down your throat. Etc.

It will be wonderful watching Yankee hegemony crumble. I don’t know if I’ll live to see it, but someone will.

The problem with using White labor in the South is that White men died of tropical diseases. If the South had relied on imported White labor, there would have been no South. So this whole argument you’re using is Yankee Monday-morning QB retcon bullshit.

It’s interesting to see how logic works in your world; “big things never attack little things.”

You provided a link to a recent paper on plague strains. You must know of several earlier papers, which include the two strains of the Black Death. What your link makes very clear is that there is no endemic Norway plague. The strain that appeared in Holland during the Black death did most probably not come from Norway.

We may have different explanations for why the Black Death omitted Poland, but the main problem is why the epidemia was carried by two different strains of plague at the same time. That is unlikely. About Poland, still it is a strange coincidence, like protection by God after admitting God’s people there. (No suggestions, I do believe in miracles)

WTF I love aristos now.

https://russia-insider.com/en/politics/its-time-drop-jew-taboo/ri22186

P.S., the altright has forced many, if not most, (((Big Media))) sites to withdraw their phony “free speech” comment features, so they’re a lot rarer now, but sites like Breitbart routinely get 15, 20 thousand comments on articles. Mostly useless comments, but….

Yankee-caused disasters

Don’t look at most of us Yankees, the majority of us did not arrive in the US until after the Civil War except for WASPS in New Hampshire.

Tropical diseases

You know, there’s something third world about the South. Voodoo, hurricanes, Latin dictators running Miami.

Leftist laws

Agree with you. Integrated schools are bad.

Britain could not afford to keep Rhodesia.

The Jews live elbow-to-anus with Irish-Catholics and Italians and Arabs in NYC and have not done them in yet.

that’s preposterous

Rhodesia was the ‘breadbasket of Africa’

the only reason they went suicidal was due to massive pressure from (especially) Perfidious, pedophile Albion, and the length and breath of the zio-western world.

Just like S. Africa. Because Bruce Springsteen and Sting refused to play concerts there.

Exactly like all the (((forces))) demanding the West open their gates to unlimited and transformational immigration from hostile populations intended to wipe out Europe and Western civilization for all time. Just as (((they))) wiped out Rhodisia and are doing to S. Africa, and Sweden and France and England and N. America and on and on….

Duh.

Did the British quit India because of (They) too? How about Singapore?

Was this in the hopes that Chinese or Indians would kill the Brits?

“Exactly like all the (((forces))) demanding the West open their gates to unlimited and transformational immigration ”

It sounds as though you are equating contemporary immigration with the forced transport of black Africans to North America and the Caribbean.

The Jewish State’s gift for London: https://www.rt.com/uk/434021-white-helmets-granted-asylum/
“Some 98 White Helmets members were rescued by the Israel Defense Forces on Saturday night, as part of an evacuation mission that saw a total of 422 people collected from Syria and transferred across Northern Israel and into Jordan…
The UK is prepared to offer asylum to up to 500 White Helmets members or relatives of the group, officially known as the Syria Civil Defence. …
The UK new Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt who has heaped praise on the organization – which is funded heavily by the UK government – claiming Saturday night’s evacuation carried out by Israel was “fantastic news” as the White Helmets were the “bravest of the brave.”
– From the comment section: “The ‘bravest of the brave’ have to be ‘rescued’ from their own people, who they ‘selflessly’ were helping while collecting millions of dollars from the west and faking attacks by the Syrian government.”
– An honest voice by Craig Murray: “They may be jihadists but they are our jihadists. Fascinating that the ‘White Helmets’ are being brought straight to the UK with families when the Afghan and Iraqi military interpreters were not. The British government does not do this from humanity or obligation.”
– The UK government should resettle White Helmets next to the homes of the Friends of Israel and their best friend Jeremy Hunt.
Mark Regev, Israel’s ambassador to Britain, tweeted: “Mazal tov to Jeremy Hunt on his appointment as Foreign Secretary. Looking forward to further strengthening the Israel-UK partnership.” Guess, the enthusiastic supporter of “our jihadists,” Mr. Hunt, was appointed to his post of UK Foreign Secretary by the Friends of Israel in the UK.

Svig, you’re a National Treasure; I’ve said it before.

This point you made all those years ago opened my eyes:

Your questions are amusing; why relocate people you intend to murder? Why take them off the trains alive at all? Why not simply kill them on the train? Then you have no need for camps at all. That’s an enormous cost savings right there. Why relocate people you intend to mass murd

Exactly. If you intend to murder them and you don’t want the local populace to know, the EASY way to do it is to lock them in cattle cars, drive out to the hinterlands somewhere, unhook the cars containing them, go away. The *thirst* will kill them with a whole lot less effort than building camps with fake shower rooms delivering cyanide gas administered by tablets dropped down chutes into the room.
Why would anyone, sadist or not, go to all the *bother* of building all that infrastructure to kill people when thirst will do it a whole lot easier?

The Einsatzgruppen on the Eastern Front were simply anti-partisan units operating over a vast expanse of territory and which never amounted to more than a few thousand members.

Nobody doubts that some Jews were executed by them- either as partisan criminals (partisan activity was illegal under the articles of war), communist party commissars, or in hostage reprisal shootings for the same partisan activity, which in many cases involved horrible atrocities to German troops, including mutilating their bodies. Such shootings were not expressly illegal at the time.

The Shoah business continues to exaggerate the number of victims of the Einsatzgruppen by several orders of magnitude. The “women and children” allegedly shot were in all likelihood not women with babes in arms or babies or toddlers, but women and adolescents who were often frequently involved in partisan activity.

The most ridiculous aspect of this farce is the claim that the Germans sent an SS led crews to go back to the killing sites, dig up the graves and destroy the evidence by mass outdoor cremations. The idea of a work crew moving around an enormous land mass conducting mass excavation and cremation operations, dodging partisan attacks, etc. is ludicrous. If the Holohoax industry’s figures are to be believed, we are talking about the exhumation and cremation of 100 times the victims buried at Katyn. Simply ridiculous.

The only mass traces of human remains throughout this vast are – commensurate with hundreds of thousands killed- are the military cemeteries and the mass graves of the victims of the NKVD.

in part

because England aligned itself with the forces of the Fiend, and dashed their empire on the rocks of hatred and envy for Germany.

Had the Brits aligned with Germany, and helped Hitler to destroy the Bolshevik Fiend, then today Muslims wouldn’t be gang raping British school girls right and left. Duh.

It isn’t a matter of ‘killing the Brits’ per se.

It’s a matter of invading and colonizing and imposing yourselves upon them, which is what the Indians and Pakistanis and Jamaicans and everyone else is doing.

And why not? When your will to persevere has been crushed by generations of zio-liberal, soul-sewage pumped out by the (((media))) into the British society, and especially the impressionable children.

I don’t blame the invaders for coming and taking over England, (and Sweden and France and California, etc…) Rather I blame the venal and rotten British (and Swedish and French, et al) aristocracy. Especially the British, because it was their bellicose treachery that doomed Western civilization in the first place, by their sniveling fealty to all things Rothschild.

how so?

The forced transfers were intended to enrich a wealthy class of aristocrat scum at the direct expense of the people being transferred.

The unlimited immigration is intended to enrich the same class of wealthy scum at the direct expense of the people being replaced. They just decided that it’s more lucrative to use African and Indian cheap labor replacing the less docile Brits of England. And, it dovetails with the Jewish supremacist’s (and some commenters at Unz) desire to genocide white Westerners off the planet.

Yeah but I never get tired of hearing it. 

I kid, but, thanks for the kind word.

And yeah, for all I know, The Narrative is legit. I’m not an historian. I just know it really stinks. A lot.

I’m not blaming Yankees today, I’d’ve thought that was obvious. No one alive today is to blame.

But 1) it was Yankees’ fault back then, and 2) it is Yankees today who are completely full of shit and unwilling to acknowledge reality. They constantly point the finger at the South, like Southerners or the Confederacy waged or “forced” the War of Northern Aggression (how the fuck doing anything short of invasion or large-scale physical aggression or blockade or something similar forces someone else to wage an aggressive war is beyond me; NO, secession doesn’t FORCE aggressive war, NO, slavery + secession doesn’t FORCE aggressive war). And that’s fine coming from your typical shitlib or cuckservative Yankee but I’m not going to listen to it from “woke” or racially-aware Yankees who should know better.

P.S., the Florida panhandle is the South, the rest is Latin America or Florida or whatever, not the South.

Good point. It’s a coordinated attack against the white race on all fronts. It doesn’t matter if it’s a former colony or ancient homeland.

Thankfully, we’re waking up and the Tribe is facing the ride of a lifetime.

Slate and Salon: anodyne content, longer web presence. Unz has surpassed stats for antiwar.com and is gaining on TAC.

And however “unsophisiticated” you imagine the DDoS attacks to be, they effectively block a significant amount of traffic for extended periods of time, a phenomenon which would 1) explain lack of access to Ron’s article and 2) demonstrate that the usual suspects don’t find Ron’s article as unimportant as you would have us believe it is.

Everyone follows your comments Ron so let me take advantage of that to see who might find proof online that Tina Green (Christina indeed) is Jewish. The fact that her husband, with the name [Sir] Philip Nigel Ross Green, is as obviously Jewish as Harry Dexter White doesn’t count, and the fact that their son had a bar mitzvah only adds a question re conversion (not likely one valid in Israel where the Greens show no sign of settling, or even being buried near Robert Maxwell). While one can only commend the Greens splendid example in combating the fiscal fiend could they not have taught Bernie Madoff how to settle withthe most aggrieved losers and stay out of jail?

There is NOT ONE DOCUMENT outlining any extermination plan for jews or others. In fact, prominent Zionists collaborated with the German government and formulated plans at the highest level of the German government for the “transfer” of jews to what was then known as Palestine. Absolutely nothing about extermination.

Official International Red Cross figures for all camp “deaths” total around 731,000–NOT “6 million”. In fact, population totals pre-WW2 and post-WW2 show an INCREASE in the jewish population in post-WW2 Europe immediately after the cessation of the war…

Seriously, who is (probably) doing it, and with what backing? I set aside the fact that Ron’s genius could easily devise an AI self-educating bot to give UR the caché of DDoS [?] attacks though I trust thatvhis faithful pack of volunteer conspiracists will follow up on that.

Why seriously? Because it raises in yet another way the dilemma faced by Israel’s and, more broadly, the Jewish community’s defenders that the organised protest or counterattack itself does long term harm to Jews and Israel.

I’m ambivalent about all this genociding of whites business. My wife and I and our children are so white that we wonder how we can get strong enough sun creams. But I wouldn’t want our genes to be confined to mixing with those of 95 per cent of whites – even whites before the great Dysgenic Slide started. Can I be forgiven on UR for encouraging my issue to mate with high IQ healthy kind Asians and even Jews?

I’m ambivalent about all this genociding of whites business. My wife and I and our children are so white that we wonder how we can get strong enough sun creams…

Gosh, we must be some kind of karmic twins. Me, my wife, (her boyfriends), and our kids (and their Xirfriends) are also 120% super-white but we can’t be bothered about this white genocide business (lol). Let’s swap sun cream tips instead (lol).

He equates the effect to be the same. I’d say that US blacks have a worse predisposition towards society than Jamaican or Nigerian blacks in the UK, who immigrated out of their own free will.

If you’re daughter married some nominally-white Jew I’m willing to bet she’d be better-off than marry Cletus Billy Ray’s son who is a whigger with an Oxy habit. He might even have a decent job.

And at any rate, most interracial relationships are-as another poster pointed out-the end result of white prole Protestant kids (Since most Irish or Italian kids will attend Catholic schools) in “integrated prole schools” (As one poster put it) and involve and out-of-wedlock black male and a poor white girl.

I think most whites would be hard-pressed to really identify a Jew. Most of them look a bit like Henry Winkler but its not consistent.

You seem, like Wally, to be obsessed with the 6 million figure. I remember getting reproved in the 70s for saying that I had read that the figure might be more like 4 million but it is now commonplace in the MSM to say 4.5 to 6 million. So, no need to obsess. The website of the Yad Vashem data base of Shoa names has about 4.5 million listed though claiming they are part of 6 million. Of course Hitler would have happily shipped Germany’s Jews to somewhere out of Europe in return for a lot of money in 1933-34. Of course some Zionists played up anti Semitism and sought to take advantage of it. But equally, human beings have shown themselves repeatedly capable of genocide and, given the stab-in-the-back version of 1918, Nazi racial theory and the Jewish-Bolshevik-Communist ogre based on some truth, what’s the problem with believing that some senior Nazis planned a final solution by extermination and that plenty of willing helpers followed orders (since they couldn’t play round lynching blacks as KKK members in the Confederate states)? They were all shrewd enough to keep it from being shouted from the roof tops and recorded with incriminating signatures.

Dammit. Editing didn’t work twice. For “deprived” read “reproved”. OK fourth time lucky.

To the extent these are not true, perhaps people received the impression in good faith due to the Jewish practice of cutting babies’ foreskins and sucking off the blood?

Another theory is that the blood libel stories are more metaphorical than literal.