Colin,

Please watch the following documentary on the role of Jews in the Bolshevik Revolution and the Communists of Russia. I recommend it because the man who made it relies almost totally on the writings of Jewish historians and Jews involved in the Revolution.

Come on. You haven’t read Dante’s Inferno or works by Doctors of the Church (esp., St. Teresa of Avila) regarding Christians in hell. But apart from that, hell is merely eternal privation or eternal separation from God or eternal solitary confinement. While Christians in theory have an easier means to be united with God they also have a higher bar because of that means. And Church leaders have an even higher bar given their status— special grace or extra grace (St. John Chrysostom, Doctor of the Church, wrote that “the road to hell is paved with the skulls of bishops”).

Being raised a Southern Baptist(Christian Zionist)it took the roll out of the internet and a desire to learn the REAL facts, along with a few years research to learn of the truths of which you speak. One web site which was instrumental in my awakening to the dangers of Talmudic Judaism was “Come and Hear”. It is a great source of information on this subject.

http://www.gailallen.com/rel/writings/come-and-hear/c/navigate.html#menu

Ron, your article was very enlightening and very in depth. If America does not expel the cancer of radical Zionism which has infected her, she will surly be finished.

Yeah, pretty much, but most Christian believers these days try to soften it a bit, insisting that “burning in hell” is just a metaphor for separation from God.

You are a fool and Hitler was a fool. You are excused because no deeper understanding of reality (Liever Turks dan Paaps) is expected from a Dutch but Hitler being an Austrian Catholic is not excused.

Not exactly, though in some cases depending on the sect.

As far as traditional Catholic and general standardish Protestant teaching is concerned:

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03744a.htm#section6

Relevant section (I apologize for length):

You are a brave and courageous man, Mr. Unz. Bravo.

“Over the years prominent Israeli rabbis have sometimes publicly debated whether Jewish power has now become sufficiently great that all the Christian churches of Jerusalem, Bethleham, and other nearby areas can finally be destroyed, and the entire Holy Land completely cleansed of all traces of its Christian contamination. Some have taken this position, but most have urged prudence, arguing that Jews needed to gain some additional strength before they should take such a risky step. These days, many tens of millions of zealous Christians and especially Christian Zionists are enthusiastic advocates for Jews, Judaism, and Israel, and I strongly suspect that at least some of that enthusiasm is based upon ignorance.”

Yes, but the fact remains that Judaizing heresy always produces pro-Jewish culture and politics, including culture and politics that intentionally promote Jews and Jewish notions as part of the culture war to destroy ‘other’ Christians.

WASP culture is Exhibit A. And true-believing, including old time Puritan Judaizing theology believing, WASPs will back Israel even if Israel starts overrunning churches, turning them into synagogues or museums. The most obvious such people in America are the Pentecostal and, increasingly, Southern Baptist and other ‘fundamentalist’ Evangelicals, but all Mainline Protestant churches have their more country club version of the problem. George Will is an atheist version of the upper middle class Mainline Protestant form of WASP Judaizing.

I have zero doubt that 100% Gentile blood devout Evangelicals I know very well and know like me would play Oliver Cromwell and murder me, if their Judaizing religious leaders were to be convinced by Rabbis that doing so would spread ‘Bible truth’. Their religion is the direct fruit of Anglo-Saxon Puritanism, and until they are fully converted from it, they will follow its directives.

You cannot change that by changing church. It is religion that bubbles up from the cultural core. That’s the reason that English-speaking Catholicism is now as much a Judaizing mess in upper middle class form as is the Episcopal church.

You assimilate to WASP culture: you assimilate to Judaizing.

In a nutshell, that the reason that English replaced Yiddish as the international Jewish language. That is the reason that Jews from all the globe, speaking all languages, encourage the peoples of the world to become more Anglicized.

Blood passover is a beautifully written work on Medieval Venetian history it’s densely footnoted and and should be considered a work of Scholarship. But the most ‘democratic’ state in the middle east broke the man and stopped the work’s publication. Dr. Toaff deserved an award for his meticulous work.

The book gives a vivid potrait of jewish financial swindlers doing back then what they do now, control the banks and indulge in high level fraud.

I have read Dante’s Inferno and Limbo seems pretty decent. Nonetheless, that was merely Dante’s way of allowing the greats from classical times not to burn. Limbo was of course still in hell too.

I should have mentioned Goldwin Smith’s excellent essay, The Vexing Jewish Question – http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n1p16_Smith.html

and Churchill’s Zionism vs. Bolshevism – https://archive.org/details/ZionismVsBolshevismByWinstonChurchill

and E. Michael Jones’ outstanding The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit – http://culturewars.com/Reviews/RevolutionaryReviews.html

No. Hitler’s vision was of Germans making serfs of Slavs. Hitler’s great hero was the queer Frederick the Great, who alternated between Enlightenment ideas that sound gooey and tender, on the one hand, and desire, on the other, to revive the most amorally brutal forms of pagan German warring as life itself.

The Hitler problem is the Germanic problem, Continental form. WASP is the other form of the Germanic problem, each wing of which sees almost all other Europeans as inferior and fit to be ground into dust.

Hitler and Judaizing archetypal WASP Oliver Cromwell are not opposites. They are the two sides of the one coin.

Not Vatican II Catholicism, which is at least half-Protestant: the most stupidly liberal Mainline type of Protestantism.

Of course he did not.the truth does not matter on the edge of uranus,just the lube.

“Rome sent powerful armies.” Yeah, self-important since 66 AD. The six legions sent by Nero against Jews are precisely equal to the six legions he sent against Parthians – this was all Rome could muster in Middle East. The difference is that, of course, Parthians defeated Rome.

That Chief of Rome would be Elio Toaff (1951–2002), and not Israel Zolli (1940–1943), who converted to Catholicism.

Unz’s chain of masterpieces remains unbroken!

I strongly suspect that all of it is based upon ignorance.

So basically what we’re dealing with here is a kind of 3000 year-old Scientology.

They’ll probably believe it; they’ll just scratch their heads wondering how we were too stupid to see it going on all around us.

Before Hugh of Lincoln (1255) was William of Norwich (1144).
The Italian boy was Simone of Trento (known as Simonino di Trento), whose case was addressed by Ron commenting the ‘scandal’ provoked by the book of Prof. Ariel Toaff “Pasque di sangue” (Blood Passover). Simonino was beatified and his cult was extremely popular in Trento until 1965 when the Catholic hierarchy ‘desanctified’ him and forbade the public cult.
The ‘Syrian’ was Father Thomas, a French citizen originally from Sardinia, and the superior of a Franciscan convent at Damascus who disappeared along with his servant in 1840. The “Damascus Affair” brought the massive intervention of European, British and American Jews in defense of the culprits. “For the first time in American Jewish life, Jews… organized themselves politically to help Diaspora Jewry in distress.”
“For the Jews, the Damascus affair launched modern Jewish politics on an international scale, and for American Jews it represented their first effort at creating a distinctive political agenda. Just as the United States had used this affair to proclaim its presence on the global scale, so too did American Jews, in their newspapers and at mass meetings, announce to their coreligionists in France and England that they too ought to be thought of players in global Jewish diplomacy.”
In the same year (1840) we have also the “Rhodes blood libel” resulting in the same intervention from Europe. Salomon Mayer von Rothschild from Austria, Sir Moses Montefiore from England and Adolphe Cremieux from France (the founder of the Alliance Israelite Universelle) took the lead in fighting the ‘blood libel’

Well, the great Mr Unz, champion of free speech, has taken a giant step here. We’ll begin to hear stories about him now, he’ll be attacked personally in the mainstream media and attempts will be made to destroy this site, and to remove his presence in the public arena, or to defame him. None of his opponents will argue against him on facts, they will attack him personally, calling him names. which I guess is a kind of holdout from the days when people thought cursing someone actually worked. Let’s all hope Mr Unz survives these coming attacks, and the cause of free speech grows strong again.

While he shines a spotlight

My eyes! My eyes!

quote by Israel Shahak backs that up:

OMG, You found a Jew who said, “Blah, Blah, Blah.”

I think it was David Horowitz (the ex-communist turned Republican, not the consumer advocate) who said about Christians (I paraphrase): I don’t care if they think I’m going to Hell, as long as they don’t try to send me there. A very reasonable point of view, I think.

Of course, the same could be said of the Christians of that era too.

Here’s one of the Jewish “protesters” at the 2018 Academics’ Ball in Vienna:

https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-vienna-ball-right/protesters-arrested-at-right-wing-partys-vienna-ball-idUKBREA0N1MK20140124

And it is afterall well-known that conquerors routinely show their disdain for those whom they conquer by avoiding any relations with their women.

Perhaps pre-dating that was this:

The Portage to San Cristobal of A.H.

which caused a minor stir when it was published and adapted for the stage. I remember reading a review of the play in Newsweek, in which some of the dialogue was quoted and it expressed a similar idea. It was however, just a work of fiction.

DDOS attack in 3…..2…..1…..

A cursory search reveals this: https://www.unz.com/runz/meritocracy-response-to-prof-gelman-on-jewish-elite-overrepresentation/?highlight=baytch ; I don’t know if that’s the article of Ms.(?) Baytch’s to which you refer.

Could you link to the study you’re talking about, or some discussion or summary of it? What with you not being familiar with Mr. Unz’s articles and his possibly not being familiar with yours it seems there is a good deal of talking-past going on here. Here are some search results: https://www.unz.com/?s=crimson&Action=Search&authors=ron-unz&ptype=item ; here are some more ; https://www.unz.com/?s=crimson&Action=Search&ptype=item&commentsearch=include&commenter=Ron+Unz; and finally here are some more: https://www.unz.com/?s=self-identified&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=include&commenter=Ron+Unz

I haven’t gone through them all but these seem like relevant search terms.
By the way, Mr. Unz or anyone else, what’s the mysterious “postid” in the search url? The searches seem to work fine without it.

To be exactly precise, he found an iffen who said, “Blah, Blah, Blah.”

(He who lives by the quip…)

I think you’re on to something there.

I’ve often thought that there is a fatal flaw in the anglo-saxon race: the conceit of extreme individualism – I’ll look out for me and mine, and y’all can go to Hell. It explains a lot about America.

Sir Richard Burton, the famed explorer and great ethnologist of the nineteenth century, reached many similar conclusions during his inquiries into Judaism. While he was British consul in Damascus he attempted to curtail the activities of the Jewish merchants – who had committed abuses against the local population. Appealing to their coreligionists in powerful positions in England, they succeeded in helping to get Burton removed from his post.

After his death a jumble of Burton’s writings on the subject was published under the title “The Jew, the Gypsy and El Islam” (http://jrbooksonline.com/jgei.htm). Originally, the manuscript had included an appendix headed “Human Sacrifice Among the Sephardine [sic] or Eastern Jews” on documented cases of ritual murder but this was suppressed and has remained inaccessible. In recent years, however, the forbidden manuscript has briefly surfaced; being offered for sale at Christies but seemingly not reaching the reserve price of 210,000 pounds. There was huge controversy over the appropriateness of this offering so the actual fate of the work is unknown.

You think you have been conquered by Jews?

Fascinating article. Bravo, Mr. Unz! I’m as goyisch as they come, and I’ve always had a grudging respect for the Jews as survivors and capitalists while realizing that much of what Organized Jewry does is completely unethical. Seems they’re much more of a warrior people than we’ve suspected — like the Vikings or the Lakota or the Japanese, only secretly so. Indeed, seeing how the previous three groups are now emasculated shadows of their former selves, the Jewish approach has been the most successful. I must read Shahak’s book!

3000-year old Scientology! Love the metaphor!

If reincarnation exists, our Ron Unz has been in former life James Joyce or Dorothy Richardson. Karmic tendencies of stream-of-consciousness style of writing are so strong that he begins with Talmud & Kabbalah, then goes on to expulsions of Jews, usury, medical profession among Jews, Rabbinical nutjobs ..and then to Communists, Nazis, US Jewish ethno-nationalists, Kevin MacDonald, Solzhenitsyn & the rest. It is simply impossible to comment on all, or most of these topics.

Generally, the author has correctly described, in Jungian terms, Jewish “shadow” or inner devil, i.e. sum of destructive & negative tendencies of this entity (we can perceive any collective as an entity, a sort of super-personality as depicted, with different aims, in Hobbes’ “Leviathan”).

Where Unz is not fair, it is his reductionist view. He equates Jews with their (stereo)typical vices, which is the same mistake we make when we reduce a whole person to his loathsome traits, while ignoring laudable ones.

I’ll mostly c/p something I wrote before, with just a few extra points:

1. except (perhaps ?) some fringe sects, Talmudic Judaism does not worship Satan. The claim is simply a monumental nonsense. It is a misunderstanding that is frequently attached to another Middle Eastern sect, Yazidis, and in their case it is also a sort of spiritual calumny & gross disinformation (in our Western world, Cathars had been accused of the same perversion). Esoteric meaning of the role of Satan is just disfigured by orthodox religious literalists.

2. blood libel? Not convincing. As I’ve said before, it is true that human sacrifice had existed in virtually all archaic societies; it is also true that occult traditions frequently consider human blood as the most potent intensifier in acquisition of occult powers. Just, Judaism has gotten rid of human sacrifice long ago & there is no evidence that Jews (or Jewish occultists) had been practicing blood “potentiation” either in the first Christian millennium, or in Zoroastrian, Greek-Roman, Mesopotamian polytheistic & Islamic societies. Significantly enough, accusations of “blood libel” chronologically coincided with the rise of anti-Judaism in Western Europe & intensity of religious fervor we associate with Crusades. More, the claim that these rituals were, supposedly, uniform has not been corroborated. Even perfectly quotidian & normal Jewish religious practices significantly vary across time & place (Sephardim, Mizrahim, Ashkenazim,..).

As far as Jewish ethnocentrism goes- it’s the cornerstone of their religion & identity (which has been formed from, roughly, 700 BC to 100 AD). It is not a reaction, but the very essence of self- definition of that ethno-religious group & culture. Judaism is an imaginative refurbishing of other Near Eastern religions; it does not possess its own mythology. Normative Judaism- unlike Kabbalah- is a Platonized religion in many respects similar to early Confucianism: life’s fulfillment is achieved through learning, study & mostly mental work- and not piety, nor supernatural yearnings. Early Judaism, as recorded in the Pentateuch, had not possessed that idea. Somewhere around 100-300 A.D. Jews adopted Plato’s ethic of self-cultivation through intellectual work & produced a vast literature- from contemporary perspective- of, generally, dated & sterile Behemoth nitpicking trivialities (Talmud, Responsa, ..). There are some problematic passages in the Talmud with regard to Gentiles & Christians. Babylonian Talmud was composed from ca. 200-600 AD; it has 6,500 big folio pages & its English translation runs over 15,000 pages. So- why not openly say there are a few insulting passages that reflect early medieval spirit of times? Talmud is a mixture of wisdom literature (similar to Confucian “Analects”), various superstitions on magic & astrology, exegeses on murky passages of Hebrew Bible (frequently fantastic & hilarious), and mostly a codification of Jewish law, similar to Islamic shariah (agriculture, marriage, various taboos & ceremonies, crimes & misdemeanors, food etc.)

Christianity was mentioned only a few times in this library of books, almost always in negative light. Why not publicly say it’s obsolete in some areas? And that such fellows are, basically, freaks:

With regard to Judaism’s “ideological” spiritual arrogance, Shahak (and others) are right: their religious culture is essentially supremacist & there is no other spiritual tradition I know of that denies other people basically the same anthropological status in religious sense. In Kabbalah, which is esoteric extension of normative Judaism, only Jews possess divine portion of “soul”. Others do not.

We know from different Gnostic religious traditions that they all aver there is split between empirical human psyche & essential, divine Self (Buddhata/Buddha Nature in Mahayana Buddhism, Atman in Vedanta Hinduism, Daimon or Nous in Greek religion, Inner Man and Christ Logos in (Neoplatonic) Christianity, Angel Christ in Christian Gnosticism, ruh/spirit and Perfect Nature in Hermetic variants of Islamic Sufism etc.). Only in Kabbalah & other variants of Judaism they deny that other humans are, basically, the same as they are. According to them, only Jews possess Neshamah (which is divine), or “upper layers” of Neshamah, like Chaya and Yechidah. Such religious arrogance & spiritual autism do not exist, as far as I know, anywhere else.

For those interested in Jewish controversial topics, I would recommend Shahak’s books (as a beginning), then Lindemann & Walter Laqueur:

For a brief history & practice, Raynor & Goldberg (although they treat Pentateuch & Moses story as a proto-historical narrative):

Much more comprehensive history is classic Simon Dubnov’s monumental masterpiece.

If you are interested in Kabbalah, then crucial works by Gerschom Scholem & Moshe Idel, for instance:

For comparativist history of ideas, no one is better than Mircea Eliade:

Other topics (Nazism, Solzhenitsyn, Jewish role in Bolshevism & Hollywood,..) had been addressed elsewhere, and this post is already way too long ….

My thoughts exactly. This article may end up finally killing unz.com — it will now be (properly) understood to be a hate site by the vast majority of people made aware of it. Ron Unz must have, at some level, understood this when he was preparing the piece for publication. Which means that his article is an act of self-destruction.

If unz.com goes, so will iSteve. That’s the real tragedy.

That seems yet another good example of projection. Your plainly canned commentary is clearly contrived, but you do get high points for consistency.

Your comments rarely fail to amuse, but do you really think you’re accomplishing anything of value by making them? In case you’re wondering, they substantiate much of the author’s case against the arrogant fanatics.

True and they keep getting better.

I strongly suspect the same.

True without a shred of doubt.

Also, maybe “…charms, portions, spells, incantations…” should read “…charms, potions, spells, incantations…” 

Excellent article.

JEWS ARE EVIL…NUFF SAID!!

Lol, a short while ago I would have agreed with this article.

But the truth is simply that the whole world is always at war, all groups constantly war against each other.

The fact that Jews were kicked out of every country is trotted out as some highly significant fact pointing to the uniquely anti social character of Jewish culture, and I myself viewed it this way not too long ago – but every European country has been at constant and unceasing war for all of its history, and Asian victims of European aggression have found something uniquely anti social in European culture.

England, France, Italy, Spain, Germany – constant war. This is no different than Jews being constantly at war with every society among which they settle.

It seems to be the law of this world that every group with a distinct identity wages war against every other group to the extent of its power and ability.

Jews use cunning and deceit and money to wage war – Europeans tend to find this uniquely abhorrent, much preferring their own method of war which is physical strength and brutality, but I can find no reason why a physically stronger person has more of a “right” to impose his will on others than the cunning person.

Jews are remarkably clear headed about this – I have had Jews tell me that Jews cheat, but gentiles murder, and this is what one should watch out for in dealing with the two groups. History bears this out – but in truth, the roles could beeasily reversed under the right circumstances, as a weapon is dictated by the situation.

Each group uses its own distinct weapons, and views the weapons of other groups as uniquely “dishonorable”. But this is a part of the human comedy.

Jewish contempt and animosity for non Jews is very real and one can find any number of quotes in Jewish sacred scriptures which bear this out – but Jewish universalism and even respect and appreciation for goyim (!) is equally real and an important strain in Jewish culture, eschatology, and theory of this world and the end of days.

Like any pre modern culture, Jewish culture is complex, multi-faceted, and contradictory – a rigid, simplistic mentality of the kind produced by the excessive study of mathematics, science, or computer science is ill equipped to make heads or tails of a way of thought that is fundamentally richer and more complex and equivocal than the rigid simplicities of modernity, with its anxiety-based yearning for simple facts to anchor itself onto in a shifting quicksand world.

It would be interesting to contrast the anti social passages of Judaism with those of Christianity or other groups – for Christians, all others suffer eternal torments for not believing what they believe. Even Jews agree that righteous gentiles go to heaven.

It is all part of the human comedy – minds that are able to gain the larger perspective and soar high above the petty entanglements of group identity and self interest can look down on these skirmishes, engagements, and battles with each group vying for position, trying to paint its rival as uniquely capable of acts it itself commits daily, can look down on these things from the perspective of eternity and smile a bit.

But there are few such minds – and nothing is more exciting to most people than to do spend their lives in jockeying for some minor advantage over some rival group.

The one good point about this article is that Jews are indeed the enemy of every group they settle among, at least potentially, just as the English nation spent its history as a nation (now ending) in endless warfare against enemies near and far, against close neighbors and distant Asiatic kingdoms, according to the ancient law of group against group, individual against individual.

The correct way to view the attempt to find Jewish culture uniquely anti social by Europeans is as merely another skirmish in the war of groups, and as an attempt by Europeans to gain advantage over their rivals.

Of course, there is a way to escape this war of all against all, but in each generation only few succeed in doing so – ultimately, I hope, everyone will, as the cycle of reincarnation continues, and each individual advances up the rungs.

Don’t be silly. The Talmud is a vast collection of purposefully contradictory attempts to explain the written Torah. This makes the Torah, and the rest of the Old Testament, far more central to Judaism than the Talmud. Your weaselly attempt to avoid admitting this by focussing on his use of the word “most” is utterly irrelevant, especially given the relative inportant of the five books if the Torah versus the rest of the Old Testament.

Not that the Talmud can be described as one work anymore than Wikipedia, including its endless edits pages, could.

Ok, here goes:

I believe that Judaism controls the US, the EU, etc. The thing I just CANNOT understand is WHY!

Yes, Jews are intelligent, but they aren’t THAT intelligent; Jews are VERY ethnocentric, but that doesn’t explain it either.

The fact is that they make up only 1% or so of the worlds population; I’ve always thought that the bottom line is that force rules, but that doesn’t seem to apply in this case.

Why don’t gentiles and Asians simply take back what the Jews have stolen FROM THEM; how could they stop us? We outnumber them several times over, and have far more military power. I just don’t get it!

What do you think I am fanatical about?

Ask them what a ‘Nazi’ is.
Of course their answer will be ‘holocaust’ something,
Then ask them for actual proof.

Game, set, match.

http://www.codoh.com

That sounds pretty silly. There are a number of different crosses but overwhelmingly the Christian cross is depicted as having a shaft under the horizontal cross piece a good deal longer than the part above. The Red Cross is about the only reminder I can think of what is sometimes depicted on the shield or armour of a Medieval knight. Can anyone substantiate this tale?

If someone’s “loathsome traits” are leading him to try to kill me and my family I’ll end him on the spot. All the (fake) stories about his beautiful singing voice and his shiny jew-fro won’t matter, believe it or not.

Not to mention that this particular “person” tried it over and over again for two millennia and only grew more insidious after every non-lethal slap-down.

N e v e r a g a i n.

” … Two Hundred Years Together, and although that work soon appeared in Russian, French, and German, nearly two decades later, no English translation has ever been authorized.”

There are a number of volunteers that have translated “Two Hundred Years.” This does not negate the statement regarding, “authorized.” Further research may help verify following translation sources:

http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/banned-aleksandr-solzhenitsyn-two-hundred-years-together-almost-f

https://twohundredyearstogether.wordpress.com/

A web search will yield partial and occasionally complete translation in numerous PDFs.

Interesting interview with Solzhenitsyn regarding this last of his works:

http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/articles/ChukovskayaSolzhenitsyn.php

Ron Unz’s balls are so big they have their own gravitational field.

But he is technically Jewish, so he can only be labeled as a ‘self hating Jew’ and pitied accordingly, which is many times less trouble than being labeled an anti semite. For my money, I don’t think we’re going to see a particularly strong reaction. It’ll be easier for them to ignore it.

said:
““seething hatred” for Christians doesn’t jibe particularly well with the Jewish intermarriage rate, an actual verifiable statistic that’s conspicuous in its absence.”

That’s actually a survival strategy in an attempt to cleanup the diseased Jew gene pool.

The wife usually ‘converts’, and the children are usually raised as ‘Jews’.

And of course, very few Jew women look like ‘Wonderwoman’s’, Gal Godot.

There you go.

You really are getting sillier every day. Hitler didn’t want war indeed. He wanted what he wanted without having to fight. Gee whiz!

Black researcher, Dr. Tony Martin, let’s us know who the prime sellers & owners of slaves really were, Jews.
Dr. Tony Martin – The Jewish Role in the African Slave Trade

Jew slave ship owners

JEWS AND THE SLAVE TRADE

http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/jews–the-slave-trade.html

The more I learn, the more I am saddened by how little I know. This is a veritable magnum opus by Ron Unz. It is such a tragedy that this masterpiece of journalism will never catch the eyes of the majority of Americans while it still remains possible to save our souls. I am amazed by how many disparate and yet interconnected facts Ron has been able to weave into this short article. It is a testimony to the man’s brilliance and genius.

May angels protect him from the barrage of attacks that will haunt the remainder of his life.

Agree.

Link please. I went for BloggingHeads and it wasn’t there.

who was Ron Unz and about his Weltanschauung evolution.

Why the fifty cent motivation when a nickel will do the job?

He’s just as likely to be doing this out of spite towards the Jews that drove him from and denied him any success in the MSM business. What’s the analogy for a Jew with money that loves to fondle and count words rejected by the media business. A 7 foot tall black American that can’t dribble?

Chicago’s legendary journalist Mike Royko had it right when he dubbed Mario Savio’s antics at Berkeley as the Foul Speech Movement. It continues long after his passing. I have to admit that I’m still digesting this rather long article, but I’m impressed at the dispassionate tone of it. And at the similar tone of the link to Kevin MacDonald’s essay. Usually, such articles are so phlegm-flecked that I have to look askance at them. MacDonald’s essay seems to provide a rationale for the seemingly irrational fear of Christian America–a very tolerant bunch–by most of the Jewish commentariat. To the point that they eagerly endorse mass immigration by overtly anti-Semitic Middle Ostogoths and probably anti-Semitic peasants from Los Culitos del Sur.

Besides reiterating that we are all, gratefully, in Ron Unz’s debt, I’d just like to add – perhaps cynically – that I sure am glad I finished downloading Ron’s priceless collection of science-fiction and adventure pulps from the Internet Archive well before this essay’s appearance!

I’d also made copies of many, though certainly not all, of the samizdat texts storehoused there. (And you had best believe I will be downloading whichever titles I’d missed the first time just as soon as I finish typing this comment.)

Ron, a lot of people are going to tell you this took balls to write and post. And indisputably this is true. But what it really exhibits for all the world to see is intellectual integrity to match that courage. Unfortunately we live in an age when the highest order of both courage and integrity are found in the little boy who, seeing a naked emperor, describes reality as it is – not what an august company of VIPs would like it to be, let alone loudly insist that you’re actually seeing, except that you’re lying or crazy.

So, while you’re still here, and the angry/shrill/bloodthirsty tweets of the Good and Great have yet to fill the air like virtual confetti….thank you for this. You won’t be the first honest man they Bataan-march into the hinterlands of UnPersonhood – like poor Prof. Ross! – but, by God, maybe you can be the last.

Ron Unz was born a Jew and brought up as a Jew, so he must have had personal experience with the Judaism and with real living Jews. Apparently he had never heard or witnessed any of the fantastic rituals he describes and apparently believes to be true, and no one told ever him that he must hate Christians. To whom should he believe, to his own eyes and ears, or the bobbe-maises (crazy stories) of self-hating Jew Shahak? Unz seems to have lost touch with his own self and with palpable reality.

” … religious Jews apparently pray to Satan almost as readily as they pray to God …”

A text within the Kabbalah known as Zohar instructs Jews to make sacrifices to Satan so that he’ll focus on the goyim and leave Israel alone, or something like that. The Gnostics believe that the Old Testament Yahweh is the demiurge, a satanic god (not the transcendent God) that traps and tortures human souls on Earth.

“Even as late as the 1930s and afterward, international Zionist groups closely cooperated with the Third Reich on international economic projects … actually offered a military alliance to the Axis Powers …”

There exists a conspiracy theory that the theosophy-inspired occult groups active in Austria and Germany in the 1910s and 1920s which gave rise to the Nazi cult and its Hitler-god were infiltrated by Zionist Kabbalists for the purpose of creating something like Nazism, a religious-political system that would be turned on European Jewry, thus creating a burnt offering to Yahweh; a sacrifice to enable the creation of Israel.

” … the detailed descriptions of the Jewish ritualistic murder practices are very similarly described in locations widely separated by geography, language, culture, and time period … ”

And it is possible that these rituals share a common root: a supremacist death cult originating in ancient Babylon among the exile Jewish population from Judah.

” … the world is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine … ”

Indeed it is. Reality as presented by materialists negates the soul, and diminishes both beauty and darkness. Imagination is the divine spark given to us by the transcendent God. The above article is a high point in the American Pravda series.

In fairness …. that link shows what liberalism in the classic sense flourishes in Israel even if it is nowhere near a majority emotion.

First of all, I tip my hat to Ron Unz. He is looking satan straight in the eye and may god protect him.

However, once again I find reading this article to be frustrating because of all the milquetoast language used to try to keep an article that must be offensive to lying Jews from being offensive to lying Jews. Example:

So after centuries of lies about their murder of Christian children when finally the proof hits Ron right between the eyes, he squirms around and wiggles out of clearly stating the depth of the depravity and damage that Jews have done to Christians for centuries. But even worse, Christians have been persecuted, ruined, tortured, and murdered for even implying that these massive jewish crimes are true. Jew crimes were simply projected back on the goyim, the goyim were punished and the jews got away. When has that ever happened before?

ADL, SPLC, and all the other jewish hate organizations are nothing more that murderous cover up fronts for these crimes against humans with souls by jews, who clearly show by this practice that they are not of the same species as their victims. These goyim gaslighting organizations have been around for centuries twisting justice the same way jews twisted the dagger for years after stabbing Germany in the back in 1917.

It is important to note, that just as jews call goyim anti-semite and ruin their lives or murder them for mentioning this jewish genetic lust for the ritual extraction of the blood of goyim infants, so exactly do they call goyim anti-semitic and ruin their lives or murder them for asking jews to provide evidence for 6 million dead Christian haters in the holohoax.

Questions about the depth, depravity and history of jewish hate for goyim are one of the things that gods chosen people simply will not allow stupid goyim humans to ask. Its part of the Noahide laws that goyim across the west are forced to live under.

I very seldom call other posters trolls, but this, sir, is a troll post.

Thanks very much for the information. I did spend a few minutes on the internet looking for dates and names.

All I found of course was the evil blood libel and endless persecution of Jews by Christians and Popes. So I just posted what I remembered.

That’s hardly clear headed. It basically means that the Gentiles should be fought only when then start a war against you while the Tribe is “cheating” and scheming goyim demise 24/7/365.

How’s that Jewish IQ number progressing anyway? 95 sound wildly optimistic at this point.

With all due respect, I can but disagree on several points.

First, the author may be right about Jewish religion (I know next to nothing about it), but many secular Jews who break religious rules daily, support Israel and do their best to make its crimes look innocent. Many Jews and Gentiles, both religious and secular, present these crimes as non-crimes, simply because they are perpetrated against Palestinians.

Second, Russia in the 1990s. Yes, it was a catastrophe, wholesale looting of the country by the few who had no ethical scruples. Most oligarchs were not just thieves, but murderers as well, although, just like mafia bosses, they did not do murders personally, always delegating dirty work to henchmen. A typical example is Khodorkovsky, promoted by the Western media: it is almost certain that he ordered his head of security, Alexei Pichugin, to arrange the 1998 murder of Vladimir Petukhov, mayor of Nefteyugansk, which was done on Khodorkovsky’s birthday. Pichugin was sentenced in Russia to life in prison for ordering three murders, including Petukhov’s. While Khodorkovsky is Jewish (secular, as far as we can tell), Pichugin is not. What’s more, Gorbachev and Yeltsin, who brought Russia almost to ruin, aren’t Jewish, either. Both of them are rightly perceived by the majority of Russian population as traitors, which they are.

Third, Solzhenitsyn. In the context of Russian literature, he is third-rate at best. His literary talent is nowhere near that of the towering figures like Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, Gogol, or Pushkin. If we stick solely to the twentieth century and even exclude Tolstoy, Solzhenitsyn is nowhere near Bulgakov, Blok, and many others. The most adequate prescient description of him one can find in Dostoevsky’s Demons: it is hard to be a middling talent in Russian literature. Politically, he is also a very shady character. He claimed to have wanted to go to the front, which was the easiest thing to achieve in the USSR between 1941 and 1945, yet he always moved farther and farther away from the places where bullets and shells actually flied. He was imprisoned, but spent his time in VIP camps, not where rank-and-file GULAG prisoners were. If one wants to read a true account of GULAG, I can recommend Shalamov (who, BTW, always despised Solzhenitsyn as a liar and a fraud).

Finally, the crazy world we know today was shaped by a lot of scoundrels, some Jewish, some not. Just recent examples: Clintons (both of them) and Bushes (all of them) weren’t Jewish, but they have a lot of innocent blood on their hands. Same goes for Blair, Cheney, and many others. I believe that the criminals should be identified and ultimately punished, or at least condemned. I also believe pointing the finger at particular groups, religious or national, is no more than a red herring. Frankly, I am surprised and disappointed that Ron Unz, who runs a remarkably truthful site with real freedom of speech and true difference of opinion, is contributing to that deception.

Ms. Baytch took it upon herself to correct me, inter alia, at the very beginning of the comment thread to one of Mr. Unz’ many other postings here having to do with his meritocracy research:

http://www.unz.com/runz/asian-quotas-in-the-ivy-league-we-see-nothing/

As pointed out by me to Ms. Baytch, in our extensive replies to one another in that particular comment thread, the “Harvard Crimson” survey findings that she cites are (along with their being social-scientifically dubious per se) about incoming freshmen’s religious affiliations, not their ethnic descent or identity. My Jewish brother-in-law, who was an Harvard undergraduate at the same time as Mr. Unz, is deeply into his Jewish identity; but, he also is an avowed atheist, despite his being formally bar mitzvahed as an adolescent, and he never would have claimed to be “Jewish” in the actual sense that that survey was asking of its respondents. I strongly suspect that a majority of the freshman at Harvard who identify as being Jewish, ethnically and socioculturally, would not claim that Judaism was their personal religious faith, whether they were being asked the question by their student newspaper or by the United States Bureau of the Census.

In the 21st century world of internet discourse one thing I’ve internalized is the “crazy bomb”. There are some subjects, so fraught, that everyone is “triggered”.

I think that’s a big problem. To be triggered should be: to be disqualified from discourse of any consequence. I sincerely believe that. If I could put one limit on democracy, that would be my limit: does anything trigger you? … ok, then kindly go outside while the adults discuss serious matters, matters of consequence.

So what do we do when there are subjects that trigger: everyone? 90%, suffices, for “everyone”.

I’ve spent much of the last 18 hours wondering if I can ever post a comment on Unz again – not because of the substance of what Mr. Unz wrote – though there’s much to doubt and disagree with and I think that a charitable interpretation is that, that’s his point: to un-trigger us by forcing the triggering discussion.

But the reason I’ve wondered is: crazy bomb. Mr. Unz just dropped the most high-power crazy bomb I’ve seen maybe in my lifetime’s memory. Everyone will be triggered. Anti-Semites, “allergic” gentiles, and certainly Jews. Everyone.

Is discussion possible?

There is the story of the boy and the dinosaur – who found a dinosaur in his bedroom and his parents refused to discuss it because: dinosaurs don’t exist – and they remained steadfast in their refusal until the dinosaur’s limbs grew out the windows and legs through the floors and he walked off with the house.
Charitable interpretation: Unz is trying to get us to discuss the dinosaur

There is Howard W. Campbell Jr. A possibility that should terrify the bonafide anti-Semites who find a commenting home here. Another charitable interpretation.

And after we clear the crazy bomb and charitable interpretations, there’s finally your point. I’d like a word about that, and I worry it’s a word spoken in the dust cloud on the bottom floor of a building a quarter second after a bomb detonated in the basement and the upper floors are about to collapse on us.

But here’s the word.

It is said that the first crime is that one must not “name the Jew”. You are supposed to figure this out. Everyone is supposed to figure this out. It is a symptom of autism that one does not figure this out.

Because we will not discuss this many who do figure it out derive different conclusions about why this is a rule.

I would like to suggest to your point, and to Mr. Unz, that the most charitable reason for this rule is the true reason, and more importantly : it is a universal reason.

One must not “name the Jew” for the same reason one must not name : anyone – collectively.

That reason is: we are human, or cartoons. All acts of collective naming – reduce us from humans, to cartoons.

This is why I have argued consistently , on these comments, that people must stop adopting the term “white”. To adopt and accept this term, is to agree to be named, and to be named by people who know exactly what they are doing when they name you. They dehumanize you. They make it possible to collectively judge you and condemn you. By accepting the name, you hasten the advance of their heinous agenda.

And “they”, don’t need to be anybody at all. No Protocols are required, just Hobbes and Game Theory. It’s a war of man against man.

Unz is unfair here – dangerously so – but if this was intended as a light to lead us out of the darkness then it starts with this rule: let us stop naming … anyone. Collective judgment will be all of our collective doom.

What a well reasoned and well sourced response.

Nevertheless, the cardinal Lorenzo Ganganelli, later Pope Clement XIV, in his famous report of 19 January 1760, presented to the Congregation of the Holy Office, with which he intended in general to absolve the Jews from the accusation of ritual infanticide, made an exception in the case of Andreas of Rinn, as well as in the case of the martyrdom of Simon of Trent. The two cases were to be considered exceptional events, not to be generalized, but were nevertheless concrete and real:29
“I therefore admit as true the fact of the sainted Simon, the boy of three years of age killed by Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ in Trent in the year 1475 [...] I accept as true another crime, committed in the village of Rinn, diocese of Bressanone, in 1462, against the sainted Andrea, a boy barbarously killed by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ [...] I do not, however, believe, even admitting as true the true facts of Bressanone and Trent, that one can justifiably deduce that this is a maxim, either theoretical or practical, of the Hebrew nation,
104
since two events alone are insufficient to establish a certain and common axiom”.30

Don’t be silly. The Talmud is a vast collection of purposefully contradictory attempts to explain the written Torah. This makes the Torah, and the rest of the Old Testament, far more central to Judaism than the Talmud. Your weaselly attempt to avoid admitting this by focussing on his use of the word “most” is utterly irrelevant, especially given the relative importance of the five books of the Torah versus the rest of the Old Testament.

Not that the Talmud can be described as one work anymore than Wikipedia, including its endless edits pages, could.

Many thanks for this great summation. Those of us who’ve researched the subject for years find most of it quite familiar — it’s breathtaking to see it spelled out clearly for all to see here.

Here’s hoping and praying that your life doesn’t become palpably more difficult as a result of publishing this!

Its guys like Unz that makes the JQ a question. A lot of this if not known, its at least sensed and enough is actually known that if not for guys like Unz we would know exactly what to do.The terrible thing is the time we can put off a decision is almost up, ironically accelerated by the people in question, who it seems feel rather confident of late, even eschatonic. Well I’m prepared for whatever form the reaction/restoration takes and if need be and if Unz can make it to North Idaho or I can get a chopper or plane to him Ill see hes protected.

To a certain extant we’re all fools, so what’s the point?

Hitler was that rare leader who, it’s obvious, cared about what was happening to his people, and thought he could do something for their benefit so he probably was a fool in that regard.

Perhaps, though, you could enlighten us to some other ways he was a fool and name a few others who were not.

You never replied to her substantive points. You merely took the opening superficial rhetoric in her work and made a strawman out of it.

As I pointed out previously (to no reply):

Whomever that lady is (it doesn’t matter) applied the same technique that you used to estimate the percentage of Jewish National Merit Semifinalists to the percentage of Jewish Harvard students and found that Hillel was wrong.

Ergo, you are wrong. Your entire argument is based off the unjustified stats collected by a silly Jewish student organisation to engage in a little ethnic boosterism.

https://archive.org/details/youtube-O1MC4Am2c_Y

Razib Khan’s conversation with David Sloan Wilson hints at why Ron Unz’s cool, calm collection of information on “Oddities of the Jewish Religion” is necessary, welcome, long overdue, and one more effort at, not so much breaking the Jew taboo but rather, normalizing facts-and-logic based discussion of how one particular group that holds enormous influence over world events, functions.

Khan remains in the camp of the pusillanimous, desperately eager to “move on:”

Wilson failed to affirm Khan’s “dark direction. ” “What Kevin said has stood the test of time . . .”
and expanded:

Wilson refuses to let go, to the point of introducing the concept, parasitism:

Wilson seems to endorse the notion of normalizing the frank assessment of various group’s survival strategies; Ron Unz contributes to that project; Razib Khan resists.

“Adding further credibility to the notion that Christianity was created as an anti-Jewish weapon. “

This reminds me of one of John Carpenter’s lesser known horror movies, a 1987 gem called “Prince of Darkness”. In it, one of the characters makes a discovery that Jesus was a spirit (or possibly an alien!) sent to earth to warn it about and protect it from a very real and literal demon. The Church made the decision to keep this information under wraps, and convince its followers that things such as the Devil, Hell, and evil were abstract concepts rather than a very real manifestation.

Any Jewish communities that practice such things today must keep it extremely secret.

The internal security agencies of Israel might know if these practices go on in Israel but they will cover it up.

Regardless, from the point at which you say that the Talmud takes precendence to the written Torah (Old Testament), you’ve already jumped into fantasy land.

You can read the basis for that claim in The online Jewish Encyclopedia

Reading this I can’t help but be reminded of a passage written by Adolf Hitler, about the frustration of arguing truthfully with dishonest and purposefully obtuse Jews.

Hitler knew that in order to get what he wanted he had to make his opponents believe that if necessary he would wage war.
The Polish provocations made it necessary for him to really wage war.
Poland wanted war, GB not, is my idea, FDR wanted war.

An individual sociopath in a trust-based society will virtually always “win” his parasitic, extractive and sometimes lethal game because he’s the only one playing it. His targets just want to establish normal, trusting relationships. It has nothing to do with intelligence.

Interestingly enough, the alleged percentage of sociopaths in Western societies is 2%. That’s what shields them. For every sociopath, there are 49 non-sociopaths who will mostly operate, and experience, relatively normal interpersonal relationships which makes them susceptible.

Fortunately/unfortunately for the Tribe, their sociopathy is organised and multi-generational. It leads to great material successes in the short-medium term but that inevitably leads to massive blowbacks when their greed and hubris outstrips their stealth capabilities.

We will. The parasite’s hold on the brain and the endocrine system (authority and messaging) is falling apart.

Also, were 10 separate Englishmen to, without contact, write 10 separate independent books picking up parts of English History that might be construed, via the worst possible yet still just about reasonable light, as damning of English behaviour in particular times and particular places. That would be just 10 separate out there books.

Were someone else to collect all 10 books and summarise them adjacently in order to insinuate some sort of grand narrative which implied essential evil, then that person would be gravely mistaken. Surely they must realise how dishonest their argument would be?

Why on earth would anyone do such a thing?

No, it means the gentiles are always starting a war against someone (historically indisputable). And that Jews are always at war with someone. (Historically indisputable). But that both deploy different weapons, according to his capacity and circumstances.

The clear headed and honest person – .0001 of mankind – recognizes these facts objectively without getting hysterical about them.

Europeans fight each other incessantly, conquer most of the world – then complain that Jews used cunning, deceit, and the power of money to gain the upper hand over Europeans.

It’s really quite childish.

So cheating and scheming are uniquely bad while “honest” physical aggression that kills millions and lays waste to half the earth is “honorable” – its childish.

The clear headed philosopher understands that the biological world is a war of all against wall, and that cheating is quite as legitimate as physical violence in this war.

Of course, being a clear headed philosopher means seeing at least one level up from the biological realm – and those stuck in the biological conflict can only see “their side” and cannot attain to objectivity.

So I hardly expect you to see things from a larger perspective beyond “your side” – nor would it be healthy for you, so long as you are stuck in the biological combat of all against all.

But there are a tiny few who are poised to tip over into the blissful “extra biological” perspective – I write for this happy few, and do not expect people like you to understand me.

I know Unz is kinda lefty but in this sense hes far rightish, there really many more jews like him than the lads at stormfront will credit.I have thought as this is all bound to come to a head soon because internet/immigration, a way to avoid another holycause would be to begin now offering jews a way to opt in to whiteness on the record before the shtf, as part of this another option ought to be offered to go on the record as a pledged non combatant in return to safe passage to israel in the event, you cant fault a jew or anyone for group loyalty.But some jews I think really are able to choose loyalty to their white genes over their jew genes and there’s not enough of them and they are 60% euro for us to worry about the hybridization. Thus force the hostile jews declare themselves as such and avoid the nuremberg situation. This registry so to speak would have to be done by jews and would cause quite a stir if it took off, but it might actually end up defusing the coming civil war which is very likely to become a race war if isnt forestalled. Jews coming out in significant enough numbers as white nationalist before hostilities is the only way I see as avoiding war, its in their interest as they will certainly be held accountable for a lot of the wars causes. Wars to not allow for nuance and good people are going to be forced to choose the lesser evil or the greater truth. whites are also going to have to be pragmatic and wont be able to execute half their own for war crimes so a scapegoat will be required. Lets get the actual goats on the record ahead of time and let jews who identify as whites do so and jews who simply loyal but not hostile jews opt out of hostilities.

If you say that only European peoples built a Christian civilization, then is the Jew Testament wrong? Was the Apostle Philip mistaken to recruit Africans into the church? Was the Holy Spirit in error for providing teleporting services afterward? (Acts 8:26-40) Did the first Christians at Antioch commit an error including Simeon the Nigger (Black man) in the church and elevating him to a position of leadership of “prophets and teachers?”

If, as you say, Jewish culture will always be viciously anti-white Gentile, then why do you worship a viciously anti-white Gentile who railed against Gentile White Patriarchy (Matthew 20:25, Mark 10:42, Luke 22:25) and demanded one “hate” and “forsake” their own blood and soil?(Luke 14:26, Matthew 19:27-30)

Is not the Jew Testament itself thoroughly Judaizing?

“WE WORSHIP what we do know, for salvation is from THE JEWS.” John 4:22
Acts 3:25 “He said to Abraham, ‘Through your offspring all peoples on earth will be blessed.’”
Romans 1:16 “The Jew first.”
Romans 9:4 “The people of Israel, chosen.”
Romans 15:27 “For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.”

Comments by Mr. Unz on the matter and some of my own as well. Follow the links provided underneath the quoted passages for more in-depth analysis, commentary, etc.:

Thank you Mister Unz.

You don’t know what you are talking about and furthermore do not make sense. If the Talmud is about explaining the Torah, why does that make the rest of the Old Testament far more central to Judaism than the Talmud? The only weaselly attempt going on around here is you failing to acknowledge that you didn’t know the Torah is not the Old Testament.

Jewish tradition says that God dictated the Torah to Moses atop Mt. Sinai. Not so the rest of the Old Testament. So it makes sense that Jews would regard it less.

Why do jews want to control the world ?
I do not know.
Why did Baruch bring FDR into politics to start a world war ?
Why does Soros want to control and change Hungary ?
Both men were seen as second rate citizens when they were young, Baruch in the USA.
Soros as a child experienced anti semitism in WWII in Hungary.
Baruch’s father fled anti semitic Germany around 1870, from memory.
Their motives, fear, revenge, lust for power, some mixture, I do not know.
If you read Stephen Steinlight fear does exist.
And indeed, it cannot be denied that christianity persecuted jews, Islam far less.
When christian persecution began, suppose no later than when the Roman empire became christian.
The reformation of Luther was no improvement, Luther seems to have hated jews.
Just in the 19th century jews became equal civil rights in most countries.
But, writes Katz, these equal rights were given in the expectation that jews would disappear through assimilation.
The opposite happened, jews continued to intermarry, had close economic cooperation.
‘From prejudice to destruction’, Jacob Katz, 1980, Cambridge MA
Some jews developed loyalty problems:
Jakob Wassermann, ‘MEIN WEG ALS DEUTSCHER UND ALS JUDE’, Berlin 1921
His novel to me seems a great description of how jews felt
Jakob Wassermann, ‘Die Juden von Zirndorf’, 1897 1999 München
Of course there were assimilated jews galore, in western countries, most of them sephardic, and anti zionism, what they saw as an insult to them.
Gilad Atzmon, who describes himself as ‘Palestinian jew’, he was born in Israel, wants collective psychotherapy for all jews.
As to ritual murder, I nowhere ever saw convincing proof, just accusations.

Second, the article gives the impression that there is some some kind of monolithic Judaism. That’s obviously untrue: Jews are some of the most quarrelsome, dissent-prone folks around.

That is nonsense – 85% of all Jews of all stripes, 100% of the time, support Zionist Israel and its mendacious occupation of Palestine. The vast majority of US Jews work to use the US government and taxpayer for Israel.

It is an outrageous lie to say that Jews do not collude politically.

Think Peace — Do No Harm — Art

“Jews spent two thousand years living as a diaspora people, and their tightly-bound trans-national colonies provided them with a uniquely effective international trading network.”

_________

The most dangerous word for Arabs and Muslims is the word “diaspora” when it refers to Jewish dispersion out of Palestine. Its meaning is not in dispute – that a people known as “Israelite” were dispersed two thousand years ago and their descendants have a “right of turn” to that specific location from which they were dispersed. Therefore, the Arabs have enemies scattered around the world, specially in the Western world, who demand to exercise that “right of return” by force and with the help of the powerful Western nations where these “diaspora people” live. The idea that the white Jews who originated in Europe and the black Jews of Africa and the brown Jews of the Middle East originated in Palestine is totally a childish notion. 95% of world Jewry is Ashkenazi at confirmed DNA of 99% European and 0% Middle Eastern. The sooner we dismiss this fraud called “diaspora”, the more peaceful our world will be.

________

” their tightly-bound trans-national colonies”

Does anybody know what “colonies” it is referring to?

There is an oblique reference to a possible modern-times “blood libel” incident in the BBC series, “The World at War”, one of the best documentaries of WW II I have seen. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_at_War#Episodes) The penultimate episode of that series, “Reckoning (April 1945)”, deals with the aftermath of the war, particularly the continuing mass carnage, involving tens of millions of further deaths, which are ignored in most narratives.

One incident, described in that episode, involved the return of two young Jewish men from a German concentration camp to their native village in Poland. Shortly after their return, these young men kidnapped and killed a Christian child. The Christian villagers responded with a pogrom in which some seventy odd Jews were killed. There was no further discussion of this incident in this episode of “The World at War”.

Most of my close friends are Jews. I’d always thought the “blood libel” was superstitious nonsense. But the bare outlines of this post-WW II incident made me re-evaluate that particular personal opinion. This well-documented incident closely paralleled, in its general course, the many stories of “blood libel” incidents from European history and folk lore. A little research confirmed that, although widely separated in time and place, these incidents and even details of these incidents resembled one another markedly. Even a far lesser extent of similar confirmatory evidence for other rumored medieval activities would result in a widespread professional agreement that such activities did occur.

Another interesting aspect of these stories is that they often hint at pederasty and other sexual perversions. The revelations of perverse sexuality among our “elites”, and particularly Jewish elites, e.g., Harvey Weinstein, Roman Polanski, Woody Allen, to name but a few, suggest that that such perversity may be more common among Ashkenazim than non-Jewish Europeans. Credence is lent this hypothesis by the fact that surveys of sexual behavior in Israel find reported rates of homosexual behavior that are several times higher than in any other country.

High intelligence does seem to be related to various mental health issues, e.g., depression. I wonder if inbreeding and the cultural selection for high IQ in Ashkenazim, might have had additional negative consequences besides such autosomal recessive disorders as Tay-Sachs disease, Niemann-Pick disease, and Canavan disease. These are all diseases that primarily affect the nervous system. It seems probable to me that less conspicuous malfunctions of the brain, e.g., conditions encouraging abnormal sexual behaviors, might also be more common among Ashkenaz Jews.

Is it??? That is what “they” want us to believe, I did not state it, old newspapers from the 1840′s and 50′s did. The Press was a bit more free then, and truth could actually be spoken then???

The Torah is the most important part of the Old Testament. According to Judaism it was handed down by God. I said that the Talmud, an endless Jewish squabble on the meaning of the Torah, was less important. You disagreed. You’re wrong.

Fake quote or not, somebody knew something then???

check out Mike King and his books on history. I read 2 of them and they definitely changed my view. At the very least it became clear that the victors write the official history but it is not necessarily the truth.

Note: Many of his works have been removed from Amazon in a culling that took place a few years ago because they were deemed anti-semitic.

http://www.tomatobubble.com/worldwarii.html

Germany and Italy were the only two developed countries that extricated themselves from the Great Depression without resorting to war. They did this primarily through massive, publicly-funded development of infrastructure, e.g., Hitler’s Autobahn and the related mass production of Volkswagens and Mussolini’s getting the railroads to run on time. Orwell, no fan of the Nazis, admitted that German youths were much healthier than British youths; the former had thrived under the economic and social policies of the Third Reich. Eisenhower, actually emulated Hitler when he became President. It’s rather obvious that the USA’s interstate highway system, which Eisenhower used as a tool to boost the postwar US economy, was modeled on the Autobahn system Eisenhower observed in occupied Germany.

Do jews have to take more heed of their rabbis, than the actual written words of their God??

In this article we finally have the substantiation the jewish blood sacrifice is and was necessary for magik and religious ceremonies, and then Lihn comes along with a link to an article with a lying jew statement like:

Sorry, if jewish neighbors had been murdering your children for thousands of years, then lying about it and then persecuting anyone who found out and wanted to put a stop to it, then those jews DESERVED EVERYTHING that those vile jewish talmudic rabbi’s managed to spit and project at Hitler.

Child murdering jews, and all those jews who protect them, and all those jews who don’t go to the law to expose these child torturers and murderers, are culpable. In short, all jews have a width and breadth of guilt and shame that makes their beloved “Nazi’s” look like kindergarten teachers.

I have been in the market for a corroboration of Michael Hoffman’s viewpoint on the religion, and this certainly seems to go as far, even further.

O boy this is pointless.

You mischaracterized what Ron Unz said about the Old Testament by identifying the Torah as the Old Testament. I merely pointed that out, which you thought was “weaselly.”

I never said the Torah was less important than the Talmud. Many authorities say that it is; I really don’t know if it is or not. But it stands to reason that the rest of the Old Testament is less important than the Talmud. Nor is that a controversial opinion, even if you personally don’t enjoy the Talmud.

“For the last two thousand years, Jews have almost invariably existed as small, relatively weak minorities living in the lands of others, whether Christian or Muslim, so a religious doctrine so unswervingly hostile to outsiders has naturally presented considerable obstacles for peaceful co-existence.”

a) 95% of world Jewry are Khazar converts who did not convert till the 9th century and therefore they are not those whose ancestors were the ancient Hebrews. They are as European as the rest of the Europeans only whose religion is Judaism.

b) I think the Jews of Muslims did not face hardly the hatred and animosity the Jews of the Christian West did. The white Jews of the West set themselves apart from the rest of society in the way they dressed, the language they spoke whereas the Jews of the Arab countries were indistinguishable from the rest of the Arabs, they looked like them, spoke the same language, sang the same music, danced Arabic dances and cooked Arabic foods. There was in fact peaceful coexistence among the Jews, Muslims and Christians of the Arab countries.

c) I am wondering how Jews living in Canada or America or Australia can be considered to live in the countries of others? The Ashkenazi Jews have no other origin except for Europe and if they were dispersed, it was out of Khazaria and not out of Palestine. That has to be made crystal clear.

Tyron 2, perhaps you are confused about being a Jew. You sound more like a Karaite. This is what you get in Rabbinical Judaism concerning Talmud:

Is Judaism possible w/o Talmud? Karaites did not accept Midrash or Talmud.

Karaites seem to be strict and do not circumvent rules by using Shabbos goys, so no light on Shabbat means no light.

Nazis exempted Karaites form their anti-Jewish laws. Some Karaites were accused of collaboration with Nazis but at the same time some were helping to hide Jews from Nazis.

“If nearly all Jews for a thousand or two thousand years were taught to feel a seething hatred toward all non-Jews.”

Again, you need to say “Ashkenazi Jews” since the Arab Jews did not have “a seething hatred toward all non-Jews”. Arab Jewish children played together, Arab Jews attended Muslim wedding, funerals and other events – and vice versa. Mahmoud Abbas challenged anyone to show him incidents where Arab Jews were discriminated against for just being Jews and he said there were no such incidents. The fact that the more than 100 expulsions of Jews were out of European countries and not Arab countries is the best evidence there is that the European Jews were not hated for being Jews but for their conspiracy to undermine the nations using financial systems.

What’s truly astounding to me is the large number of stepin fetchit shabbiest goyim in politics, media, universities, et al., who are almost as fanatical as the Jewish berserker types (to borrow Ron Unz’s description) in promoting everything which will destroy their own civilization. How, in God’s name, could they be oblivious to the kind of society they are promoting and the kind of society which their children will inherit?

This is all very interesting, and I would hope that just observing the obvious would be enough for lights to go off in most people. All one has to do is listen to the Jewish media, comics, writers, activists, politicians, etc., to understand the obvious loathing that they have for others, mostly white Christians in the U.S. and Europe. I wouldn’t doubt that there is something sinister and dualistic in the Jewish religion, but it is extremely sad if finding that out is what it would take for non-Jews to understand that they are the declared enemies of Jews just for being alive. At this point, I’m not even sure that most American Christians would act if it were true that many Jews are Satanists.

Non-religious Jews are often just as toxic as religious Jews, so the whole group and culture seems to be shot through with hostility. Since that’s the case, only an idiot would not oppose organized Jewry, Judaism, Jewish power, the Jewish culture and collective, and a large number of individual Jews. Being anti-Semitic is rational, whereas being anti-Christian, anti-White, anti-other, anti-European, on the part of Jews is, largely just an act of fanatical aggression, especially in America.

I knew two students of Jacob Neussner (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Neusner#Political_views) who planned on being Conservative Jewish rabbis. Over beers one night they told me a story – whether from Talmud, Midrash, Targum, or another source I cannot say. Several rabbis were arguing over a point of Torah. One finally said that if God himself came down and disputed his interpretation he would still hold by it. After a shocked silence, God spoke and commended the rabbi for his understanding of the law. My friends cited this as evidence that proper Jewish doctrine was that for Jews Talmudic interpretation was the final arbiter of correct behavior.

Trotsky’s family had thirty house servants. He was a millionaire. His father was not a farmer of the land, he was a farmer of peasants, owning villages. As head of the party Lenin’s personal income was yearly in the millions also, in today’s dollars. Many people are out of touch with reality because they want to be.

Direct link to the Kevin MacDonald discussion:

Although I have not seen Prince of Darkness since the early 90′s, I remember it being one of the top 3 scariest movies I had ever seen, up there with The Omen and The Shining. (The Exorcist being a slightly distant 4th.)

Ostensibly fake. E.g., from the infallible Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Race_Will_Rule_Undisputed_Over_The_World

However, this does not rule it out as being described like that old Rathergate memo: fake, but accurate.

Great article, Ron, but I must insert a complaint about the much ballyhooed chart that you included about labor compensation vs. labor productivity (since 1973). It suggests that worker productivity has progressed steadily, but worked compensation has not. Kevin MacDonald also has fallen for this chart.
It suggests a “bills on the sidewalk” scenario under which capitalists can hugely profit for decades on end by employing and underpaying productive workers.

The chart has two grave defects:
It compares the labor productivity of the ENTIRE LABOR FORCE to compensation for private sector production and nonsupervisory workers
It uses two different price indexes, one to measure real productivity and another to measure real compensation.

Overall productivity has continued to progress, but, measured separately, the productivity of production and nonsupervisory workers has not–because, influenced by Jews, the culture rotted. The stagnation in pay that these workers have experienced reflects their stagnant productivity. There is no automatic, easy profit to be had by employing them.

“Coming wartime plunder” is what the jews were counting on when they declared war on Germany in 1933. Wartime plunder is what germany was paying to jewish banks in the form of reparations, when Hitler came to power and said Nein. So the jews started WWII in order to plunder Germany, France, Poland, and all of central Europe.

I have been contending for weeks here at unz.com that jews, who like to consider themselves “smart”, are really as dumb as jackasses wearing blinders. A glaring example of their willful ignorance would be blood sacrifice, which the majority of jews think is, and Unz still hints at just to feed their willful denial, is a “Christian Superstition”.

Even though their tribe has clearly regularly been murdering and torturing infants over the centuries and then trading their blood and organs for profit, Jews simply don’t want goyim to know that they know. Clearly, neither does Andrew Gilbert, a “Jew raised in the Reform tradition”, who is, typically for a heeb, afraid to even mention the jews greatest achievement: rituals and sacrifices with goyim infants. Hundreds of different types.

If he really believed Blood Sacrifice is false, and an extreme slander, then Gilbert should have been indignant. Or, he knows but he lies. Like Eli Weasel’s “It happened in my mind”, or in Gilberts case “There was never blood sacrifice in my mind”.

Colin Wright—Appendix D to Robert Wilton’s The Last Days of the Romanovs (1920) lists the members of the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party, the Extraordinary Commission and the Council of Commissars, along with their ethnicities. Wilton writes, ‘According to the data furnished by the Soviet Press, out of 566 important functionaries of the Bolshevik State, there were…457 Jews.’ The appendix begins on page 184, HERE.

The Germans never referred to themselves as ‘Nazis.’

It’s a certain group who keeps that word alive and front and center.

Now, who could that be?