Šta se krije iza drugog talasa? 183,503 views•Jul 9, 2020; 54:11 min.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0R9NQLTqNEw
BosnianPyramidsTV
27K subscribers
Dr. Semir Osmanagić razotkrio globalnu i lokalne igre oko nastavka virusne psihoze. Naučna argumentacija, praćena sa istraživanjima nobelovaca i nezavisnih stručnjaka, s primjerima dokle ide agresivnost glavnih svjetskih igrača. Pogledajte gdje dr. Osmanagić vidi izlaz za čovječanstvo.
-
Misli srcem
1 week ago
Poštovani dr. Osmanagiću, hvala za još jedan odličan video...mislim da je večini ljudi već jasno da covid-19 nije prirodni virus, da je namjerno pušten i da je strašna negativna propaganda poharala svijet...evo sad drugi val ili neki kažu nije drugi samo nastavak prvoga...zatvaranje ljudi u kuće, manipuliranje mrtvima, nepouzdani testovi, uništavanje gospodarstva, sluđivanje ljudi strahom od bolesti i neizvjesnošću...strahota, to je takav grijeh i kriminal ...Neki vodeći ljudi poput predsjednika Bjelorusije, Burundija, neki liječnici, nobelovci koji su reagirali protiv WHO- a odmah su napadnuti, omalovažavani, možda i ubijeni, ucjenjivani...a što reći da su siromašnim ljudima nudili novac da potpišu da su im bližnji umrli od covida...STRAŠNO...LJudi sa maskama šetaju po šumi...jedni govore maske obavezne, drugi kažu maske ne pomažu, čak su i štetne...ljudi se ne bi trebali družiti, grliti, rukovati...djeca ne bi trebala ići u škole, na igrališta, ...razmak između čovjeka i čovjeka 2m....PRESTRAŠNO...dokad, dokad ljudi ....I jako mi je žao što primjetim dr.Osmanagiću da nema smiješka na vašem licu u cijelom videu...zato molim vas koliko sutra idite u šumu oko piramida i snimite nam jedan zanimljiv video onako kako vi znate, izaberite neku temu iz povijesti ili iz bilo čega da sklonimo tugu s lica i da pokažemo da smo normalni ljudi, da se družimo, volimo, poštujemo...da nismo povjerovali u novo normalno, inače kad to čujem tlak mi skoči....znači, staro normalno, živimo i radimo kao što smo i prije prokletog Covida-19, ili će nam doći cov-20, pa cov21...još jednom, budimo normalni...pozdrav svim LJUDIMA cijeloga svijeta.
381
Jim Morisson
Jim Morisson
1 week ago
Svaka čast Osmanagiću, zadovoljstvo mi je slušati sva tvoja predavanja i izlaganja oko bilo koje teme i problema koji se događaju u Svijetu.Imam sreće da živim u doba Dr.Semira Osmanagića.Tvoj rad će se sa vremenom izučavati u školama gdje im je i mjesto.Pozdrav iz Zagreba i pune sreće i uspjeha u daljnjim istraživanjima.
197
Snjezana Poznjak
Snjezana Poznjak
1 week ago
Pozdrav iz Hrvatske, sirite istinu da se narod probudi i da nest se napravi za bolju budućnost na Balkanu
142
Mama Alisa svijet cuda all you need
Mama Alisa svijet cuda all you need
1 week ago
Obozavam te slusati.. TI SI lijek za dusu i za sve bolesti.. TI SI NAS GOOGL,, KOJI NAM SA DUSOM DAJES SVE VAZNE INFORMACIJA I ZNANJA.. THX
98
Milan Stanic
Milan Stanic
6 days ago
PLANIRANO JE DA OVO STANJE ILI SRANJE TRAKE TRI GODINE I VEĆINA BUDE VAKCINISANO. SVETSKU ZDR. ORGANIZACIJU TREBA UKINUTI I FORMIRATI ZDRAVU. SVAKI VIRUS SE MOŽE ISUSITI I KASNIJE PONOVO PUSTITI. TO I RADE I AKO UZROK SMRTI NIJE VIRUS VEĆ NETIPIČNO ZGRUSAVANJA KRVI USLED ČEGA SE LJUDI OTRUJU SVOJIM UGLJEN DIOKSIDOM. NAJOPASNIJI VIRUS JE DUBOKA DRŽAVA I NJENI POLITIČARI ŠIROM SVETA.
104
Ranko Jardas
Ranko Jardas
1 week ago (edited)
teroristi višu nisu naoružani samoubilačkim odjelima,punim exploziva,danas su teroristi financirani od svjetske zdrastvene organizacije i svjetskih moćnika a naoružani su virusima i cjpivima
144
KruNosLaV Lucky Star
KruNosLaV Lucky Star
1 week ago
Hvala i bravo gosp.Sam
Najkvalitetnije Vijesti koje sam pogledao u zadnjih 20 godina
86
Marco Rossi
Marco Rossi
3 days ago
Signior Professore ovde u ITALY , BERGAMO MI, isti PROBLEM,, PLACAJU ljude ako cute, ali jedan dobar deo GRADJANA je podnio tuzbu( STVORILI su Associjaciju ) UDRUZENI GRADJANI su DOBILI obdukcije MNOGI su umrli zaradi pogresnog prikljucivanja na RESP,, MEDJA OVDJE TOTALNO CUTE , CENZURA ,, RUSI SU DOBAVILI 15 NAJVECIH AVIJONA PUNIH MEDIC, POMOCI I 137 DOKTORA I 30 DISINFEKC,, NEMA NIGDJ JEDNE VIJESTI,, MI TO PRATILI SAMO PREKO SPUTNIK,SRB, I SPUTNIK,IT. OVDJE SAMO BLLU KANAL PRENOSI NA YT PRILICNO A DRUGI CUTE I LAZU, LAZU,, PRIKAZIVALI SU VOJNE KAMIJONE PUNE MRTVIH A TO LAZNI FILM NIJE OD KORONE NEGO 3 GODINE UNAZAD SNIMAK OD ZEMLJOTRESA ,,
10
Dario Grgurić
Dario Grgurić
1 week ago
Prvi puta u životu slušam realne vijesti! Kada su sljedeće? Jedva čekam
89
Gorski Nunavut
Gorski Nunavut
1 week ago
Свака част Семире!
Посебно је битно, што си нам презентово ситуацију у Танзанији и Бурундију.
СЗО је криминална глобална организација.
110
John kelan
John kelan
1 week ago
Hvala dr Semire i čast mi je da sam vas nedavno i uživo upoznao. lijepo je upoznati poslanike iz drugih dimenzija koji poput zraka svetlosti potiču ljude na više frekvencije i pomažu cijelim nacijama i planetu na preobrzbi u dobro na dugi harmonije VLC. selem
81
adydaddy
adydaddy
3 days ago (edited)
43:26 Umro sam od šoka 😆
Da vas upozorim,ako koristite slušalice nemojte da pojačate na 100% glasnoću.Ovaj predsjednik Tanzanije je poput Tite našeg,svaka mu čast prije sebe stavlja svoj narod i državu.Da imamo takvog u našoj državi.A za tebe Dr. Semire ide zaslužen sub i like.Svih 54 minuta odgledao bez pauze.Ujedno naučio nešto,a vaš smiren glas je bio poput meditacije.
HVALA 🙂
13
Rita Lans
Rita Lans
1 week ago
Semira sam licno upoznao vrh vrhova mount everest balkana.Steta sto nemamo vise Semira da ovaj narod osvijestimo .
75
jelena panic
jelena panic
1 week ago
I od mene veliko hvala.Zahvaljujuci vama sacuvasmo zdrav razum.
73
Boxdial
Boxdial
1 week ago
E slazem se gospodine sa sesirom da je ovo sve globalna psihoza i manipulacija nevidjenih razmjera, zalosno da vecina ljudi nece da se odupre tome vec ide niz rijeku pa gdje ih skrsi i polomi
193
Guter Kritiker
Guter Kritiker
1 week ago
Corbett report _ YouTube Kanal, vrlo interesantan. 🤔
Proširuje horizonte.
23
Taj Dziii
Taj Dziii
1 week ago
Slazem se i podrzavam u svim tackama 100%
61
SMile Mix
SMile Mix
1 week ago
Vjecno uzitak slusati.Hvala Semire na hrabrosti iznositi sve ovo
21
Eyedol
Eyedol
1 week ago
Samo nastavi majstore!, ima nas, budni smo!
30
Zdravka Istuk
Zdravka Istuk
1 week ago
kako je lijepo slusati vijesti kada je voditelj interesantan😁 iako vijesti nisu bas lijepe o boze sta se sve desava hvala semire👍❤
24
lala
lala
1 week ago
Hvala vam Semire, sto sirite istinu i budite duse. 💕
34
Dijana Veselinov
Dijana Veselinov
1 week ago
Докторе, капа доле, да нам је више тако образованих људи
63
Niki 23
Niki 23
1 week ago
Mene nebrine Covid 19 nego lječnici koji bi trebali pomagati ljudima i kojima bi trebali vjerovati. Novac je bitniji od života jadna li nam majka svijet je otišao u K....!
28
Ljiljana Canic
Ljiljana Canic
2 days ago
G. Osmanagića za predsednika(male zemlje između Moldavije, Rumunije i Ukraine), a ne ovi bilmezi,lažovi i secikese! ❤️
3
Dino H.
Dino H.
1 week ago
Bravo Semire, sve receno kako jeste a svako ima pravo vjerovati u sta zeli: bio jednom davno jedan narod (covjecanstvo) koji je vjerovao svemu sto mu televizija kaze
46
Nevena Radovic
Nevena Radovic
1 week ago
Predivni i fenomenalni Dr. Semir, kao i uvek, top of the line!!! Bog Vas poziveo 🙏❤️🌍
20
nada zulovic
nada zulovic
6 days ago
I sta ce covecanstvo preduzeti povodom ovog haosa? Dozvoliti? Izgleda da ce dozvoliti..samo Bog Gospod moze da nas spasi! Da nam dometne pameti i razuma!
22
value760
value760
1 week ago
Agenda Elite do konacnog porobljavanja drzava!
9
Elvira Kurbegovic
Elvira Kurbegovic
1 week ago (edited)
Podrška gosp Osmanagiću u njegovom radu👍Italijansko ministarstvo zdravlja dalo izjavu da covid 19 pojačan 5G elektromagnetnim zračenjem izaziva upalu i hipoksiju...
62
Marko Bosnjak
Marko Bosnjak
1 week ago
Plan je ujedinit svijet u NWO. Ja koji nisam informisan puno znam taj podatak vec preko 10 god. Ocu reci, sta se ljudi sada cude kad je to sada u tijeku. Poz iz Pule. I jos jedan podatak, mi zivimo od turizma, sve drugo su zatvorili, u ovo vrijeme grad je inace prepun turista, sada imamo saku turista, kad sezona zavrsi neznam koliko familija ce nejebati....
35
Sandra Betlehem
Sandra Betlehem
1 week ago
Od početka sam sumnjala (Ja kao totalni laik) u to da je virus došao iz prirode. Odličan video. Živimo u svijetu laži i prevare.
27
Milan
Milan
1 week ago
prema statitici prosle godine je i isto vreme umrlo skoro trideset procenata manje ljudi sto se poklapa zbog depresije i slabe ekonomije bi umrlo
13
Dejan Simić
Dejan Simić
1 week ago
Sve Bog gleda i svima ce se suditi za sve lose sto su uradili ili u ovom ili u onom zivotu!!!
88
Porodica Jovanic
Porodica Jovanic
6 days ago
Jedva cekam da dodjem u Visoko i da Vas sa velikim zadovoljstvom upoznam! Stalno Vas pratim i mogu Vam samo reci jedno veliko hvala na prosvjetljenju na kom radite i nama nudite. Zivjeli! Bog Vas cuvao i svako dobro!
11
Merima Lazoric
Merima Lazoric
4 days ago
Gospodine Semire , imate moj veliki naklon , do zemlje!!!!!!!
Svaka Vam čast !!!
Ljudi otvorite oci, nedajmo da se igraju sa našim životima
Recimo ne , vakcini
Recimo ne, maskama
Recimo ne socijalnom razdvajanju
Recimo ne , njihovim zaraznim testovima
Nevjerujte ljudi ništa , ni medijima , svjetskoj zdravstvenoj organizaciji , bolnicama , doktorima
Ljudi otvorite oci !!!!!!
4
Daria Tomic
Daria Tomic
1 week ago
Corona Virus je samo paravan i priprema za paljenje 5g. Zato je cijela ova zbrka sa 1,5 metara i maskama. Ovdje se radi o paljenje 5 g mreža koje će okinuti ljude. Zašto i kako? Paljenje elektromagnetskih valova od 60-90ghz lajicki rečeno udara na kisik i ako ti netko dodje na blizinu, presiječe kisik i padaš na pod. Kao na početku corone u kini. Jel se sjećamo još onog padanja ljudi po ulicama? 5g mreža razvaljuje homoglobin u krvi, zato ti skrivaju iza corone koja je već dugo tu. Vojska stoji iza ovog i nema prepreke. 5 g je oružje. Cijepivo će biti RNA tj. S njim će nam mijenjati DNA a to je sve da možemo živjeti pod 5g mrežom. Vidjet će te u zimu. Ljudi će umirati 100% ali ne fejk. Do sada je sve bilo fejk jer nas pripremaju. Bill Gates je rekao, da smo kod ovog virusa imali sreće ali da će slijedeći biti smrtonosan. A od kud on to zna? Pripremljena je pogibija jako puno populacije i bit će tako. Vidjet ćemo da će Bill Gates biti filantrop. Ispast će svetac.
https://youtu.be/-Tcc96a-9Xc
46
Lidija Tomasevic
Lidija Tomasevic
1 week ago
Dragi Semire hvala vam na istini koju nesebicno delite🥰🥰🥰
22
Enes Dzolota
Enes Dzolota
1 week ago
Naj tacnije vijesti sto sam sluso doktore legendo
19
kasniii
kasniii
1 week ago
Hvala Semire
25
Spaceship Zemlja
Spaceship Zemlja
1 week ago (edited)
Hvala puno na videu! Virus je projekat i kojekave lazi se svaljuju na Kinu koja je dio igre Izraela tj khazara i ostale mafije. Sve su nam prikazali na olimpijskim igrama u Londonu 2012. Ta predstava sve govori sta su planirali. Najstrasnije je da su djeca bila najveci glumci u toj predstavi, tako da drugi val moze bas biti u vrijeme kad otvore skole i puste neki novi virus :S
Mislim da nacionalni sud koji predlaze Dr. Osmanagic ne bih bas mogao se organizovati u srcu porijekla mase vladara svijeta u Ukraini - laznih jevreja Khazara .......
Treba procackati jos bolje i tvz. “spansku gripu” jer i ta pandemija sigurno nije bila slucajna. Mnogi su dokazi da su ljudi poumirali od njihove vakcine spasa a ne virusa.
Bilo je vise talasa bas kao i sada. Sve rade po istom sablonu.
Tijana se već 17 dana bori sa koronom: Ovaj simptom joj je pomogao da shvati da ima upalu pluća
Korona virus je nepredvidiv, progresivno nastupa i napada respiratorne organe, a koliko je važno pratiti apsolutno svaki simptom dokazuje priča Tijane N. (38) iz Čačka koja je za "Telegraf" opisala kako je njeno iskustvo sa Covid-19 bolešću.
Prvi simptom, kao i od većine ljudi obolelih od Covid-19, bila je grzonica, a Tijana otkriva da je dve noći imala povišenu temperaturu, a zatim je naredna četiri dana bila afrebilna.
- U večernjim časovima odjednom sam osetila jezu, osećaj hladnoće na rukama, uprkos činjenici da je napolju bilo toplo. Potom sam izmerila temperaturu koja je bila oko 37,3, legla sam u krevet jer je i dalje postojao subjektivni osećaj hladnoće, kroz 10, 15 minuta temperatura je bila 37,8. Osetila sam slabost i malaksalost, koja se javila i sledeće noći uz povišenu temperaturu. Narednih četiri dana sam bila afrebilna (bez povišene temperature), samo osećaj blage malaksalosti, a uz pomoć PCR testa sam ustanovila da sam Covid-19 pozitivna - kazala je 38-godišnja žena u razgovoru za naš portal.
Nakon što je saznala da je pozitivna na korona virus, Tijani je stanje počelo da se pogoršava. Visoka temperatura se ponovo vratila, sa njom je legala i ustajala, i postepeno je gubila snagu i apetit.
- Po dobijanju nalaza PCR testa, narednih šest dana, u poslepodnevnim i u večernjim satima sam imala povišenu telesnu temperaturu koja nije prelazila 38 stepeni. Ponekad se temperatura javljala i u jutarnjim časovima. Pila sam paracetamol po potrebi, uzimala dosta tečnosti, međutim, apetit mi je bio smanjen, gotovo nikakav, što je dodatno uticalo na slabost jer nisam imala nimalo snage za svakodnevne aktivnosti - priča naša sagovornica.
Prošlo je šest dana od pojave prvog simptoma, a temperatura je naglo skočila. Tijana se tada po prvi put zabrinula, te je odmah otišla u kovid ambulantu na dodatni pregled.
- Tog šestog dana, kada je temperatura bila blizu 39 stepeni i kada mi je bilo lošije nego prethodnih dana, u smislu jake glavobolje, opšte slabosti i malaksalosti, otišla sam u bolnicu, kovid ambulantu, gde mi je izmarena telesna temperatura i urađeni saturacija kiseonika i RTG pluća, kao i labaratorijske analize. Saturacija (S02) mi je bila uredna (98 procenata), nalaz krvi je pokazao da vrednost sedimentacije i CRP u odnosu na prethodni put su bili malo povišeni, što je išlo u prilog da postoji mogućnost razvoja upalnog procesa - objašnjava Čačanka.
foto: pixabay.com/telegraf
Skener pluća je pokazao početne promene, te je ova pacijentkinja odmah dobila antibiotsku terapiju. Kako je bilo reč o prvom stadijumu pneumonije ona nije hospitalizovana već se sve vreme lečila kod kuće.
- RTG pluća je pokazivao da na jednoj strani, levo, postoje početne promene u smislu intersticijumske upale pluća, ali s obzirom da je vrednost saturacije bila uredna nisam zadržana u bolnici već mi je propisana antibiotiska terapija (pancef 400 mg i paracetamol od 500 mg, 3 x 1) i predložena i dalje vitaminska terapija (2 x 1000 vitamina C i vitamina AD3), hepatoprotektor, kao i alfalipoijnska kiselina za imunitet - rekla je Tijana.
Srećom, ona je uspela da zaustavi dalji napad opakog virusa zahvaljujući pravovremenoj reakciji i odgovornom pristupu lečenju.
- Sada se osećam mnogo bolje i prava je sreća što sam na vreme otišla i ponovo snimila pluća kako bih dobila antibiotsku terapiju jer postoji mogućnost da bi se bez iste bolest pogoršala. Isto tako, savet lekara o unosu tečnosti i nepreskakanje vitaminske terapije je pomogao da se bolest polako zaustavlja. S obzirom na to da se Covid-19 razvija kod svakog individualno, moj savet je da se strogo prate simptomi i da se ne shvata olako blago povišena temperatura niti bilo koji drugi simptom - zaključuje Tijana N. iz Čačka u razgovoru za "Telegraf".
U trenutku nastanka ovog intervjua sa Tijanom prošao je 17. dan od pojave prvog simptoma bolesti.
(Kristina Milošev/Telegraf.rs)
Ja to godinama uzimam, ali ne ispirati grlo sa sirćetom. Ima boljih metoda. Recimo H2O2 koji je efikasan protiv virusa. Svako pravi sebi kombinaciju ako hoce , na osnovu preporuka .. neko sirce , neko sodu bikarbonu , neko H2O2 .. neko prokuvanu slanu vodu .. toaleta nosa , grla ujutru , uvece , po dolasku u kucu .. bolje korigovati ishranu nego uzimati tablete . Inače nema potrebe gurati selenium suplemente. Jedan brazilski orah dnevno ima dovoljno seleniuma. Isto važi i za ostalo navedeno osim D3 koji treba suplementirati....
A pregnancy test is 99% accurate. The coronavirus spectrum test kit is 20% accurate or worse. If a test is only 20% accurate, is the better word “inaccurate”? https://revealingfraud.com/2020/03/health/test-kits-do-not-work/
A pregnancy test is 99% accurate. The coronavirus spectrum test kit is 20% accurate or worse. If a test is only 20% accurate, is the better word “inaccurate”?
Please take about 1 minute to at least glance at the bold copy. My prior article got 30,000+ views and was criticized for my commentary. Here is my limited comments: The CDC and FDA both admit the COVID19 test kits suffer from false positives and false negatives. They just fail to tell you those rates. But others have revealed those rates. “the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%” and 85% false negative rate. The test kits don’t work. If the test kits don’t work, or are less reliable than a coin flip, then all the data on “who has it” is utterly meaningless and it’s all a total fraud and hoax. People are still dying, but from the same illness as always: the flu. So, what follows is only exact quotes from the articles, and links. Below are 15 sources giving commentary on the reliability of the COVID19 test kits in use.
From the maker of the test: “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit (CD019RT)
Regulatory status: For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.” https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/sars-cov-2-coronavirus-multiplex-rt-qpcr-kit-277854-457.htm
“The New York SARS-CoV-2 Real-time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel has been designed to minimize the likelihood of false positive test results. However, in the event of a false positive result, risks to patients could include the following: a recommendation for isolation of the patient, monitoring of household or other close contacts for symptoms, patient isolation that might limit contact with family or friends and may increase contact with other potentially COVID-19 patients, limits in the ability to work…”
https://www.fda.gov/media/135662/download
CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only… “Positive results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. ”
“Negative results do not preclude 2019-nCoV infection”
“Inadequate or inappropriate specimen collection, storage, and transport are likely to yield false test results.”
“The possibility of a false negative result should especially be considered if the patient’s recent exposures or clinical presentation suggest that 2019-nCoV infection is possible, and diagnostic tests for other causes of illness (e.g., other respiratory illness) are negative. If 2019-nCoV infection is still suspected, re-testing should be considered in consultation with public health authorities. “
” Positive and negative predictive values are highly dependent on prevalence. False negative test results are more likely when prevalence of disease is high. False positive test results are more likely when prevalence is moderate to low. “
https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
“Should I be testing all patients for COVID-19?
Clinicians should base their decisions on whether a patient should be tested for COVID-19 on:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/tool-virus-requests.html
[Potential False-Positive Rate Among the ‘Asymptomatic Infected Individuals’ in Close Contacts of COVID-19 Patients]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32133832/
“Results: When the infection rate of the close contacts and the sensitivity and specificity of reported results were taken as the point estimates, the positive predictive value of the active screening was only 19.67%, in contrast, the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%. The multivariate-probabilistic sensitivity analysis results supported the base-case findings, with a 75% probability for the false-positive rate of positive results over 47%. Conclusions: In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals’ reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives. “
[Potential false-positive rate among the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals‘ in close contacts of COVID-19 patients].
—–
“Nearly 10 percent of the human genome is made of bits of virus DNA. For the most part, this viral DNA is not harmful. In some cases, scientists are finding, it actually has a beneficial impact.”
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/11/161128151050.htm
—–
“For context, Goodman says a “really good” r-squared, in terms of public health data, would be a 0.7. “Anything like 0.99,” she said, “would make me think that someone is simulating data. It would mean you already know what is going to happen.”” https://www.barrons.com/articles/chinas-economic-data-have-always-raised-questions-its-coronavirus-numbers-do-too-51581622840
—–
” There’s no evidence the PCR test is even being used at all! “
“PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.
The problem is the test is known not to work.
It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analysed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.
Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.
The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.”
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/blog/coronavirus-hoax-jan-2020
“The Test is Not Binary
Tests for infections are usually reported as positive or negative (sometimes ‘reactive’ and ‘unreactive’. One of the reasons for this is that, in many cases, multiple tests are required, and it is common to conclude that someone is infected with some negative tests and that someone is uninfected with some positive tests. The results of a complex multi-test algorithm are also usually reported as positive or negative, but interpreted by doctors and patients as infected or uninfected.
” But, in reality even individual tests are not binary, not positive or negative, but a range of numbers that are arbitrarily divided into positive on one side and negative on the other. Possibly there is a grey area that allows other factors, including the bias of the doctor or laboratory, to enter into the interpretation, or that will require further testing. “
“Positive to Negative and Back Again
The majority of the 18 patients had a positive test, followed by a negative test, followed by a positive test. Some had this several times.
If a negative test means uninfected, then this is impossible. You cannot rid yourself of the virus, and then be reinfected the next day, and then infected the day after and uninfected again.
The simplest answer to this conundrum is that negative tests do not mean uninfected. But the corollary is that positive tests do not mean infected. Which would make the test worthless.”
https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/does-2019-coronavirus-exist
Stanford epidemiologist warns that coronavirus crackdown is based on bad data
“If we had not known about a new virus out there, and had not checked individuals with PCR [virus] tests, the number of total deaths due to ‘influenza-like illness’ would not seem unusual this year.“
“Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 [COVID-19] are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes.” [That’s ascertainment bias, confirmed above where the CDC says to only test sick people.]
I am an epidemiologist and health services researcher, one with particular expertise and experience in public health emergency preparedness. I have been saying the same thing as John – I spoke for about 45 minutes last week with a reporter from ProPublica, trying to explain the concept of ascertainment bias and why the case fatality rates being tossed about were horribly exaggerated. Frankly, the real impact from a health standpoint in the US was likely to be no worse than the 1956 or 1968 influenza epidemics, even without the extreme measures. In fact, we are reaching a point where the long-term damage from the panic-driven response may well be worse than the impact of the disease.
Epidemiology is the study and analysis of the distribution (who, when, and where), patterns and determinants of health and disease conditions in defined populations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology
VirusGuy:
Some notes on those test kits I saw you asking about on Twitter yesterday.
They don’t do antibody tests. They do a thing called PCR testing, which basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.
The problem is the test is known to be bullshit.
It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analysed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also
be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.
Secondly, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.
All these
Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals do at best is tell the analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge
family of coronavirus. But that’s all.
The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like covi-19 is utter bullshit.
And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.
If you remember the PCR works by amplifying
minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have.
And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Like I said, everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system
at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if a osteogenesis is present in
sufficient quantities to sicken you.
If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all invo
lved in your sickness. Leading to false diagnosis.
And coronavirus are incredibly common.
A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.
Do you see where this is going yet?
If you want to create a totally false panic about
a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.
They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi even if you’re
doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common.
There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.
All you need to do is select the sickest of these
in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a corona virus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.
Since you already selected
the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die.
You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’,
which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.
Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something
new that doesn’t actually exist.
Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.
Your only problem is going to be that –
due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people you are mislabelling – your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.
But you
can stop people
pointing this out in several ways.
1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.
2. You can tell people
that ‘minimising’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.
3. You can talk bullshittery about r0 numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience
4. You can start testing well people (who of course
will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptomless cases
you have the less deadly is your pathogen
Take these simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks.
But why are you doing this people may ask.
Lots of reasons. Fear is useful. And a population
frightened into demanding protection will accept anything you do to ‘protect’ them, up to and including nailing them into their own houses.
It can be a trial run for social control methods. To see how gullible populations are. To enforce more
rigorous censorship. To inure people to shortage and uncertainty.
All these things and others are reasons.
But getting hung up on possible motive misses the point – that all the evidence points to this being the case.
Everything I am seeing
points at a fake manufactured pandemic. The low numbers and attempts to inflate them with scary anecdotes and bad science, the crazy overreaction in world governments, as if the reaction itself is the point. The ridiculous numbers of famous people ‘testing
positive’.
It could easily be done and it looks as if it is. In my view. But you must make up your own mind.
I think many in the virology and epidemiology line would agree, but no one is going to risk their career right now saying so in public.
They might as well jump off of a brid
ge.
You can verify everything I have said about the PCR test.
Reported case fatality rates, like the official 3.4% rate from the World Health Organization, cause horror — and are meaningless. Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes.
“The accuracy of the current COVID-19 tests is not precisely known.”
The accuracy of COVID-19 tests
RICHARD L. HUTCHISON, MD | CONDITIONS | MARCH 12, 2020
https://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2020/03/the-accuracy-of-covid-19-tests.html
” As a physician, I treat the results of lab tests like I treat movie recommendations from a friend – I am always skeptical. “
“My friend’s movie judgments are occasionally biased and off-kilter. In the same way, medical diagnostic test results are not perfect. There is always the chance that they provide incorrect information.
Medical professionals, policymakers, and members of the general public may overestimate the accuracy of diagnostic tests. The usefulness of any test depends on how likely the patient has the disease, the ability of the test to correctly identify the disease, and the capability of the test to correctly confirm the condition is not present. Unfortunately, test results will be negative for some people that actually have the disease, and some people without the disease will have positive tests.”
“ The accuracy of the current COVID-19 tests is not precisely known. Reasonable estimates, based on test performance in China and the performance of the influenza tests, are that the tests will correctly identify around 60 percent of the patients with the disease and correctly identify 90 percent of the patients that are disease-free. “
” Assume that the physician thinks there is a 50 percent of the patient having COVID-19. Given the above numbers, if the patient has the disease, the test will be positive 85 percent of the time. Fifteen percent of the infected patients will incorrectly be diagnosed as not having the disease. If the patient does not have the disease, only 70 percent of the patients will have a negative test. It would take four consecutive negative tests to conclusively prove the patient did not have the disease. “
“There has been the worry of how effective the tests for the coronavirus has been as of late. There are numerous talks in several countries that suggest people are having over six negative results before finally being diagnosed as positive for the virus.
The question of the effectiveness of the tests because the officials in Hubei province, China, have started to COUNT people with symptoms rather than using the tests to confirm that they indeed have the coronavirus.”
“First, the prevailing diagnostic test for COVID-19 may be only 30 to 40 percent accurate.” https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/lew-olowski-coronavirus-worse-than-reported-heres-how-china-is-making-the-situation-worse
—–
Please share this article with the White House:
The same entities who are behind the whole COVID-19 spinout, are also in control of testing and research, they only need to satisfy public perception that science is supreme and since they also control media, this is an easy spin too,
Jason Hommelsays:
From the data above, there are two clear problems.
The false negative rate is up to 6/7 cases. 6/7 = 85.7%.
Another source says the false positive rate is up to 80.33%.
Jason Earl Hommelsays:
Jason Hommelsays:
Germany’s low coronavirus mortality rate intrigues experts
Some query data methodology while others say high testing rates are giving more accurate picture
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/22/germany-low-coronavirus-mortality-rate-puzzles-experts
Right. The more “non deathly ill” people you test, and with a test that gives a lot of false positives, you have a lower death rate. The virus is not spreading, they are simply detecting more false positives among the generally healthy population.
Jason Hommelsays:
They DELETED Germany from the list of nations at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_testing likely because Germany’s results expose the fraud.
Jason Hommelsays:
Dr. Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health — widely regarded as the most experienced and respected expert serving on the president’s coronavirus task force — said post blank in a January 31 briefing,: “We don’t know the accuracy of this test.” Commenting on the availability of test kits for other viruses that are confirmed to be 100 percent accurate, Fauci lamented: “That’s not even near what we have right now” for the coronavirus. https://komonews.com/news/coronavirus/exclusive-former-hhs-official-claims-cdc-leaders-lied-to-trump-over-coronavirus-testing
Jason Hommelsays:
This is an interesting article. But how much exactly of this virus is needed to make an accurate diagnoses. What is in the news is not really what is reflected out on the streets apart from people that are being terrorized. It is more like a test of conformity all over again totally unethical.
Jason Hommelsays:
The test kits are said to have a process where they grow the virus and double it like 20-40 times. So, the tests kits do not measure how much viral load there was to begin with, because they exponentially grow it. This is part of the problem.
Jason Hommelsays:
Test results may be inconclusive for several reasons, according to the expert virologists and the CDC.
There’s the possibility of simple technical errors, such as improper collection, handling or shipping. Or the test’s reagents (key chemical components of the kit) may be flawed, creating diagnostic inaccuracy.
It’s possible that the patient who tested negative, then later positive, is carrying levels of the virus that are so low they’re below the threshold of detection.
“Viral load goes up and down,” said Dr. Charles Chiu, director of UC San Francisco’s Viral Diagnostics and Discovery Center. “That’s the natural course of the disease. You can test a patient and they’ll be positive one day and negative the next day.”
There’s another possibility: If the patient isn’t showing symptoms, they may not have coughed up enough of the virus from their lungs into their upper respiratory tract, where test samples are taken.
It’s also possible the test can’t detect some strains of the virus, according to the CDC. RNA viruses like the COVID-19 pathogen have a lot of genetic variability. Although efforts were made to design test assays that target the parts of the
viral genome that are shared by all strains, said the CDC, there might be a mismatch.
“We don’t have a test that can definitely say someone is not infected,” said Dr. John Swartzberg, a specialist in infectious disease and clinical professor
emeritus at UC Berkeley’s School of Public Health.
“We know by the time symptoms appear, we will find it,” he added. “And we also know in a small number we can find it before symptoms. We don’t know how long before.
“We are asking more of the test than it can give us,” he said.
Jason Hommelsays:
When I asked an epidemiologist pointed questions, like how to tell the difference between an “asymptomatic carrier” (no symptoms, tests positive) and a “false positive” (no symptoms, tests positive), things got really interesting.
A.R.L.says:
Spot on, we know what’s happening here, besides the super huge hoax of shutting the economy down so they can crash the dollar and chip everyone to bring in NWO and control the hell out of everyone, you found a huge hole in the statistics, once again revealing fraud. Exceptional research and common sense. Hope all is well, we are here now. We knew it was coming and how grievous a time. To watch this play out is surreal, yet we were born for such a time as this. The blood of Jesus betwixt us and cover our sins. Keep us and our families. Gods will be done.
Jason Hommelsays:
I started thinking about this. Hmmm… How can they distinguish between one coronavirus and another, especially if these are responsible for the common cold? Turns out, they really can’t.
A.R.L.says:
You have always had the knack to see the obvious that hides in plain sight from the rest of us. Mass hypnosis of the population has occurred to blind us from seeing the trees through the forest. Quite the gift. I appreciated coming to this page and feeling so comforted knowing there are others who know what’s going on, makes you feel less crazy in a world full of zombies of the matrix.
Jason Hommelsays:
Thank you. See this article:
https://revealingfraud.com/2020/03/health/35-sources-the-covid19-corona-virus-is-over-hyped-and-likely-fraud/
A.R.L.says:
The government should hire you as an analyst. I am skimming the article, will take hours to read, curious how long it took you to compile and put together. And ahead of the curve in early March. I’m going to dive into it.
Jason Hommelsays:
Thank you. Put in a good recommendation for me. HAHA!
A.R.L.says:
It’s a case of “Catch me if you Can”…Leonardo DiCaprio…story line, he went around breaking all the rules but he was so good at it, the Government wanted him as an ally instead of a formidable foe. So, that may end up being presented to you by fate. Would be a big decision.
Dumisani Madalanesays:
What an eye opening article !!! Who will have the guts to reveal the “untold truth”?
John Blaidsays:
I have written this article that exposes the various inconvenient facts surrounding this unfounded and unjustified lockdown and hysteria. Please read it.
Jason Hommelsays:
I finally found [mis]information about the
subject of the test kits not working in a semi mainstream news source, the guardian. Here is the article:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/27/report-coronavirus-quack-cures-immediately-says-uk-government
Here is their one single unsourced sentence on the subject:
“Another example of fake information came from one influential YouTube vlogger who told his followers incorrectly that coronavirus tests did not work and advised drinking hot water and taking hot baths to kill the virus.”
Of course, they don’t list any source saying that the test kits work. And they claim only one source is saying that the test kits don’t work.
In stark contrast to their horrific non-journalistic standards, I have over 15 sources saying the test kits do not work, including the CDC, the FDA, Dr. Fouci, two epidemiologists (one from Stanford University), and MD, and the TEST MAKER THEMSELVES!
Guardian, you are hereby debunked as not only fake news, but purposeful liars, slanderers, disinformation agents, and enemies of humanity.
Jason Hommelsays:
What is especially repugnant about the guardian is their statement to trust the UK government, here: “People are also being asked to share the official medical advice produced by the NHS and UK government, as well as posts promoting good causes.”
It appears the guardian is too ignorant to know that their script
is broken. Their article came out March 26th. The UK government said, “As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) in the UK.”
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid
And this remains their official statement as of March 30th.
Moderatorsays:
“osteogenesis”??
The word
that shows that this article is fake is OSTEOGENESIS
The definition of Osteogenesis – a noun – = “formation of new bone”.
Now read the relevant paragraph below and it is clear that this load of dross has no place on the web.
“For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if a osteogenesis is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.”
The author is spreading fake
information that is harmful to the reader, and the author knows NOTHING about medicine or science
Jason Hommelsays:
That word is probably just a typo. It happens. Because, I agree, in context, it’s nonsense. That does not mean his entire point is nonsense, nor is the entire article of 14 other sources. Try refuting several of that author’s main points, rather than refuting a point that has no point. And if you know so much, what word should be there, in place of osteogenesis?
Jason Earl Hommelsays:
Jason+Hommelsays:
Comments are closed.
Search for:
Istina o PCR testu izumitelja i drugih stručnjaka
-
Naučnik koji je izumio testni komplet PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) bio je Kary B. Mullis. Ova tehnologija se danas koristi za testiranje takozvanog koronavirusa za koji se smatra da je uzrok bolesti koju zdravstvene vlasti kao što su Svjetske zdravstvene organizacije (SZO) nejasno i nedosljedno definiraju ili identificiraju. Mullis je među mnogim naučnicima koji hrabro dovode u pitanje pripovijesti o hipotezi o HIV-u i AIDS-u. Mullis nije vjerovao što nauka tvrdi da retrovirus HIV-a uzrokuje AIDS bolest. Bio je važan član „Grupe za preispitivanje hipoteze HIV-AIDS-a, 500-člane protestne organizacije koja je tražila ponovno ispitivanje uzroka AIDS-a“. Prema njemu u svom Spin intervjuu iz 1992. god. „PCR je olakšao uvid u to da su određene osobe zaražene HIV-om, a neki od njih su se potukli sa simptomima AIDS-a. Ali to ne počinje čak ni da odgovorim na pitanje: “Da li ga HIV izaziva?”
“Početkom 1990-ih PCR je počeo da se koristi i Kary Mullis je 1993. dobio Nobelovu nagradu. PCR je, jednostavnije rečeno, termički biciklistički metod koji se koristi za izradu do milijarde kopija određenog DNK uzorka, čineći ga dovoljno velikim za proučavanje. PCR je nezamjenjiva tehnika sa širokim rasponom primjena, uključujući biomedicinska istraživanja i kriminalističku forenziku. “
Prema samom Mullisu, PCR ne može biti u potpunosti i nikada se ne bi trebao koristiti kao alat u “dijagnostici infektivnih bolesti.” To je glavni razlog zašto se Mullis nije složio sa naučnicima koji stoje iza hipoteze o HIV-AIDS-u. Prkosio je glavnoj ideji da su „mehanizmi HIV-a koji uzrokuju bolest jednostavno previše“ misteriozni “da bi ih shvatili. Prema njegovim riječima, „misterija tog prokletog virusa generirana je od dvije milijarde dolara godišnje koje potroše na to. Uzmete bilo koji drugi virus, a potrošite dvije milijarde dolara i o njemu također možete izmisliti neke velike misterije. ” Takođe je dodao da su „ljudska bića puna retrovirusa. Ne znamo je li to stotine ili hiljade ili stotine hiljada. Tek smo ih nedavno počeli tražiti. Ali nikada ranije nikoga nisu ubili. Ljudi su uvijek preživjeli retroviruse. ”
S obzirom na trenutnu krizu coronavirusa, za koju su neki vjerovali da je varljivo proizvedena i napravljena, situacija oko pojave HIV-AIDS-a o kojoj Kary Mullis odlučuje nije daleko ili drugačija. Međutim, reakcija vlasti danas je globalno oštrija dok je također tragično smrtonosna jer postavljaju politike i protokole koji očito krše ustavna prava građanina, a istovremeno uništavaju ekonomiju, čineći život jadnim i težim za obične ljude, čak i nekoliko policajaca širom SAD-a, na primjer, reagovali su i žalili se.
Da bismo saznali više o tome zašto se ova kriza smešno zasniva na neispravnoj „nauci“, čujemo šta drugi stručnjaci kažu o testiranju na koronavirus.
Prema Jason Hommel-u, plodan pisac i istraživač, a ujedno i autor vrlo važnog članka koji se odnosi na testiranje na coronavirus pod nazivom „Naučnici kažu da testni setovi COVID19 ne rade, nisu vrijedni i daju nemoguće rezultate“:
„PCR u osnovi uzima uzorak vaših ćelija i pojačava bilo koju DNK da bi se tražile„ virusne sekvence “, tj. Delovi DNK nečoveka koji izgleda da odgovaraju delovima poznatog virusnog genoma. Problem je što test zna da ne funkcionira . Koristi ‘pojačavanje’ što znači uzimanje vrlo malene količine DNK i eksponencijalno ga uzgajanje dok se ne može analizirati. Očito će se svake minutne kontaminacije u uzorku također pojačati što će dovesti do potencijalno velikih pogrešaka u otkrivanju. Uz to, traži se samo djelomična virusna sekvencija, a ne cijeli genomi, tako da je identificiranje jednog patogena gotovo nemoguće čak i ako zanemarite ostale probleme. Ideja da ovi setovi mogu izolovati određeni virus poput COVID-19 nije glupost . “
U međuvremenu, prema Celia Farber, autorici „Ozbiljni neželjeni događaji: Necenzurirana istorija AIDS-a“ i istraživačici čiji je rad o socijalizmu, farmaceutskoj industriji, manipulaciji masovnim medijima i, posebno, temi HIV-AIDS-a učinio da stekne nagrada za istraživačko novinarstvo. Ona je i urednica Istine o barijeri, istraživačke i književne veb stranice i suorganizatorica „Newslist-a zviždača“ s Kristinom Borjesson na PRN-u:
„Jedna od bezbrojnih misterija koje se okreću glavom u čitavoj koronskoj situaciji bila je pojava poznatih ljudi, od Toma Hanksa i njegove supruge, do Sophie Trudeau, do princa Charlesa koji je objavio da su„ pozitivno testirani “na COVID-19 i da su bili samopouzdanje -varantovanje. U svim tim slučajevima poznati-moćnih ljudi simptomi su ili nepostojeći ili blagi. Zašto, neko se zapitao, jesu li napravili takvo sijeno zbog toga? Činilo se da je britanski Royals u ovom slučaju proturječio njihovom etosu tajnosti. Pa šta je to značilo? Nagovijestio je, ako ništa drugo, da COVID-19 nije sve tako smrtonosno. Da virus može biti prisutan bez uzrokovanja bolesti. Važni su faktori domaćina. A to što je „pozitivno“ za COVID-19 nije ni PR smrtna kazna niti stvarna smrtna kazna. Možda u njihovom elitnom i ezoterijskom jeziku znači neku prestiž, ili sakrament paganskoga božanskog virusa. Ko zna? U slučaju Trudeau, Sophie je testirala pozitivno i imala simptome, dok njen suprug Justin, premijer, nikada se nije razbolio i nikada nije testiran. (Nije hteo da izgleda privilegovano; neće se svi testirati u Kanadi, morate imati simptome.) “
S druge strane, iz članka takođe Celia Farber, David Crowe, „kanadskog istraživača sa diplomom biologije i matematike i domaćina podcastova„ Zarazni mit “, takođe predsednika istraživačkog centra Rethinking AIDS, takođe jasno objasnio je probleme sa testiranjem koronavirusa zasnovanim na PCR, “otkrivajući svet nezamislive složenosti, kao i lukavstvo” :
“Prvo što treba znati je da test nije binarni. U stvari, mislim da ne postoje testovi za zarazne bolesti koji su pozitivni ili negativni. Ono što oni rade je da uzimaju nekakav kontinuitet i oni proizvoljno kažu da je ta poanta razlika između pozitivnog i negativnog. “
Nastavio je:
„PCR je zaista proizvodna tehnika. Počinjete sa jednom molekulom. Počinjete s malom količinom DNK i u svakom ciklusu količina se udvostručuje, što ne zvuči tako mnogo, ali ako dvostruko udvostručite 30 puta, dobijete otprilike milijardu puta više materijala nego što ste započeli. Kao tehnika izrade, to je sjajno. Ono što rade je da prikažu fluorescentni molekul u RNK dok ga proizvode. Sjajite svjetlo na jednoj talasnoj dužini i dobit ćete odgovor, svjetlost vam se šalje na različitoj talasnoj dužini. Dakle, oni mjere količinu svjetlosti koja se vraća i to je njihov surogat za koliko DNK postoji. Koristim riječ DNK. Tu je korak u RT-PCR testu gde pretvorite RNA u DNK. Dakle, PCR test zapravo ne koristi virusnu RNA. Koristi DNK, ali to je poput besplatne RNA. Pa logično da je to ista stvar, ali može biti zbunjujuća. Kao zašto ja iznenada govorim o DNK? U osnovi, postoji određeni broj ciklusa. “
Što se tiče namjere Karya Mullisa za PCR, ovo je rekao:
„Tužan sam što nije ovdje da brani svoju tehniku izrade. Kary nije izmislio test. Izumio je vrlo moćnu tehniku izrade kojom se zloupotrebljava. Koje su najbolje aplikacije za PCR? Nije medicinska dijagnostika. Znao je to i uvijek je to govorio. “
Nastavio je da kaže:
„Mislim da ne razumiju šta rade; Mislim da je van kontrole. Ne znaju kako da ovo završe. To je ono što mislim da se dogodilo: Oni su gradili mašinu za pandemiju dugi niz godina i, kao što znate, bila je vježba za pandemiju mnogo prije nego što je sve to počelo. “
U međuvremenu, također iz razgovora Celia Farber, dr. David Rasnick, biohemičar, programer proteaze i bivši osnivač EM laboratorija pod nazivom Viral Forensics, izjavio je:
„Morate imati ogromnu količinu bilo kojeg organizma da biste izazvali simptome. Ogromne količine. Ne započinjete s testiranjem; započinješ sa osluškivanjem pluća. Skeptičan sam što je test za PRC uvijek istinit. To je sjajno naučno istraživačko sredstvo. To je užasno sredstvo za kliničku medicinu. 30% zaraženih ćelija ubijeno je prije nego što pokažete simptome. Do trenutka kada pokažete simptome … mrtve ćelije generiraju simptome “
Na pitanje Farbera koji je njegov savjet osobama koje žele biti testirane na COVID-19, odgovorio je:
„Ne čini to, kažem, kad me ljudi pitaju. Nijedna zdrava osoba ne treba biti testirana. To ne znači ništa, ali može vam uništiti život, učiniti vas apsolutno jadnima. Svaki put kad netko uzme bris, uzorak tkiva svog DNK, to pređe u vladinu bazu podataka. To je da nas prate. Oni ne traže samo virus. Molimo, stavite to u svoj članak. “
Dodao je:
„PCR za dijagnozu je veliki problem. Kad to morate uvećati, to će stvoriti ogromne količine lažnih pozitivnih rezultata. Ponovo sam skeptičan da je PCR test ikad istinit. “
Da biste razumjeli više o PCR-u, predlažemo vam da pročitate više o članku Celia Farber ovdje:
Više referenci:
About 13,100 results (0.40 seconds)
Search Results
› watch -vidi - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usyQgPU-VrI
Apr 19, 2020 - Uploaded by CRUX
www.youtube.com › watch
May 9, 2020 - Uploaded by FACE HD TV
vidi ovu adresu - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEcHyPw4Txs
www.youtube.com › watch
May 2, 2020 - Uploaded by sixesfullofnines
Na Francuskom sa English subtitlovima - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=durcHyxpFT4
www.alo.rs › vesti › svet › vest
Apr 19, 2020 - Uploaded by L'actu Paris
www.youtube.com › watch
May 7, 2020 - Uploaded by FES TV
About 1,740,000 results (0.65 seconds)
www.youtube.com › watch
7 hours ago - New Film Exposes 1986 Act Guaranteeing Vaccine Makers' Profits ... his latest film exposing the predatory corporate takeover of the vaccine ...
www.bitchute.com › video
5 hours ago - New Film Exposes 1986 Act Guaranteeing Vaccine Makers' Profits. ... Creators are allowed to post content they produce to the platform, so long ...
www.brighteon.com › ...
New Film Exposes 1986 Act Guaranteeing Vaccine Makers' Profits ... down his latest film exposing the predatory corporate takeover of the vaccine industry to ...
www.theatlantic.com › health › archive › 2019/05 › va...
www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics
dissentwatch.com
... Roger Stone's Wife Pleads With President Trump To Pardon Him; New Film Exposes 1986 Act Guaranteeing Vaccine Makers' Profits; Quibi Squandered $2BN ...
childrenshealthdefense.org › mercury › mercury-facts
An insatiable pharmaceutical industry has 271 new vaccines under development in CDC's bureaucratic pipeline in hopes of boosting vaccine revenues to $100 ... drug makers removed most thimerosal from pediatric vaccines in 2003 is wrong. ... announce the release of his next film, “1986: The Act“, streaming online July 8, ...
kymkemp.com › 2019/11/03 › are-vaccines-really-as-safe...
Nov 3, 2019 - The New York based Tribeca Film Festival pulled the controversial documentary ... Having exposed the covert chemical, biological, psychosocial and ... Vaccines manufacturers make billions of dollars in profit each year with no ... The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 compels DHHS to take ...