Komentari na prvi clanak! #1160-#1220....

 

 

  1. @Talha
     

    Thank you, Talha.

    Shiraz and Isfehan compete for the most liberal cities; Mashad & Qom — definitely conservative.

    To enter the precincts of the Shrine in Mashad, western women must wear a chador — that’s the garment made of about 2 acres of cloth, wrapped from head to ankle (in Iranian parlance, hijab covers just head and neck; frequently, a scarf is substituted). Chador are borrowed from a kiosk at the entrance gate, where Iranian women assist in the wrapping.
    Don’t know if Mashad has a Comedy Central, but watching western women attempt to navigate in a chador is fine entertainment. otoh, an Iranian woman worth her prayer beads can arrange her chador, ride a motorcycle through Tehran traffic with child on the handlebars and groceries in the back.

    I landed in Tehran airport in middle of the night. An Iranian basketball team had won some major contest and arrived at about the same time; a small crowd of Iranians bearing flowers was there to greet them. The women wore black chadors over drop-dead gorgeous clothing, high heels THAT high, exquisite make up and hair artfully arranged to test the limits of the modesty police. A sight I will not soon forget.

     
  2. Rurik says:
    @Heros
     

    Thank you for your thoughtful reply Heros,

    The percentages are no doubt disappointing, but I still honor those Jews who fought loyally for Germany, just as I would honor those today, who would repudiate what’s being done in Palestine, andreject the wholesale destruction of Western civilization, which does seem to be some kind of (psychotic) imperative for all Jewish supremacists- that do tend to mark the majority of Jews, but certainly not all of them.

    Also, we must remind ourselves that the Jewish supremacists would get nowhere fast were it not for the depraved enthusiasm of the armies of SJW and treasonous scum in our own ranks.

    This guy seems to personify both of those degeneracies

    Jewish supremacists

    it works for me.

    In fact I find it the perfect descriptive term, because it delineates the Jews who have no desire to harm us or the Palestinians

    http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2016/6/24/brexit-and-jewish-oligarchy

    vs. from those that do – the Jewish supremacists.

    But alas, as you mention, the former are far, far too few. Whereas the latter seem to be the rule.

    I wonder, other than men like Gilad Atzmon, how many other Jews are there that support both the rights of the Palestinians, and the rights of Brits to persevere, as Brits?

    Because the Jews I can think of, either support the plight of the Pals, or the plight of the Brits (and Germans and Swedes and French)- who’re very rapidly watching as their nations and futures are sent spiraling into the abyss of eternal strife, hatred, and ultimately of course; genocide.

    Not too many Jews I can think of support Trump’s immigrations reforms, and support the Palestinians.

    Most people are sheep-like. They simply want to pursue their best options in life while avoiding the landmines and obstacles that are out there. But I’m sure you’ve done a lot of good by planting a lot of seeds. Those seeds will eventually germinate, if the soil is fertile enough. And as more and more people seek out information like who owns and controls fake news media like (((CNN))), their eyes will slowly open, and one more warrior for truth and hope will stumble into the light.

    Cheers

    • Replies: @anonymous
     
    @jilles dykstra
     
  3. @Robjil
     

    Thanks just the same, Robjii, but I reject that form of argument that uses Nazism as the all-purpose comparative standing for “that which is the ultimate evil.”

    Nazism — actually, National Socialism — as well as Mussolini’s Fascism, should be defined, studied and understood on their own terms.

    Similarly, so should Bolshevism, zionism, and holocaustism.

    Those five phenomena — National Socialism, Fascism, Bolshevism, zionism, holocaustism — are distinct from one another, and some are radically different from each other. As I understand it, NS is radically different from zionism, which, in turn, is more appropriately compared to Bolshevism.

    • Replies: @ChuckOrloski
     
    @L.K
     
    @jacques sheete
     
  4. ANONYMOUS[107] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art
     

    . . . acknowledging the while that Jews dominate the psychology – psychiatry industry.

     
  5. Rurik says:
    @SolontoCroesus
     

    Absolutely get your popcorn, S2C!

    The Germans are and have been brow-beaten and savaged with generations of hate propaganda, reducing them to self-loathing lemmings. And they always were a lock-step sort. You should see the way Germans looked at me when I jaywalked in their cities. They were aghast, and I was astounded that people would stand there like drones for three minutes when there obviously wasn’t a car or train or anything coming from any direction.

    But since they didn’t have permission, not only would they stand there, they’d glower at anyone who didn’t- with outraged looks for the temerity to think for themselves. And do, accordingly.

    (just an observation)

    The British are too gay. The Swedes are too nice. The French, are – well.. the French.

    But when they tell Americans, (and I DO NOT mean Canadians) that we’re verboten to talk about something, well then I suspect that they’ve not really glimmered the true nature of the ‘scrappy, ‘ruggedly individualistic’, American.

    I remember how the feds were being treated at Ruby Ridge. The locals were getting ready to barbeque them. They were forced to make a hasty retreat.

    or consider the Bundy affair. These guys were getting ready to throw down against the Fiend

    http://www.trbimg.com/img-53bf68db/turbine/la-na-nn-bundy-ranch-report-20140711


    It may seem like too little, too late, but I know a lot of guys who’re telling me they’re more than ready for the day the Fiend comes for their guns. Some of them act like they can’t wait.

    Tell Americans that we’re not allowed to talk about something, and I bet there’s going to be a blowback, just like Trump’s (not unlikely, but literally unbelievable!) ascent to the White House, was a blowback by scrappy Americana against the arrogance and depravity of the Fiend.

    • Replies: @Them Guys
     
  6. Rurik says:

    no offense Geo (and others ; )

    Obviously I wasn’t referring to you, and I suspect you must know of what I’m talking. The Canadians I know would rather die than be ‘offensive’ in any way.

    • Agree: geokat62
  7. @Ace
     

    Tax cuts and deregulation are usually not a good idea, but union breaking is particularly harmful to the interests of the masses. Unions are a democratic institution that enables workers to bargain for better wages, healthcare, civilized working conditions, and human rights. When unions were crushed during the 80s and 90s, workers were put at the mercy of oligarchs and financiers.

    The problem with Americans is that they often willingly accept propaganda about how “union bosses” keep them poor. The “right to work” movement dangles the possibility of higher-wages for “high performers,” but most workers don’t realize that they’ll never make it into that elite group. So they end up working harder with reduced benefits, healthcare, working conditions, and salary.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
     
  8. @utu
     

    Are you that loony? I have said that Mongols had catapulted corpses into besieged cities & that was the only way to try to provoke the plague. Poisoning the wells has absolutely nothing to do with it.

    The problem with most antisemites is not their world-view; it is the level of their stupidity & irrationality that are of epic proportions. If one could just condense idiocy, blind superstitions & absurdist lunacy and sell them like soda, antisemites would, along with feminists & SJWs, be the richest recognized group in the world.

    • Replies: @Art
     
    @jacques sheete
     
    @Anon
     
    @annamaria
     
    @utu
     
  9. anonymous[107] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rurik
     

    dude looks like he had a vibrator in his pants & Page was, um, sexting er texting him.

     
  10. Rich says:
    @Hippopotamusdrome
     

    That story about Colonial Americans giving smallpox blankets to Injuns is a fable. Never happened. It was in a scene from a movie in the early 30′s where a Hessian colonel does it. It never actually happened.

    • Replies: @Hippopotamusdrome
     
  11. annamaria says:
    @jacques sheete
     

    “Armand” had extremely profitable “relationships” with Russian art: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1377527/How-the-Bolsheviks-sold-Russias-treasures.html
    “The Bolsheviks first looted the churches. Then they sold the imperial family’s crowns, tiaras, necklaces and Faberge eggs. Finally, they helped themselves to Old Masters hanging in the Hermitage museum. …
    The world’s oldest edition of the New Testament, the contents of whole palaces, icons and Impressionist masterpieces were also part of the booty the Bolsheviks put on the international art market in the 1920s and 1930s. …
    Among the curios snapped up by Western collectors were the Russian Empress’s wedding crown, paintings by Rembrandt, Botticelli, Cranach the Elder, Cezanne, Van Gogh, Poussin and Degas and icons from the 15th and 16th centuries. …
    Russia’s culture minister, Mikhail Shvydkoi, said: “Sometimes I think that the Bolsheviks were consciously taking revenge on the imperial family. These sales in the 1930s were economically senseless.”
    Armand Hammer, the Soviet Union’s favourite capitalist, was also used as a middleman, selling antiques on behalf of Moscow in American department stores. He remained popular with the Soviet regime, and was given a Malevich painting in the 1970s. He sold it for one million German marks soon afterwards.”

    The deciders of Soviet Russia: https://archive.org/details/SolzhenitsynYouMustUnderstandTheLeadingBolsheviksWhoTookOverRussiaWereNotRussians
    “You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.” It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history.
    It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.” Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism

    • Agree: Rurikjacques sheeteThem Guys
    • Replies: @jacques sheete
     
    @Anon
     
    @Skeptikal
     
    @NYCTexan
     
  12. @SolontoCroesus
     

    SolontoCroesus wrote: “Those five phenomena — National Socialism, Fascism, Bolshevism, zionism, holocaustism — are distinct from one another, and some are radically different from each other.”

    Hi S2C,

    I concur with your intelligent view, “NS is radically different from zionism,” and I believe Bolshevism had sprung from the rotten root of Zionism.

    Of course, now the fruit of the rotten root is become “Globalism,” which I believe has the malignant potential to become The “ultimate evil.”

    Globalism is controlled by what tricky “America First” PreZident Trump, & during a mistaken moment of public candor, might have called “Bad hombres.”

     
  13. Art says:
    @Bardon Kaldian
     

    The problem with most antisemites is not their world-view; it is the level of their stupidity & irrationality that are of epic proportions.

    Oh my’ — our knuckle dragging Jew loving howler monkey – Bardon — is screeching again. Look – he is so excited – he is jumping up and down scratching his armpits – squealing “Jew victim Jew victim” – he is so cute.

    Poor little guy – the more noise he makes – the less people listen to him.

    He will never be anything more than a monkey mouth for the Jews. He does not have the intellectual capacity to think anything more than tribe – thoughts of peace cannot penetrate his monkey brain.

    Sad – so sad for him.

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Maintain Western Christianity — Art

    p.s. Loves Jews – hates America – what a loser.

     
  14. L.K says:
    @SolontoCroesus
     

    SolontoCroesus says:Next New Comment
    July 21, 2018 at 7:20 pm GMT • 100 Words
    @Robjil

    Great post, Solonto.

     
  15. L.K says:

    A snippet from the book “Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years” by
    Israeli Professor Israel Shahak, mentioned in the excellent Unz article, and which helps us understand the thought processes of many Jews…

     
  16. Sean says:
    @utu
     

    Yes Western Jews might do bad things even if we get them out of the trap they’re in, but they will certainly do much worse things if we don’t get them out of it.

    During the twenties, David Ben Gurion wrote a book saying the Palestinians would convert to Judaism, apart from Jabotinsk, the early Zionist movement was completely out of touch with the reality of what they were doing , but the scales have dropped from their eyes judging by the law they just passed. Israel not willing to pay the price for being a light unto nations, they are an ordinary nation state that has absolutely no intention of handing over a chunk of territory around its capital.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
     
    @Anonymous
     
  17. @annamaria
     

    Speaking of frauds, the NYT (of all places) actually admitted to his scams and deviant behavior in a rather long article about him. One example of many…

     
  18. @SolontoCroesus
     

    Count me in. It’s another form of mental laziness and a sign of gross ignorance and any author who engages in it is loathed by me as an utter ignoramus.

    • Replies: @bjondo
     
  19. @Bardon Kaldian
     

    Instead, we have Zionists…

     
  20. @JohnnyWalker123
     

    I agree that unions can be a good thing, at least up to the time they get subverted and taken over by the mafia, which seems to have happened fairly regularly. Same thing happens with government and religious and other institutions as well, unfortunately.

    Since most taxes eventually wind up funding various scams, tax cuts are a great idea.

     
  21. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @annamaria
     

    One thing I forgot in my post about Armand Hammer is that the Soviet government gave him the hallmark stamps for Faberge eggs. He recruited some jewelers and set up a shop in France and they turned out counterfeit Faberge eggs for decades.

    It was his ships that arrived at the Port of Barcelona at the end of what ignorant liberals call the * Spanish Civil War. As they retreated the Russians stole massive amounts of machinery, technology and equipment which was shipped the Russia via the Med and the Black Sea on Hammer’s ships.

    *. Spanish civil war was an attempt by the Soviet Union to conquer Spain in the 1930s. Despite the entire world’s press siding with the Soviet and American Jews, the greatest man of the 20th century, General Franco defeated the Soviets and saved Spain.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
     
    @jacques sheete
     
  22. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Bardon Kaldian
     

    You are right that poisoning wells wouldn’t spread plague. Cholera and other intestinal diseases can be spread by simply dumping human and animal manure in wells.

    As for anti semites are stupid ignorant morons. It’s just not true. Anti semities
    are people who can see through propaganda and find the truth.

    There’s an old French saying, “ Don’t listen to what he says, watch what he does.”

    I stopped reading and listening to the Jewish
    “ We’re just do gooders who just want to save blacks Hispanics illegal immigrants criminals and LGBQTU from evil KKK White Christians “

    around my 23rd birthday just by observing what American Jews were doing in just one small city.

     
  23. bjondo says:
    @jacques sheete
     

    My take.

    Nazism is Judaism.
    Hitler is Jew.

    This lunatic, fevered description of of the ultimate evil is projection.

    Projection, diversion by Jew.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
     
  24. annamaria says:
    @Bardon Kaldian
     

    “..it is the level of their stupidity & irrationality…”
    — Could you provide your grade for the ‘level of stupidity & irrationality ‘ exhibited by certain theocratic “democracy?” https://countercurrents.org/2018/07/05/israel-is-arming-neo-nazis-in-ukraine/
    “Israel is arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine: Azov Battalion online propaganda shows Israeli-licensed Tavor rifles in the fascist group’s hands …
    … the Israeli defense ministry’s arms export agency says they are “careful to grant licenses” to arms exporters “in full coordination with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other government entities.”

    • Replies: @Art
     
    @Wally
     
  25. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Mulegino1
     

    Another old French saying, Society is like stew. The scum rises to the top. The dregs fall to the bottom. In the middle are the good meat and vegetables.

     
  26. “If we understand the mechanisms and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”
    When Austrian-American Edward Bernays transcribed those thoughts into his 1928 book, Propaganda, he was most likely reflecting on the grandest hoax in history – perpetrated on humankind by his Zionist forefathers roughly a century earlier – that “Jews” were (and still are) chosen by “God” to be an exceptional, superior, separate, people and nation.
    Ever since, the masses (including “Jews”) – minds controlled and regimented according to the Zionist will, unconsciously and without a second thought – believe that “Jews” are a people, a race, and a nation, and not just adherents of the Jewish religion.
    So now, after roughly 170 years of programming, humanity credulously accepts the con. What is most disconcerting for me is to see critical, independent thinkers; revisionist historians (including Israeli); authors; academics, and politicians, wrestling with how to refer to non-adherents of the Jewish religion. Most simply continue to use the word Jew, and thus the hoax continues, unquestioned.
    But what else can any of us do, or say? How else to describe a non-practicing Jew?
    Well, how do we describe non-religious Christians, Buddhists, Muslims, Sikhs, etc? We don’t, as no such creatures exist. We refer to people by their nationality: American, Canadian, German, Russian, etc, or by their race (within the human race): white/Caucasian, Mongoloid/Asian, Negroid/Black and Australoid, and most, or many, of us don’t give a damn about their beliefs.
    As there is no way any of us is going to change the minds of the regimented masses and their Orwellian group-think – I’m suggesting a solution: when writing, we enclose with quotations the word “Jew” and its derivatives “Jews,” “Jewish,” “Jewishness,”, and preface any book, article, remark, or comment with something like:
    “I enclose the word Jew in quotations to indicate that I’m referring – not to an adherent of the Jewish religion – but to a person who believes – wittingly or not – that (s)he belongs to the God-chosen, exceptional, superior, separate race, people, and nation.” 
    When speaking, we try to avoid using the word(s) at all, unless referring to followers of the Jewish religion. If necessary, we preface our remarks with something similar to the above.
    Zionists will continue to disseminate the farcical lie and use it as their ancient and malicious Pharisaic-Talmudic WMD to instigate global mayhem; to destroy anyone who dares question their God-given right to world hegemony; to effect regime change worldwide (including the U.S.); to slaughter and exterminate Palestinians and Arabs; confiscate their land, and eventually annex the entire Middle East as their God-given “Jewish State.”
    They will continue to distract us with such fabricated accessories as “Orthodox,” “Sephardic,” “Ashkenazi,” “Khazarian,” “Kabbalistic,” etc, as if there were not only a “Jewish” race but different tribes or sects within it. Whether Orthodox or Paradox, Sephardic or Sefarcical; Ashkenazi or Ashkenutty; Khazarian or Caesarian, Kabbalistic or cannibalistic, they do not exist.
    The only evidence the Zionist con-artists ever provided has been an anthology of ancient oral anecdotes – transcribed centuries after they allegedly happened – into what is commonly referred to as the Old Testament or Tanakh, or Mikra.
    I appreciate that what I’m saying is simplistic, but I continue to try to understand how and why the con happened and how humanity swallowed the hook, line, and sinker.

     
  27. @bjondo
     

    Yup, it’s all a fraud. Gross exaggeration and worse.

    Their modus operandi includes extensive use of this.:

    • Replies: @utu
     
  28. @Anon
     

    Where did you find such interesting info? (I don’t doubt any of it.)

    I wonder if he was involved with the massive transfer of US wealth to the USSR via Lend Lease…

    • Replies: @Anon
     
  29. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker
     

    Cajuns live about 200 miles from New Orleans.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
     
  30. @Anon
     

    I wonder if he was involved with the massive theft of US wealth during and after WW2, including atomic technology and material and supplies to print US currency.

     
  31. @Sean
     

    That Wikipedia link to the article on Ehud Barak is doubly interesting. It is often said on UR threads that Wikipedia is in effect censored by Jewish interests. Yet the words you quote appear there, which suggests that the censorship us done with a light touch. Perhaps realism prevails about what is useful editing and censorship.

    There are a couple of little linguistic tells that suggest that the first language of the writer(s) of the Ehud Barak Wikipedia article is not English. No surprise if it was an Israeli who wrote it. That probability also serves as a reminder that Israeli Jews can be a lot more straightforward about human rights and other Israel focused concerns than diaspora supporters (often) are.

    • Replies: @Sean
     
  32. Here’s one example of how he used an American president against the interests of the USA.:

     
  33. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:
    @Art
     

    How about learning to and bothering to read before offering more of your brainfarts Art.

    It was about the lunatic’s suggestion that the British government would take much notice of the Lord Mayor of London, though what is said about the Rothschilds is about 150 years out of date to the extent that there is any truth in it at all. See what Thorfinnsson said earlier.

    • Replies: @Art
     
  34. Anon[436] • Disclaimer says:

    One of my regular Saturday tennis fours includes a Muslim and a Jew. The former keeps Ramadan as I know from his weeks of weakness and I trust his line calls but the Jew not only plays on Saturday but eats pork. Can I trust his?

     
  35. @Anonymous Jew
     

    ANONYMOUS JEW

    I’m sorry but growing up around “Beastie Boys” (Sort of Proto-whiggers because many Jews were from the hood) and assorted street Jews, I’m just disbelieving of their chosen status or uniform position as the US over-class.

    A good number were winos as well, who would always be shouted at by the local Rabbi when trying to bother him for money to buy booze-Jack Daniels was their drink of choice.

    Sorry, but not every Jew belongs to the over-class or is even terribly intellectual.

    Many are WEIRD but a good number are a rough lot without a two pennies to rub together. This could be on the New Jersey-Pittsburgh-Cleveland-Detroit-Chicago axis, where common or garden rust-belt Jews live, as oppose to Manhattan or Hollywood.

    As for the Khazar thing, there are obviously a few Jews like Rosanne Barr or Bob Dylan who have this Turkic mongol appearance but most Jews look like Henry Winkler are simply a Mediterranean genetic casserole of Levant, Greek and Roman ancestry and like Proval or Dan Hedeya they always play assistant mobster types.

    Polish Jews like Harvey Keitel who are blue-eyed Slav-looking are probably descended from local converts at the time the King of Poland invited the Jews who have negligible Levant genes.

     
  36. Art says:
    @annamaria
     

    annamaria,

    Doesn’t that make you feel good?

    The whole Israeli government has the same stamp of approval – it says “Talmud Determined”

    We know what that means “no justice.”

    Think Peace — Art

     
  37. @Ron Unz
     

    Just a thought – on which your thoughts would be especially valued…..

    In Australia where, historically, our small population used to follow first English or more broadly British fashions and then, in the 20th century, with sometimes 20 year lags, American ways, we never had the equivalent of the great Red State flyover country of small towns stocked with Bible bashing [choose insulting description to taste].

    The Catholic Church in Australia has long since lost battles against legal abortion and there is no serious Protestant vote on anything. And I don’t detect any Jewish animus against Christians. Even after the increase in the Orthodox Jewish numbers thanks to Hitler, and then the creation of Israel it is difficult to detect any great anti-Christian Jewish community feeling – though you could question whether I would notice and also note that Jews are proportionately fewer in Oz than in the US. So….

    My theory is that a great many Jews in America are people like me who simply have no sympathy with the religion or ideas of the Red State Protestants any more than with the now retreating Catholic hierarchs. Maybe there are not many big battles to be fought – though Roe v. Wade may need to be defended – but the divide (tinged with contempt) is mostly cultural in a broad sense with nothing much Judaic involved. Consistently with this speculative analysis I would accept that in parts of the US – at least in the East – there is a critical mass of Jews which tends to keep a cultural bubble sealed for many and allows trivial reinforcement like retelling of stories of grandpa’s being blackballed by the golf club.

    Am I on a discernible track?

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
     
    @iffen
     
  38. @Anon
     

    Aren’t most whites in Louisiana of French-Canadian descent?

    • Replies: @Anon
     
  39. Them Guys says:
    @Rurik
     

    Rurik: Note the obviously hand made/home made protest signs at Randy Weaver support protest. Now compare to EVERY lefty dem lib protest event. Be it BLM African negroes, or Radical feminists, or ANTIFA Bolsheviks…… Every such lefty group, Illegal Mexicans also, Have perfect same sized, same colors combos, exact same wooden stick signs attached to, etc etc always all the same.

    I consider this as solid 100% Proof that such lefty protests are all massivly funded by Soros, Hillary’s Foundation tax free org, and the like. They are all like professional Union workers walk out strike protests with Pre designed, Pre Made, Pre funded signs and even uniforms or identicle T-shirts with same slogans…..In other words it shows how Randy Weavers supporters were all Real, actual grass roots ground up and sincere as can be. Pro funded lefty mob protests consist of massive percentages of brainwashed, marxist trained followers that will Riot and Loot and destroy vehicles they don’t own, then end with burn down city protest is held in. They will riot etc at drop of a chicken bone.

    This fakery can be seen also when protests in other distant nations are shown on american msm news shows, and even though nobody in those nations speaks english, most every protest sign is written in Engliish!…it screams Pure Propaganda intended for american viewers in order to rally duped marxist trained/brainwashed usa peoples to join in and demand “justice” etc for folks in nations most usa fools can’t locate on a world map.

    Follow the crowd, be a lemming, allow peer pressures to captivate and rule their small minds, in a nut shell so to speak eh.

    I rather trust and have far smaller group like Randy Weavers supporters in My Fox Hole if it comes to that, than to even consider to allow any of those Plastic Pre Fab, Trained like a circus seal idiots seen on tv at most every lefty protest and every mexican illegals “marches”.

    You are also very correct on how Many guys are fed up and litterally chomping at bit to Lock & Load and do a real solid usa fix job. I cannot count how many where I live at in up north mich area. It be far eaiser to just count those who aint chompin at bit, and most around here, are already loaded and locked!

    Best advice one can give when newbees to truth and red pills ask “What can we/I do”?

    Tell them to, Buy More guns and way more Cases of Ammo! Can never have enough.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
     
    @RobinG
     
    @Rurik
     
  40. anarchyst says:
    @Them Guys
     

    Yes, look up “Crowds On Demand”. It is a real jewish-owned company that provides protesters for any event. You can bet that antifa and other left-wing protesters are mostly being paid by “Crowds On Demand” or other like companies that provide “bodies” for any event. The pay is around $15.00 per hour while their “handlers” are paid more. “Crowds On Demand” WAS used for most of the major protests and riots that have been orchestrated by the left for the past few years or so.

     
  41. @Rich
     

    Is this a case of anti-Japethetic blanket-libel?

    The idea was considered at one time.
    a letter to Colonel Henry Bouquet dated July 7, 1763

    • Replies: @Rich
     
    @jilles dykstra
     
  42. @Wizard of Oz
     

    Gallipoli sort of underscored the Irish immigrant Catholic underclass status in Australia up the First World War as played by an Irish-American Catholic-Gibson. There WAS a bit of contempt in early Australia for Irish Catholics at a time.

    As for Jews, they have less influence in Perth than Vietnamese or Greeks in Melbourne because not too many immigrated to Australia and there was never the confluence of geography (Jews congregated on the East Coast of the United States which was the center of finance and power) and ability (The film business and law put high verbal IQ’s to good use).

    Australia’s “Flyover” was always so barren and unproductive that only blacks lived there and unlike the United States where they are regarded as an urban problem, in Oz they are in the backwaters.

    I’m not going to all Marxist but while the Italians and Greeks of Melbourne produced a few nasty hoodlums and the Ecstasy-craze of the 90′s was sort of like Prohibition to Capone as far some of these Balkan and Italians went, it is really hard to muster up a Sopranos type level of organized crime in the suburbs of Melbourne.

    Vietnamese boat people were really a result of American ructions in Vietnam-unlike the US no third world country sends endless labor-and Mexicans gangs can hold their own against any pack of Russel Crowe skinheads. Even so, the Vietnamese had their own heroin czars and crime lords who were a headache and nightmare for Australia. But there is no physical border between Vietnam and Australian.

    There is a feeling in the Flyover that the people are the founding stock of the country and that later arrivals repossessed the country and economy. People in Adelaide do not resent people in Sydney to the extent that people in the US interior resent the East Coast.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
     
  43. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @jacques sheete
     

    There are a few biographies of Hamner that tell the truth. I found them in a university library. You’ll also find the information in non communist histories of the Spanish Civil War.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
     
  44. Anon[257] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jeff Stryker
     

    No. The Cajuns are of French Canadian descent. They are a minority of the people with French names.

     
  45. RobinG says:
    @Them Guys
     

    “I consider this as solid 100% Proof … ”

    Sad. Now I’ll have to bear this lack of discernment (or experience) in mind, if I read any of your comments. Anarchyst was already expendable.

    • Replies: @Talha
     
  46. Rich says:
    @Hippopotamusdrome
     

    The Germ Theory of spreading disease wasn’t accepted by science until the 19th century, though it’s possible this British official of yours intuited its veracity a couple centuries earlier, if this letter is real. After reading a little about the incident, there appears to be some doubt about whether this attempt was actually carried out. One historian writes that the blankets in question were actually given to friendly tribes as a gift because the official was unaware, like most scientists of the time, of the germ theory. I always have a hard time with anti-White history, because everything is twisted nowadays to make Whitey look bad, to the point of lying about history.

    • Replies: @utu
     
  47. Art says:
    @Anon
     

    “extent that there is any truth in it at all” — Oh dear’ – another false hoax about Jews – how do you Jews bare it so well?

    Really — I don’t believe you.

    What did the Rothschilds do during WWII? Why didn’t Hitler take them out? Hmm?

    Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

     
  48. utu says:
    @Bardon Kaldian
     

    There are good argument that Black Death was not a plague but it could have been anthrax or some form of Ebola virus.

    Why not plague

    Anthrax

    Ebola

    Note that Ashkenazi Jews from Poland and Lithuania have 25% resistance to HIV.

    • Replies: @RobinG
     
    @j2
     
  49. Talha says:
    @RobinG
     

    I agree here; professionally done material are not ipso facto proof of external support. At my time in UCLA, our Muslim community would come up with very professional looking anti-Zionist protest material (easily printed at Kinkos [before Fedex bought them out]). I know we weren’t receiving any funds from Soros types.

    Favorite memory was when we had protested an Israeli event that was hosting some event – I think it was a fundraiser, not sure. Anyhow, we were on our way back to our little Islamic book/clothing store we used to run in Culver City and we saw a bunch of cops coming down our road and shutting down traffic. Apparently Clinton’s motorcade had decided to use our street to pass through. My guess is he was on the way to the same event we had just gotten back from, but I’m not sure about that either. We ran in to get the signs and had an impromptu protest for about a minute as the cars passed. Now I didn’t see him, but one of the brothers said he saw Clinton looking right at us and upset. Ha – so worth it! Only wish I had gotten a glance!

    Some day I’ll tell you about the day my wife and I went to a protest right after getting married – literally the day of. But it wasn’t Zionist related so I’ll keep it for another day. Yeah, we were crazy like that – good times!

    Peace.

    • Replies: @Them Guys
     
    @Rurik
     
  50. utu says:
    @Rich
     

    There is no doubt that letters and other documents are authentic.

    • Replies: @Them Guys
     
  51. Anonymous[358] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sean
     

    During the twenties, David Ben Gurion wrote a book saying the Palestinians would convert to Judaism,

    He never wrote such a thing.

    • Replies: @Sean
     
  52. Karl says:
    @Tyrion 2
     

    223 Tyrion 2 > Karaites are a tiny sect of fundamentalists who believe in taking everything in the Torah absolutely literally and in the most simplistic way possible

    In your whole life, you have never even spoken face-to-face with one Karaite person

    • Agree: Tyrion 2
  53. @Jeff Stryker
     

    Aboriginals are not ‘blacks’.
    About being barren, they had a rich culture.
    Mudrooroo, ‘Aboriginal Mythology, An A-Z spanning the history of aboriginal mythology from the earliest legends to the present day’, London 1994
    Labumore: Elsie Roughsey, ‘An Aboriginal Mother Tells of the Old and the New´, Fitzroy, Victoria, 1984
    The last book, not flattering for the west, to make an understatement.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
     
  54. @Hippopotamusdrome
     

    Forgot in which book is described that is was done, giving blankets from USA hospitals where smallpox was treated, to Indians.

    • Replies: @Anon
     
  55. @Rurik
     

    Jews fought for Hitler?
    New for me.

    • Replies: @Rurik
     
  56. @Zeidner
     

    ” there is no monolithic Judaism ”
    Correct, but dissidents are called traitors, Finkelstein, Pappe, Hamburger, rabbi David Shasha, anything is done to prevent that they make themselves heard, such as Germany forbidding Finkelstein and Pappe to speak in Germany

     
  57. Anonymous[321] • Disclaimer says:
    @MQ
     

    Your paranoia makes you sound like PeterAUS. All that fake concern for our future wellbeing at the hands of ‘dark forces’ and a gentle suggestion that it’s better not to disturb (((them))) too much.

    What a load of bullshit!

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
     
  58. Seraphim says:
    @Bardon Kaldian
     

    The ‘bizarre’ source is… Jewish Encyclopedia
    sv SAVOY, by Joseph Jacobs, Isaac Broydé

    “Savoy was especially prominent in the tragedy of the Black Death in 1348. Chambéry, its capital, was alleged by the accusers of the Jews to have been the place where the poison for the wells, the supposed origin of the plague, was prepared by Rabbi Peyret and a rich Jew named Aboget. In consequence of this accusation Jews were massacred at Chambéry, Chillon, Chatel, Yenne, Saint-Genis, Aiguebelle, and Montmélian. In the last-mentioned town the Jews were imprisoned, and while they were awaiting judgment the populace invaded the prison and massacred them, with the exception of eleven persons who were later burned alive in an old barn filled with inflammable materials. A document relating to that persecution has preserved the names of the victims of Aiguebelle. These were: Beneyton, Saul, the Jewess Joyon, Lyonetus, Soninus, Vimandus, Bonnsuper, Samuel, Mouxa, Beneyton, Coen, Helist, Jacob and his son Bonionus, Parvus Samuel, Abraham, Benyon, Sansoninus, Samuel, and Magister Benedictus. However, the persecution was soon forgotten, and the Jews of Savoy resumed their occupations, which consisted chiefly in money-lending and trading in jewelry. Their success in the former is evidenced by the fact that the dukes themselves were very often their debtors”.

    Other sources quoted at:
    David Nirenberg “Communities of Violence: Persecution of Minorities in the Middle Ages”, Princeton University Press (1996)
    Carlo Ginzburg “Ecstasies: Deciphering the Witches’ Sabbath”. New York. 1991.

     
  59. Jewish Ritual Murder in England Before 1290

    Arnold S. Leese

    The first known case occurred in 1144; after that, cases cropped up from time to time until the Jews were expelled from the realm by Edward I. The most famous of these incidents was that of Little St. Hugh of Lincoln in 1255. I record these cases in chronological order; and I do not deny the possibility that some of them, in which details are lacking, were “trumped up” ones, where death may have been due to causes other than ritual murder and the Jews blamed for it; but the case of St. Hugh, particularly, was juridically decided, and the Close and Patent Rolls of the Realm record definitely cases at London, Winchester and Oxford. There seems no reason to doubt that many cases of ritual murder have been unsuspected and even undiscovered.

    1144, Norwich. A twelve year-old boy was crucified and his side pierced at the Jewish Passover. His body was found in a sack hidden in a tree. A converted Jew, called Theobald of Cambridge, confessed that the Jews took blood every year from a Christian child because they thought that only by so doing could they ever obtain their freedom and return to Palestine; and that it was their custom to draw lots to decide whence the blood was to be supplied; Theobald said that last year the lot fell to Narbonne, but in this year to Norwich. The boy was locally beatified and has ever since been known as St. William. The Sheriff, probably bribed, refused to bring the Jews to trial.

    In J. C. Cox’s Norfolk Churches, vol. II, p. 47, as also in the Victoria County History of Norfolk, 1906, vol.. II, is an illustration of an old painted rood-screen depicting the ritual murder of St. William; the screen itself is in Loddon Church, Norfolk, unless the power of Jewish money has had it removed. No-one denies this case as a historical event, but the Jews of course say it was not a ritual murder. The Jew, C. Roth, in his The Ritual Murder Libel and the Jew (1935) says: “Modern enquirers, after careful examination of the facts, have concluded that the child probably lost consciousness in consequence of a cataleptic fit, and was buried prematurely by his relatives.” How these modern enquirers arrived at a conclusion like that after all these years, Mr. Roth does not say; nor is it a compliment to the Church to suggest that its ministers would allow the boy’s death to be celebrated as the martyrdom of a saint without having satisfied themselves that wounds on the body confirmed the crucifixion and piercing of the side. And why the relatives should bury the boy in a sack and then dig it up and hang it in a tree would puzzle even a Jew to explain.

    John Foxe’s Acts and Monuments of the Church records this ritual murder, as did the Ballandists and other historians. The Prior, William Turbe, who afterwards became Bishop of Norwich, was the leading light in insisting that the crime was one of Jewish ritual murder; in the Dictionary of National Biography (edited by a Jew!) it is made clear that his career, quite apart from this ritual murder case, is that of a man of great strength of character and moral courage.

    1160, Gloucester. The body of a child named Harold was found in the river with the usual wounds of crucifixion. Sometimes wrongly dated 1168. (Recorded in Monumenta Germania Historica, vol. VI (Erfurt Annals); Polychronicon, R. Higdon; Chronicles, R. Grafton, p. 46.)

    1181, Bury St. Edmunds. A child called Robert was sacrificed at Passover. The child was buried in the church and its presence there was supposed to cause miracles. (Authority: Rohrbacher, from the Chronicle of Gervase of Canterbury.)

    1192, Winchester. A boy crucified. Mentioned in the Jewish Encyclopaedia as being a false charge. Details lacking.

    1232, Winchester. Boy crucified. Details lacking. (Mentioned in Hyamson’s History of the Jews in England; also in Annals of Winchester; and conclusively in the Close Roll 16, Henry III, m.8, 26.6.1232.)

    1235, Norwich. In this case, Jews stole a child and hid him with a view to crucifying him. Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates of date 1847, says of this case, “They [the Jews] circumcise and attempt to crucify a child at Norwich; the offenders are condemned in a fine of 20,000 marks.” (Further authority Huillard Breolles, Grande Chronique, III, 86; also Close Roll, 19 Henry III, m.23.)

    1244, London. A child’s body found unburied in the cemetery of St. Benedict, with ritual cuts. Buried with great pomp in St. Paul’s. (Authority: Social England, vol. I, p. 407, edited by H. D. Traill.)

    1255, Lincoln. A boy called Hugh was kidnapped by the Jews and crucified and tortured in hatred of Jesus Christ. The boy’s mother found the body in a well on the premises of a Jew called Jopin or Copinus. This Jew, promised by the judge his life if he confessed, did so, and 91 Jews were arrested; eventually 18 were hanged for the crime. King Henry III himself personally ordered the juridical investigation of the case five weeks after the discovery of the body, and refused to allow mercy to be shown to the Jew Copinus, who was executed.

    Hugh was locally beatified, and his tomb may still be seen in Lincoln Cathedral, but the Jewish Money Power has evidently been at work, for between 1910 and 1930 a notice was fixed above the shrine as follows: “The body of Hugh was given burial in the Cathedral and treated as that of a martyr. When the Minster was repaved, the skeleton of a small child was found beneath the present tombstone. There are many incidents in the story which tend to throw doubt upon it, and the existence of similar stories in England and elsewhere points to their origin in the fanatical hatred of the Jews of the Middle Ages and the common superstition, now wholly discredited, that ritual murder was a factor of Jewish Paschal Rites. Attempts were made as early as the 13th century by the Church to protect the Jews against the hatred of the populace and against this particular accusation.”

    At a visit to Lincoln of the Jewish Historical Society, in 1934, the Mayor, Mr. G. Deer, said to them: “That he [St. Hugh] was done to death by Jews for ritual purposes cannot be other than a libel based upon the prejudices and ignorance of an unenlightened age.” The Chancellor on the same occasion said: “It was quite obviously one of the very many cases of slander spread about the Jews from time to time. No doubt, the child died or fell down the well.”

    These people, Jews and Gentiles, bring no evidence whatever for their statement; it couldn’t have happened, they say. Why not?

    Was Henry III, weak in character as we know him to have been, ever charged with being an immoral man? Did the judges not examine the body, which was only four weeks dead? Is Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates (1847 edition) medieval and superstitious when it said of this case “They [the Jews] crucify a child at Lincoln, for which eighteen are hanged”? There are no ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’ here! Or does Copinus’s confession not tally with that of Theobald, quoted above in the first Norwich case? Copinus said, “For the death of this child, nearly all the Jews in England had come together and every town had sent deputies to assist in the sacrifice.”

    No-one questions the historical facts in this case; but Jews and Judaized Gentiles alike unite in denying the fact of ritual murder.

    Strack, in his The Jew and Human Sacrifice, written in defence of the Jews against the Blood Accusation, omits all mention of this famous case, which is the subject of the Prioress’s Tale in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales and is referred to in Marlowe’s Jew of Malta. Hyamson’s History of the Jews in England devotes the whole of Chapter IX to “Little St. Hugh of Lincoln,” showing the importance of the ritual murder issue in the Jewish mind today. (The following Close Rolls of the Realm refer to the case of St. Hugh: Henry III, 39, m.2, 7.10.1255; 39, m.2, 14.10.1255; 40, m.20, 24.11.1255; 40, m.13, 13.3.1256; 42, m.6, 19.6.1258. And the Patent Rolls, Henry III, 40, m.20, 26.11.1255; 40, m.19, 9.12.1255; 40, 27.3.1256; and 40, m.5, 20.8.1256.)

    1257, London. A child sacrificed. (Authority: Cluverius, Epitome Historiae p. 541.) Details lacking.

    1276, London. Boy crucified. (Authority: The Close Roll of the Realm, 4, Edward I, m.14, 3.3.1276.)

    1279, Northampton. A child crucified. Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates, 1847, says of this case: “They [the Jews] crucify a child at Northampton for which fifty are drawn at horses’ tails and hanged.” (Further authorities: Reiley, Memorials of London, p. 15; H. Desportes, Le Mystére du Sang.)

    1290, Oxford. The Patent Roll 18 Edward I, m.21, 21st June 1290, contains an order for the gaol delivery of a Jew, Isaac de Pulet, detained for the murder of a Christian boy at Oxford.

    Only one month after this, King Edward issued his decree expelling the Jews from the Kingdom. There is, then, every reason to believe that it was the Oxford murder which proved the last straw in toleration.

    A similar ritual case was one of the main stimulants to the King and Queen of Spain to expel professing Jews from that country in 1492 (Leese: Jewish Ritual Murder, p. 20).

    The Jews, in attempting to escape responsibility for these deaths by ritual murder, do not hesitate to impugn the probity of two of the Kings of England, against whose moral character no-one else has dared to cast a slur. Here are some examples. Firstly the Jew Hyamson (in History of the Jews in England, 1928 edition, p. 21) wrote: “It has also been pointed out that the Blood Accusation was as a rule made at a time at which the Royal Treasury needed replenishing.” This foul accusation against men of upright character was repeated in the Jewish Chronicle Supplement, April 1936, p. 8 (speaking of the Lincoln case in the reign of Henry III): “Henceforth and especially under the zealously Christian Edward I, the Crown and its officers became almost a worse peril to the Jews than mobs intent on loot and led on by fanatic priests and knightly spendthrifts who had borrowed Jewish money. When 18th century writers of history began to examine the old records in a new sceptical temper some may be found venturing on such unkind surmises as that the alleged crucifixions of Christian children only seemed to happen when kings were short of money.”

    To deny that the cases of St. William of Norwich and St. Hugh of Lincoln were Jewish ritual murders is to accuse certain English Kings, certain English Clergy, and certain English administrators, known to be men of good morals, of murdering and torturing Jews to get their money, after accusing them of horrible crimes. In the case of St. Hugh, the sentence was juridical; in the case of St. William, the mob took the matter into their own hands because the Sheriff would take no action himself.

    Whom do you believe – the Jews or the English?

    “It is difficult to refuse all credit to stories so circumstantial and so frequent.” So says Social England concerning ritual murders in England (vol. I, p. 407, 1893, edited by H. D. Traill).

    A significant fact is that Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates, at least up to 1847, quoted the ritual murders in Norman and Plantagenet England as undisputed facts. In later editions in the sixties, all mention of them is extirpated! We may take it that the Jewish Money Power began to dictate to the Press in England somewhere in the fifties of the last century.

    “Although Edward I’s 1290 edict of expulsion was not formally revoked as Manasseh [Ben Israel] had hoped, the resumption of open Jewish worship achieved the same practical result. The edict has actually not been revoked to this day.” Joan Comay: Who’s Who in Jewish History after the Period of the Old Testament (1974).

    Bibliography
    Abrahams, B. L. The Expulsion of the Jews from England in 1290 (1895).
    Adler, Rev. M. Jews of Medieval England (1939).
    Comay, J. Who’s Who in Jewish History after the Period of the Old Testament (1974).
    fitz Stephen, W. Materials for the History of Thomas Becket.
    Gregg International. The Jews of Angevin England: Documents and Records from Latin and Hebrew Sources, Printed and Manuscript, for the First Time Collected and Translated (1893).
    Leese, A. S. My Irrelevant Defence: Meditations Inside Gaol and Out on Jewish Ritual Murder (1938).
    Martin, C. T. Transactions of the Jewish Historical Society (1899).
    Parkes, J. The Jew in the Medieval Community: A Study of his Political and Economic Situation (1938).
    Ramsay, Capt. A. H. M. The Nameless War (1952).
    Richardson, H. G. English Jewry under Angevin Kings (1960).
    Roth, C. The Jews of Medieval Oxford (1951).

    http://www.heretical.com/british/jews1290.html

     
  60. Tyrion 2 says: • Website

    Welcome to Unzworld. The place where you are subtly encouraged to say whatever ridiculous and psychopathic thing the very worst side of you can imagine.

    But don’t worry, get comfortable, the host is not recording you. Or your IP. Really. Even if you use a VPN to disguise it, eventually you’ll stop bothering. You can relax in your derangement.

    Also, what an amazing picture of insanity this article’s comments add up to; and amazing how essentially no other sites on the whole internet have picked it up. Instead it is essentially only mentioned on some of the more rabid commenters’ personal projection spaces.

    Then again, my claim is probably not true if this comment gets through. Bit weird how I’ve not read anything like it before though…

    • Replies: @annamaria
     
    @pensword
     
    @Wizard of Oz