KAKO PODESITI DA SE DOBIJE PREVOD YOUTUBE FILMOVA
LGBT thought police now a danger to public health
Mike Adams - OCTOBER 19, 2018
IMAGE CREDITS: ESTHER VARGAS, FLICKER.
In “progressive” America today, you’re no longer allowed to mention the scientific facts about the spread of STDs among gay men.
Twitter has just banned LifeSiteNews for daring to report the scientific facts about gay sex spreading many blood-borne diseases. Because the LGBT thought police now run all the tech giants, any fact-based reports that don’t worship anal sex as an ultra-clean lifestyle of purity and godliness are quickly banned by the tech giants.
With this bowing down to the anti-science lunacy of the LGBT propagandists, Twitter now underscores why it is a danger to the public health of all Americans. Articles that discuss infectious diseases among heterosexual couples are openly allowed, of course, because according to the LGBT cultists, straight heterosexual intercourse is “strange” and “weird.” But articles that discuss the health risks associated with anal penetrative sexual intercourse are verboten.
Science, in other words, is now deemed “hate speech” by the clueless, scientifically illiterate LGBT crusaders who spent their college years learning how to be “social justice warriors” rather than informed biologists. Fact-based reality has been overthrown by LGBT-protective tech monopolists who control all online conversations by asserting authoritarian control over thoughts and speech. They’ve unanimously decided that protecting their false narratives of “safe” anal sex are far more important than educating the public about how anal cancer is actually spread. (Hint: Primarily through anal sex, in case you haven’t figured that out yet…)
The full story from LifeSiteNews:
October 18, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Twitter has just locked LifeSiteNews out of our Twitter account over an article we posted four years ago that provided expert analysis on the rise in sexually-transmitted diseases among homosexuals.
The 2014 piece by Dr. Gerard M. Nadal, a molecular biologist and microbiologist who is also president and CEO of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer, responds to media coverage of what was at the time the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s new annual report on STDs.
Contrary to the consensus that the “reason for the documented continued rise in syphilis (primarily affecting homosexuals) has more to do with homophobia than anything else,” Dr. Nadal attributes the rise to factor such as an “upward trend in unprotected sex” and 60% of homosexual men failing to disclose their symptoms or status to sex partners.
He cited data from mainstream sources such as the CDC, a then-recent New York Times report, and a 2006 study in the journal AIDS Behavior.
On October 18, 2018, however, LifeSiteNews received the following message, notifying staff that Twitter was locking the account because the 2014 tweet sharing the story’s neutral, factual headline violated “our rules against hateful conduct,” and somehow “promote[d] violence against, threaten[ed], or harass[ed] other people on the basis of […] sexual orientation […], or serious disease.”
No further elaboration was given. A length of time for the lockout was not specified. The only recourse offered was for LifeSite to remove the tweet or start an appeal process. For the moment, LifeSite staff cannot post to or otherwise operate @LifeSitein any way.
“This total intolerance for even reporting government health dept statistics that reveal the health dangers of homosexual activity betrays what Peter Thiel, himself a homosexual, previously called a totalitarian mindset in Silicon Valley,” said Steve Jalsevac, co-founder and president of LifeSiteNews.
“Twitter is now trying to force news agencies to report only what is acceptable to their personal, biased views and shutting down balanced, factual reporting on the homosexual issue.”
“This is getting dangerous for our democracy since a free press is one of the basic and necessary foundations for a genuinely democratic society,” Jalsevac warned. “This is getting scary. It is in everyone’s interest to fight this type of action and even demand government intervention to protect our rights.”
Just the day before, former LifeSiteNews reporter and Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH.org) president Peter LaBarbera revealed at LifeSiteNewsthat Twitter had recently banned him on the same grounds, over a 2016 tweet describing homosexual acts as a “sin” that “spreads disease.”
“If Twitter no longer allows its users to advocate for healthy behaviors on its platform, and to defend their sincere moral and religious beliefs–shared by billions worldwide–then it will devolve into a bland, politically correct echo-chamber,” LaBarbera warned.
LifeSiteNews has created a petition here urging Twitter to un-block LifeSite’s account.
End of human race? Meet the sex dolls that 'will love you back' SEX dolls are going to love humans, an expert has revealed.
By Lily Waddell
/ Published 18th August 2016
"If they can get them to do the dishes, washing and ironing, I will have one."
"The world is getting so difficult for people to form relationships as it is.Men are being told by media to check their masculinity and not be so macho, but then most women want an actual testosterone laden man. This will simplify things and make women decide what they want, because a robot cant replace a good women...there are just very few of them available"
"The future of married sex."
"maybe what makes these robots attractive is the male fantasy of the woman who will meet a his every sexual desire and afterward he can throw her in a closet until the next go around. no doubt guys will get tired of bonking the same sex doll after awhile too..."
"'Sexy' robots will spell the end of mankind. Not because they will destroy us, but because males will no longer have to grow up and become men anymore. 'Sexy' robots will not get their feelings hurt if they are treated like dirt by the adult boys that own them. 'Sexy' robots will not carry STDs, will not seek out other mates to satisfy their own fantasies, will not get pregnant, and will cater to the most selfish, self-centered, deviant behavior on the parts of their owners."
"As such, women will not be able to find husbands anymore, procreation stops, and the human race ends not with a bang but with a whimper."
"X and his pals have ordered a dozen children robots for their personal use."
Published on CNS News (http://cnsnews.com)
Adults Raised by Gay Couples Speak Out Against Gay ‘Marriage’ in Federal Court
By Lauretta Brown | January 23, 2015 | 4:24 PM EST
(CNSNews.com) – Four adult children of same-sex parents have submitted amicus curiae briefs in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals asking that it oppose the legalization of same-sex “marriage."
The Court, in New Orleans, La., heard arguments on Jan. 9 as it considers whether to uphold traditional marriage – defined as being between one man and one woman -- in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.
B.N. Klein, Robert Oscar Lopez, Dawn Stefanowicz, and Katy Faust all grew up with homosexual parents. All four argued that redefining marriage to include same-sex couples would harm children by depriving them of a mother or father.
In her brief, Dawn Stefanowicz described her experience living in a same-sex household.
“I wasn’t surrounded by average heterosexual couples,” she says in her court brief. “Dad’s partners slept and ate in our home, and they took me along to meeting places in the LGBT communities. I was exposed to overt sexual activities like sodomy, nudity, pornography, group sex, sadomasochism and the ilk.”
“There was no guarantee that any of my Dad’s partners would be around for long, and yet I often had to obey them,” she said. “My rights and innocence were violated.”
“As children, we are not allowed to express our disagreement, pain and confusion,” Stefanowicz explained. “Most adult children from gay households do not feel safe or free to publicly express their stories and life-long challenges; they fear losing professional licenses, not obtaining employment in their chosen field, being cut off from some family members or losing whatever relationship they have with their gay parent(s). Some gay parents have threatened to leave no inheritance, if the children don’t accept their parent’s partner du jour.”
“I grew up with a parent and her partner[s] in an atmosphere in which gay ideology was used as a tool of repression, retribution and abuse,” B.N. Klein wrote of her experience [1] with a lesbian mother. “I have seen that children in gay households often become props to be publicly displayed to prove that gay families are just like heterosexual ones.”
Klein said she was taught that “some Jews and most Christians were stupid and hated gays and were violent,” and that homosexuals were “much more creative and artistic” because they were not repressed and were naturally more ‘feeling.’”
“At the same time I was given the message that if I did not agree (which I did not), I was stupid and damned to a life of punishing hostility from my mother and her partner,” she recounts. “They did this with the encouragement of all their gay friends in the community and they were like a cheering squad. I was only allowed out of my room to go to school. This could go on for weeks.”
“I was supposed to hate everyone based on what they thought of my mother and her partner,” said Klein. “People’s accomplishments did not matter, their personal struggles did not matter, and their own histories were of no consequence. The only thing that mattered was what they thought of gays.”
Robert Oscar Lopez [2]who was also raised by a lesbian mother and her partner, had a different experience which he described as the “best possible conditions for a child raised by a same-sex couple.”
“Had I been formally studied by same-sex parenting ‘experts’ in 1985, I would have confirmed their rosiest estimations of LGBT family life,” Lopez wrote, but then went on to argue against same-sex marriage saying that, “behind these facades of a happy ‘outcome’ lay many problems.”
He describes experiencing a great deal of sexual confusion due to the lack of a father figure in his life. He turned to a life of prostitution with older men as a teenager.
“I had an inexplicable compulsion to have sex with older males,” he recounted, saying he “wanted to have sex with older men who were my father’s age, though at the time I could scarcely understand what I was doing.”
“The money I received for sex certainly helped me financially because it allowed me certain spending money beyond what I earned with my teenage jobs at a pizzeria and in my mother’s [psychiatric] clinic,” he states in the brief. “But the money was not as impactful as the fact that I needed to feel loved and wanted by an older male figure, even if for only as short as a half hour.”
“As early as ten years ago, I developed a clear stance on homosexual relationships. A civil union or some kind of state recognition would have helped my mother and her partner,” Lopez writes.
“Yet the traditional marriage laws in New York State as they existed back then prevented my mother and her partner from entirely cutting my father out of my life,” he explained. “The latter reality proved pivotal because my re-establishment of ties to my father in 1998 led to a transition in my life, from being lost and sexually confused to being stable and romantically fulfilled.”
Katy Faust, [3]who grew up with a lesbian mother and her partner also testified against gay marriage but clarified that “my advocacy against gay marriage and for the rights of children will never include condemnation of my mother and her partner or details about their private lives.”
“When we institutionalize same-sex marriage,” Faust writes, “we move from permitting citizens the freedom to live as they choose, to promoting same-sex headed households. In doing so, we ignore the true nature of the outcropping of marriage.”
“Now we are normalizing a family structure where a child will always be deprived daily of one gender influence and the relationship with at least one natural parent,” she explains, “Our cultural narrative becomes one that, in essence, tells children that they have no right to the natural family structure or their biological parents, but that children simply exist for the satisfaction of adult desires.”
The 5th Circuit is still considering the legality of state bans on same-sex “marriage” and will issue an opinion in the coming months.
The U.S. Supreme Court announced [4]on Jan. 19 that it will consider gay “marriage” bans in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee with oral arguments in April and a ruling before the end of the current term in June.
Source URL: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/lauretta-brown/adults-raised-gay-couples-speak-out-against-gay-marriage-federal-court
https://www.rt.com/news/367069-canada-repeals-anal-sex-ban/
Published time: 16 Nov, 2016 00:50
Revelers hold a giant pride flag during the" WorldPride" gay pride Parade in Toronto, Canada. © Mark Blinch / Reuters
Canada’s Liberal government said it will repeal a section of the criminal code that effectively bans anal intercourse for 16- and 17-year-olds, which is now viewed as infringing on the rights of gays and other sexual minorities.
The measure was announced on Tuesday morning by Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould, who said that it was about time to scrap the “discriminatory” law.
“This section of the Criminal Code is discriminatory and the LGBTQ2 community has rightfully called for its repeal,” Wilson-Raybould said, as quoted by CBC News. “Our society has evolved over the last few decades
and our criminal justice system needs to evolve as well. This legislation will help ensure that the system is keeping pace with societal change and continuing to meet expectations of Canadians.”
Read more
“Diversity and inclusion have long been among the values Canadians embrace.
Canadians expect their laws and their government to reflect these values,”she added.
Under current legislation, Section 159 of the Canadian Criminal Code reads that “every person who engages in an act of anal intercourse
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years.” The exceptions are a husband and wife, and any two persons over the age of 18. Since the age of consent in Canada is otherwise 16, the law has
been accused of discriminating against homosexuals.
“A lot of Canadians think that when Pierre Trudeau said ‘the state had no business in the bedrooms of the nation’ back in the ’60s, that that meant this law was repealed,” Douglas
Elliott, a Toronto-based lawyer and gay rights activist, told the National Post. “But in fact, all they did was create an exemption — an exemption that has always discriminated against gay men.”
The Ontario Court
of Appeal ruled Section 159 unconstitutional in 1995, with Justice Rosalie Abella saying it “arbitrarily disadvantages individuals.” But the bill has remained on the books and has been continually enforced in five of Canada’s
provinces, according to a report by the LGBT charity Egale. Between 2014 and 2015, 69 people were charged under the law, although none were convicted.
However, the motion to repeal Section 159 has not been met with open arms by everyone. Gwen Landolt,
who heads the pro-family group REAL Women of Canada, said that anal and vaginal sex carry different risks and this should be reflected in the legislation.
“If you want to protect, there has got to be a prohibition somewhere,” Landolt
told the National Post.
As well as moving to repeal Section 159, the government has also appointed Randy Boissonnault, the MP for Edmonton Centre, as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's new special LGBTQ2 adviser. LGBTQ2 stands for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual,
Transgender, Queer and Two-Spirited (a kind of gender identity recognized by Native Americans). In his new role, Boissonnault will address equality and discrimination issues and is expected to apologize for past injustices.
Comments:
Green Pumpkin - Canada is prioritizing anal sex for teenagers? Will they teach how to do it to schoolchildren to get them ready for when they turn 16? That surpasses American teachers showing their class how to put a condom on a banana. Mentally ill people are increasing in the world exponentially. Surely the End is near, as it has been foretold
Published time: 16 Nov, 2016 23:53
© Mohammed Salem / Reuters
A UK tourist has been arrested and charged in Dubai for having “extramarital sex” after she reported being gang raped by two British men.
TrendsViral
The 25-year-old woman was on holiday in the United Arab Emirates when the alleged attack took place last month, according to “Detained in Dubai,” a UK-based organization that “assists people who have become victims of injustice” in the UAE.
Upon reporting the rape to local police, the woman was allegedly arrested for breaking Emirati law against extramarital sex, and faces years in prison or severe physical punishment, including flogging and stoning to death, if convicted.
Read more
The unidentified woman’s passport was confiscated by authorities before she was released on bail, while her alleged attackers have since flown home to Birmingham, according to The Sun, which reportedly spoke to a family friend of the victim.
The charges have been confirmed by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, says Detained in Dubai, who reiterated that “if the facts bear it out, [the case] deserves the utmost concern.”
"The UAE has a long history of penalizing rape victims," says Radha Stirling, founder and director of Detained in Dubai.
"Police regularly fail to differentiate between consensual intercourse and violent rape. Victims go to them expecting justice, and end up being prosecuted,” Stirling added.
“They not only invalidate their victimization, they actually punish them for it."
READ MORE: Two Saudi women jailed for driving freed from prison
All sex outside of marriage is illegal in the UAE, “irrespective of any relationship you may have with your partner in the UK” according to the British government’s foreign travel advice for the UAE.
“It’s against the law to live together, or to share the same hotel room, with someone of the opposite sex to whom you aren’t married or closely related,” reads the advice before warning that tourists “run the risk of prosecution, imprisonment and/or a fine and deportation” if they’re a found to have broken the law.
https://www.rt.com/usa/367047-ohio-attorney-assault-hypnotize/
Published time: 15 Nov, 2016 17:59Edited time: 16 Nov, 2016 10:50
© Court Chatter View / YouTube
An Ohio attorney who induced clients into a hypnotic trance before sexually assaulting them has been jailed for 12 years.
TrendsViral
Prosecutors in Lorain County said 59-year-old Michael Fine had, under the guise of providing legal assistance, carried out a spate of attacks on women for his own sexual pleasure by using hypnosis on his victims.
The father-of-two’s crimes were exposed only when a client became suspicious and began recording her conversations with Fine. The extent of his manipulation later became apparent when one of his victims secretly videod a meeting at his office as part of a police sting, reports NBC4I news.
READ MORE: Fagin’ it: Thief pickpockets shopkeeper using ‘hypnosis’
The attorney was sentenced to 12 years in prison at a Lorain County court on Monday, two months after he plead guilty to sexually-motivated kidnapping and attempted kidnapping, report The Chronicle Telegram.
Judge Patricia A. Cosgrove said Fine had used relaxation techniques to hypnotize, abuse people and “take their dignity.”
Prior to sentencing, Fine said he had “remorse and grief in my heart.”
In a victim impact statement, one of Fine’s former clients described how he preyed on her vulnerability.
“I went to Michael Fine with help in getting out of a terrible and abusive situation. I paid him to help me. He used my trust and his position as my attorney to gain information about my vulnerabilities,” she told the court.
“He then used that information not only to protect and defend me, but also to manipulate, hurt and take advantage of me,” the woman added, according to the The Chronicle Telegram.
Upon his release, Fine will have to sign on to the sex offenders register for at least 25 years. The 59-year-old’s law license has been permanently revoked.
https://www.rt.com/uk/211895-uk-shop-hypnotist-robbery/
Fagin’ it: Thief pickpockets shopkeeper using ‘hypnosis’
Published time: 5 Dec, 2014 17:07
image by metropolitan police
British police have released CCTV footage purportedly showing a man robbing a local store using hypnosis, a method that has shocked even the most seasoned officers.
TagsConflict, UK, Hate crimes, Human rights, Internet, Education
In the video, an unidentified man is shown “hypnotizing”shop owner Aftab Haider, 56, who owns the Hops and Pops shop in Highgate, north London.
The man somehow confuses Haider, before stealing “thousands of pounds” worth of cash from his pockets – the day’s takings.
According to police, the suspect may be Eastern European, and is shown wearing a black bomber jacket.
Scotland Yard said the incident took place at around 9.45pm on September 11.
“We had no idea Aziz had been hypnotized. When he told me what happened I just thought, ‘How could he have just let someone hug him and start going through his pockets?” a friend of Haider told the London Evening Standard.
“He had hundreds of pounds stolen from him. It’s worrying if people can do that, other people might do the same.”
The “hypnotism” act seems to be similar to those carried out by street magicians, and is usually shown in TV programs or live magic shows. Magicians such as Derren Brown conducted similar tricks in 2006, where he hypnotized four city workers to carry out a pretend “£100,000 heist” on a bank security guard.
However, there is no recorded case in recent times of such a technique being deployed in a corner shop robbery.
“The victim remained motionless and unable to stop the robbery taking place. He said that he was momentarily unaware of what had happened to him,” said Detective Sergeant Dave Bullock.
“The suspect’s distraction tactics appeared to have worked as he robbed the victim of cash from his pocket.”
Uploaded on Apr 27, 2011
Leonard Menchiari's adaptation to Aldous Huxley's Brave New World.
Special thanks to Micah Nelson for the hand drawn animated sequence.
Category
Film & Animation
License
Standard YouTube License