Na vest da je predsednik Rusije Vladimir Putin objavio je ranije danas da je u Rusiji registrovana prva vakcina protiv koronavirusa, da ona deluje prilično efikasno i da je prošla sve neophodne provere........

Evo jos jedan profesionalni RusoMrzac koji je placen od zapada, tj. od onih istih koji su nas bombardovali u "Milosrdnom Andjelu", unistili nam industriju, radna mesta i pokupovali u zemlji sve sto je valjalo!!!!!

Direktno.rs11. 08. 2020.17:2121
"Veliki Srbi, hoće li sad brat Putin da vas čipuje"?
Pa šta je sad ovo profesionalni veliko-Srbi, braćo rusofili, teoretičari zavere, desničari svih fela, antivakcinaši, ravnozemljaši i zatucani verski fanatici? Hoće li to sad i brat Putin da vas čipuje, a ne samo zli zapadnjaci i Bil Gejts - naveo je pisac i scenarista Žarko Jokanović, aludirajući na to da je Rusija navodno otkrila vakcinu protiv koronavirusa i da će je Srbi, po svoj prilici, rado prihvatiti za razliku od "zapadnjačkih" kada su se smišljaje razne teorije zavere.
- Ovo je veliki udar za vašu paranoju. Oporavak će biti dug i neizvestan - konstatovao je Jokanović.
Žarko Jokanović,
Podsetimo, predsednik Rusije Vladimir Putin objavio je ranije danas da je u Rusiji registrovana prva vakcina protiv koronavirusa, da ona deluje prilično efikasno i da je prošla sve neophodne provere. - https://direktno.rs/korona/294429/veliki-srbi-hoce-li-sad-brat-putin-da-vas-cipuje.html

Danasnji Komentari na istom sajtu ispod novinskog clanka:

Svetska zdravstvena organizacija se oglasila tim povodom, istakavši da su da su neophodne rigorozne procedure za odobrenje bilo koje vakcine. Mića [neregistrovani]
Poverenjeu
U poslednje 32 godine iz Amerike nije izašla vakcina sa potpunom dokumentacijom o ispravnosti. Da li je ovo dovoljno Jokanović?
-11.08. 2020, 18:33Ime moje [neregistrovani]
Darvinov potomak
Gledajuci njegovu fotografiju vidi se da je volumen njegovog mozga obrnuto proporcionalan zapremini njegovog tela a sto se zapravo moze i potvrditi onim sto je i izgovorio.
- 11.08. 2020, 18:34дрмр [neregistrovani]
.
Нисам припадник ни једне наведене категорије. Питао бих господина којој политичкој групацији је припадао деведесетих и он и његова неталентована супруга, и како је продужио боравак на власти балканском касапину и како је користио имовину комунистичке омладине.
- 11.08. 2020, 18:59Лепи Цане [neregistrovani]
...
Путин неће да вакцинише (нити чипује) ни Русе, пошто вакцинисање у Русији НИЈЕ ОБАВЕЗНО. Ко хоће да се вакцинише својевољно - срећно му било.
- 11.08. 2020, 19:25anonymous [neregistrovani]
Re: Ruski preciscivac vazduha
Na tebi je izgleda dobrano radio ruski prečošćivač motga...
- 11.08. 2020, 20:39kraljevčanin [neregistrovani]
....
Uvek pre rusku vakcinu nego bilo koju drugu.
Što bi nas rusi čipovali???
- 11.08. 2020, 20:56Стојко [neregistrovani]
Баба Росанда
Моја покојна бака Росанда би рекла...Узми мало воде у уста,тад си најпаметнији.
- 11.08. 2020, 21:33Moskva [neregistrovani]
vot eto da
Ruskaia,Pravoslavnaia,Voenaia privivka,samaia ludschaia VAKCINUSHKA dlia Serbov
Da zdravstvuet voenaia VAKCINUSHKA.
- 12.08. 2020, 01:06laki [neregistrovani]
Re: ....
Najpouzdanija je Britanska vakcina sa Harvarda, jer su oni najdalje odmakli u njenom testiranju. Ne znam koliko glup moraš da budeš da poveruješ da je sve u redu sa bilo čijom vakcinom, pa i bratskom ruskom, bez propisanog vremena izdvojenog za njeno testiranje. Zna se sled događaja. Npr. naučnici sa Harvarda su najdalje odmakli u testovima i oni se trenutno nalaze u trećoj etapi testiranja, a posle toga sledi dugi niz meseci i periodična kontrola osoba na kojima se vakcina testira da bi se video koliki je promil neželjenih posledica i kakve sve reakcije na tu vakcinu mogu da budu. Zato su naučnici sa Harvarda i rekli da se gotova i registrovana vakcina protiv COVID19 ne može očekivati pre polovine 2021. godine. Rusi, kao i obično, vole i žele da su u svemu prvi i zato njihovu vakcinu ne želim da primim ni pod raznorazno. Ko želi nek' izvoli i neka im izigrava pokusnog kunića. Želim da primim samo onu vakcinu koju će da primaju i stanovnici EU, a to će, po svemu sudeći, biti ona sa Harvarda, nažalost tek za otprilike godinu dana. Ne sumnjam da će ovaj naš žvalavi psihopata pokušati da poturi deo svog naroda da se na njemu testiraju neprovereni serumi i potencijalni otrovi, ali to mu neće proći baš kao ni pokušaj poslednjeg policijskog časa. Za takva sranja neka potura svoju porodicu, svoju decu, ženu, brata i roditelje. Od mene KUŠ!
- 12.08. 2020, 04:26Mile [neregistrovani]
Re: Bravo, Žarko!

Ma,naravno,cim je bio svojevremeno jedan od stubova Nove Demokratije,stranke Dusana Mihajlovica,to otprilike podrazumeva sve ostalo sto proizilazi iz vaseg teksta. Ipak,bolji je od mnogih iz politicke branse. Sto se tice ovog njegovog posta u vezi ruske vakcine,apsolutno je preterao,velika vecina nas nije protiv vakcina,ali vremena nisu kao sto su bila,a ni Rusi nisu kao nasi 'prijatelji' sa zapada,to pogotovo.Dakle,sto se mene tice,ako procenim da mi treba bice sa istoka a ne sa zapada,ma sta god ko mislio ili pisao,kao Milicin suprug.
- 12.08. 2020, 07:07anonymous [neregistrovani]
Re: Re: ....
Tako je, ali mislim da će se davati vakcina koju država nabavi, a to će da bude ruska. Rusi su odgovorni i dobri u nauci, ali čudno da pored Putina nije stajao tim koji je izradio vakcinu. Ko ima prvi vakcinu taj će da dominira svetom. Možda su Rusi sve već ispitali na svom narodu, ko zna šta je u Sibiru!
- 12.08. 2020, 07:35Aleksandar [neregistrovani]
Kako te nije sramota Scenaristo,

Ti primi koju god vakcinu hoćeš. A isto tako ostavi nas antivaksere, rusofile, veliko Srbe i desnicare svih fela da primimo vakcinu koju mi hocemo... vidis mi nemamo problem da ti ako bas zelis primis kinesku ili mozda da ti licno soros i bil gejts ili ko god daju vakcinu. Vidis nama to nije problem. A ti lepo ako ne volis deo ovog naroda koji pre veruje rusiji, slobodno se seli u lepu njihovu ili gde god zelis. Sram te bilo za ovakvu objavu.

-Pa neka Torlak (sadasnji Novartis) sprovede detaljnu proveru te vakcine na: sastojke, neurotoksicnog Aluminijuma i Zive, celije matericne posteljice, celije GMO zivotinja, i niz drugih gadosti...... pa ako su "free" od tih zagadjenja, mozda ce biti bolja za bracu Srbe....razmislite sta vam je valja ciniti, stvarno nije tesko, samo ukljucite mozak i prestanite biti lakoverni i voleti  one koji vam seme unistavaju!!!!

https://www.soundchoice.org/open-letter-to-legislators/

Pre nego vakcinisete svoje unuke, procitajte ovo!!!!! OPEN LETTER FROM DR. THERESA DEISHER TO LEGISLATORS REGARDING FETAL CELL DNA IN VACCINES
Posted on May 8, 2019
OPEN LETTER TO LEGISLATORS REGARDING FETAL CELL DNA IN VACCINES

April 8, 2019

My name is Dr. Theresa Deisher. I am Founder and Lead Scientist at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, whose mission is to educate the public about vaccine safety, as well as to pressure manufacturers to provide better and safer vaccines for the public. I obtained my doctorate from Stanford University in Molecular and Cellular Physiology in 1990 and completed my post-doctoral work at the University of Washington. My career has been spent in the commercial biotechnology industry, and I have done work from basic biological and drug discovery through clinical development. I am writing regarding unrefuted scientific facts about fetal DNA contaminants in the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine, which must be made known to lawmakers and the public.

Merck’s MMR II vaccine (as well as the chickenpox, Pentacel ,and all Hep-A containing vaccines) is manufactured using human fetal cell lines and are heavily contaminated with human fetal DNA from the production process. Levels in our children can reach up to 5 ng/ml after vaccination, depending on the age, weight and blood volume of the child. That level is known to activate Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), which can cause autoimmune attacks.

To illustrate the autoimmune capability of very small amounts of fetal DNA, consider this: labor is triggered by fetal DNA from the baby that builds up in the mother’s bloodstream, triggering a massive immune rejection of the baby. This is labor.

It works like this: fetal DNA fragments[i] from a baby with about 300 base pairs in length are found in a pregnant mother’s serum. When they reach between 0.46– 5.08 ng/mL, they trigger labor via the TLR9 mechanism[ii]. The corresponding blood levels are 0.22 ng/ml and 3.12 ng/ml. The fetal DNA levels in a child after being injected with fetal-manufactured vaccines reach the same level that triggers autoimmune rejection of baby by mother.

Anyone who says that the fetal DNA contaminating our vaccines is harmless either does not know anything about immunity and Toll- like receptors or they are not telling the truth.

If fetal DNA can trigger labor (a naturally desired autoimmune reaction), then those same levels in vaccines can trigger autoimmunity in a child. Fragmented fetal DNA contained in vaccines is of similar size, ~215 base pairs.[iii]

This is direct biological evidence that fetal DNA contaminants in vaccines are not in low innocuous amounts. They are a very strong proinflammatory trigger.

Administration of fragments of human fetal (primitive) non-self DNA to a child could generate an immune response that would also cross-react with the child’s own DNA, since the contaminating DNA could have sections of overlap very similar to the child’s own DNA.

Children with autistic disorder have antibodies against human DNA in their circulation that non- autistic children do not have. These antibodies may be involved in autoimmune attacks in autistic children.[iv]

Duke University demonstrated in a recently conducted study that significant improvements in behavior were observed when children with autism spectrum disorder were treated with their own banked autologous cord blood[v]. This treatment clearly shows that most children with autism are not born with it since genetic diseases like Down syndrome or muscular fibrosis cannot be treated with autologous stem cells. Therefore, an environmental trigger, or triggers, introduced to the world around 1980 when autism first began to rise, must be identified and eliminated or reduced in the environment.

Strong change-point correlation exists between rising autism rates and the vaccine manufacturing switch from animal-derived cell lines for rubella vaccine to human aborted cell lines in the late 70s[vi].
The earliest change point for Autistic Disorder (AD) birth year was identified for 1981 for California and U.S. data, preceded by a switch in the manufacturing process:
In January 1979, the FDA approved the manufacturing switch for the rubella virus from animal based (high passage virus, HPV-77, grown e.g. in duck embryo cells) to the human fetal cell line WI-38 using the RA27/3 virus strain[vii]. Both the newly approved monovalent rubella vaccine and a trivalent mumps, measles and rubella vaccine utilize the WI-38 fetal cell line for manufacturing of the rubella vaccine portion.
Prior to 1980, autism spectrum disorder was a very rare, almost unknown disease. According to the figures of the CDC, the rate of autism in 2014 was 1 in 59 children , a very steep increase since just 2000, when it was 1 in 150. CDC: “The total costs per year for children with ASD in the United States were estimated to be between $11.5 billion – $60.9 billion (2011 US dollars)[viii].”
Recently, duplications and de novo deletions have been recognized in up to 10% of simplex autism spectrum disorders, corroborating environmental triggers on the genetics of autism spectrum disorders[ix].
The rubella portion of the MMR vaccine contains human derived fetal DNA contaminants of about 175 ngs, more than 10x over the recommended WHO threshold of 10 ng per vaccine dose[x].
No other drug on the market would receive FDA approval without thorough toxicity profiling (FDA follows international ICH guidelines) -> this was never conducted by the pharmaceutical industry for the DNA contamination in the MMR vaccine.

Vaccines produced with human fetal cell lines contain cell debris and contaminating
residual human DNA, which cannot be fully eliminated during the downstream purification process of the virus[xi]. Moreover, DNA is not only characterized by its sequence (ATCG), but also by its epigenetic modification (e.g. DNA methylation pattern etc.). This decoration is highly species specific, which is why non-human DNA will be eliminated through activation of TLR9 and consequent antibody production against the non-human DNA, while this is not necessarily the case with fetal human DNA.
Injecting our children with human fetal DNA contaminants bears the risk of causing two well-established pathologies:

1) Insertional mutagenesis: fetal human DNA incorporates into the child’s DNA causing mutations. Gene therapy using small fragment homologous recombination has demonstrated that as low as 1.9 ng/ml of DNA fragments results in insertion into the genome of stem cells in 100% of mice injected[xii]. The levels of human fetal DNA fragments in our children after vaccination with MMR, Varivax (chickenpox) or Hepatitis A containing vaccines reach levels beyond 1.9 ng/ml.
2) Autoimmune disease: fetal human DNA triggers a child’s immune system to attack his/her own body.

An additional concern: retrovirus contamination.

Human endogenous retrovirus K (HERVK) is a contaminant in the measles/mumps/rubella vaccine[xiii].

HERVK can be reactivated in humans[xiv]. It codes for a protein (integrase) specialized in integrating DNA into the human genome.
Several autoimmune diseases have been associated with HERVK activity[xv].
It is also in the same family of retroviruses as the MMLV virus used in a gene therapy trial, in which inappropriate gene insertion (insertional mutagenesis) led to subsequent additional somatic mutations and cancer in 4 of 9 young boys[xvi].
It is therefore possible that the HERVK gene fragment present in the MMR vaccine is active, codes for the integrase or the envelope protein, and thus has the potential to induce gene insertion, fostering insertional mutagenesis and autoimmunity.
The presence of both the high level contaminating fetal DNA as well as the HERVK contamination in the MMR vaccine is an unstudied risk with huge implications and dangers for individual and public health.

Solution: Pressure manufacturers to switch back to animal cell line derived rubella vaccines as was successfully done in Japan:

Based on Takahashi strains of live attenuated rubella virus, produced on rabbit kidney cells. A single dose of this vaccine has been recently proven to retain immunity for at least 10 years when rubella was under regional control[xvii].
Split MMR vaccine into three individually offered options as done in Japan.
The MMR vaccine manufacturing process needs to be changed to address and eliminate the above risks for the public.

Thank you for your consideration. I will be happy to address any questions you may have concerning the above.

Sincerely,

Theresa A. Deisher, Ph.D.

END NOTES

[i] Lo et al. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Apr;62(4):768-75

[ii] Enninga et al. Front Immunol. 2015 Aug 26;6:424

[iii] Deisher et al. Issues Law Med. 2015 Spring;30(1):47-70

[iv] Mostafa et al. 2014, J Neuroimmunol , Vol. 272, pp. 94–98; Mostafa et al. 2015, J Neuroimmunol , Vol. 280, pp. 16–20

[v] Dawson et al. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017 May;6(5):1332-1339

[vi] Deisher et al. Issues Law Med, 2015 Vol. 30, pp. 25-46

[vii] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/rubella.html; Plotkin, SA. 2006, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Vol. 43, pp. S164–168;

[viii] https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html

[ix] Sebat et al. 2007, Science., Vol. 316, pp. 445-449; Sanders et al. 2011, Neuron, Vol. 70, pp. 863-885

[x] Series, WHO Technical Report. WHO EXPERT COMMITTEE ON BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION 941; Deisher et al. Issues Law Med. 2015 Spring;30(1):47-70

[xi] Kramberger et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(4):1010-21.

[xii] McNeer, N A et al. “Systemic delivery of triplex-forming PNA and donor DNA by nanoparticles mediates site-specific genome editing of human hematopoietic cells in vivo.” Gene therapy vol. 20,6 (2012): 658-69. doi:10.1038/gt.2012.82

[xiii] Victoria et al. J Virol. 2010, Vol. 84, pp. 6033-6040

[xiv] Lee et al. PLoS Pathog. 2007 3(1):e10; Dewannieux et al. Biologicals, Vol. 38, pp. 366-70

[xv] Taietal.9,Nov2008, Mult Scler, Vol. 14, pp. 1175-80; Dickerson et al. 2008, Schizophr Res. 2008 Sep;104(1-3):121-6, Vol. 104, pp. 121-6

[xvi] Hacein-Bey-Abina et al. J Clin Invest. 2008 Sep;118(9):3132-42

[xvii] Jpn J Infect Dis. 2016 May 20;69(3):221-3

1749 Dexter Ave N
Seattle, WA 98109
Contact Us
(206) 906-9922

https://www.soundchoice.org/open-letter-to-legislators/

Jan 11, 2019 Vaccine update :  http://www.eduzdravlje.com/431160967

Glumac Robert DeNiro, prica o filmu "vaxxed" i njegovom 18 g. sinu koji je autistican, i 

The Irrefutable Argument Against Vaccine Safety - with Author Del Bigtree - (Vaxxed)......1:35:44 min.

US Government Spends $5.7 Million To Prepare The Sterilization Of US Children; 11:50 min.

https://www.brighteon.com/5836497672001

InfoWars - Alex Jones Channel

Published: 3 months ago

 A taxpayer-funded study on the effects of hormone blockers on children was released by the US government. Alex Breaks explains this is part of the globalist agenda to reduce the population.

Ingold Inglorion • 3 months ago

The social engineering being subjected on CHILDREN is quite plainly, evil. There is no other word for it. Evil. Not only is liberalism a mental disorder, but it promotes mental disorders in children openly.

Mad Scientists Spike Vaccines To Decide Who Lives And Who Dies; 45:39 min.

https://www.brighteon.com/5979192827001

- Christa • 17 hours ago

My grandfather passed away in 2016 from cancer. He was exposed to uranium at his job. My grandmother died from cancer a couple of years before he was diagnosed. I suspect she was also exposed, by washing his clothes that he wore home from work. 
After he died, I have dreamt of him several times. He talks to me in the dreams, tells me things. In one of the dreams, a few months ago, I was walking with him, in his front yard, and we were talking. He said to me 'at this point, anyone who is not prepared is a fool'. The next thing that happened was, we were sitting in his house. He was sitting in a chair and he said to me 'it could be within days, or it could be awhile longer'. I answered him by saying 'I don't know Papaw, they are here, so it must be time'. Then I woke from the dream.

- Jonathan Bourdon • 21 hours ago

Not to mention the flu vaccines and others vaccines embedded into bugs in the summer. What else could it be used to spread?

Full Show – Thousands Of U.S. Children Killed By Polio Vaccine / Explosive Gavin McInnes Interview – 12/13/2018; 2:52:25 min.

https://www.brighteon.com/5979370522001

-InfoWars Recast • 12 hours ago

They're handing out condoms to 7 year old boys because of the "secret" 
epidemic of HIV/AIDS rampant with pedos, which means it's going 
mainstream to the spouses and girlfriends as well. Throwing feces and 
urine at people is assault and spreads disease (the primary reason it's 
assault). Why aren't they being arrested? Where's the wonderful 
County/State Health Dept or Centers for Disease Control?

- Terry Bogard • 12 hours ago

more information about Polio Vaccine! lesson learned people never vaccine your kids or anyone you love in your family. Donald Trump should be quick to fix this and find the treason people that is behind this vaccine... "I bet it's Bill Gate". Doctor that do this kind of stuff to people should be punish.

- InfoWars Recast • 12 hours ago

They're handing out condoms to 7 year old boys because of the "secret" epidemic of HIV/AIDS rampant with pedos, which means it's going mainstream to the spouses and girlfriends as well. Throwing feces and urine at people is assault and spreads disease (the primary reason it's assault). Why aren't they being arrested? Where's the wonderful County/State Health Dept or Centers for Disease Control?

- 

https://www.infowars.com/report-us-payouts-for-vaccine-injuries-deaths-now-over-4bn/

REPORT: US PAYOUTS FOR VACCINE INJURIES, DEATHS NOW OVER $4BN

Payouts contradict official claims that all vaccines are safe

Children's Health Defense - NOVEMBER 20, 2018 

The Health Resources & Services Administration just released new dollar figures reflecting payouts from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

The payouts for vaccine injuries just went past the whopping $4 billion mark. Using the government’s own conclusion that only 1% of all vaccine injuries are reported, the $4 billion is just the tip of the iceberg.

Despite assurances from CDC and our Federal agencies that all vaccines are safe, the payouts say otherwise. Vaccine injuries can and do happen—to previously healthy children and adults. Consumers deserve to know the facts about the full range of vaccine risks. 

In most public health communications about vaccination, officials gloss over vaccine risks, dismissing any possible “side effects” as mild. However, vaccination programs have always resulted in more serious vaccine injuries for some. In the 1970s and early 1980s, for example, the diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) vaccine and its whole-cell pertussis component had chalked up so much vaccine damage that a television documentary likened receiving a DPT shot to playing “vaccine roulette.”

After the DPT debacle began attracting widespread attention, vaccine manufacturers started pressuring Congress for protection from vaccine injury lawsuits. Congress obliged. In 1986, President Reagan signed into existence a radical piece of legislation—the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA)—which launched what the Act described as an “alternative remedy to judicial action for specified vaccine-related injuries.” A key component of the legislation involved creating the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), which was given responsibility for deciding (through the workings of a special “vaccine court”) whether specific injuries and individuals would be eligible for financial compensation.

Over the vaccine court’s 30-year history, individuals and families have filed over 20,000 petitions for vaccine injury compensation. This month, even as 12% of filed petitions remained unadjudicated, the payouts crossed over the $4 billion threshold. This amount was awarded in response to barely a third (31% or 6,276) of the filed petitions. There is no telling how much more money the taxpayer-funded program might have shelled out if the court had not chosen to dismiss the remaining petitions (56%)—possibly doing so fraudulently in at least some cases.

Running the Gauntlet

Over the three decades, despite the stated intent to furnish an “accessible and efficient forum for individuals found to be injured by certain vaccines,” the NVICP has devolved into a protracted and litigious David-versus-Goliath battleground. The vaccine court, in actuality, is “not a court at all but…a consumer-funded government claims program that uses…employees of Health and Human Services (HHS), rather than judges to make decisions on compensation.” While government-funded Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers vigorously represent and defend the interests of HHS and vaccine manufacturers, the consumer-unfriendly system forces the vaccine-injured to meet an exceptionally high burden of proof. For dismissed claims, there is no assurance that the program will even cover attorneys’ fees and costs.

Children’s Health Defense recently called attention to a glaring example of the NVICP’s pro-industry and anti-vaccine-injured bias. In 2007 and 2008, DOJ attorneys exhibited “highly unethical and appallingly consequential official misconduct” during an Omnibus Autism Proceeding (OAP) orchestrated to determine the fate of 5,400 families who had filed claims for vaccine-induced autism. The potential value of the claims exceeded $100 billion—an amount that “would have bankrupted the [compensation] program many times over.” HHS’s Department of Justice lawyers, “under pressure” to deprive petitioners of their rightful relief, successfully achieved that aim through allegedly fraudulent means. In September 2018, Children’s Health Defense Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Rolf Hazlehurst (parent of one of the vaccine-injured children involved in the OAP) requested that the DOJ Inspector General and Congress investigate this fraud and obstruction of justice by HHS and DOJ officials.

Individuals who file claims with VICP must meet specific “medical criteria” and are out of luck unless their illness, disability, injury or condition is covered in the NVICP’s Vaccine Injury Tableand manifests within a specified time frame. As an illustration of the difficulties that NVICP petitioners may encounter, consider someone who experiences myocarditis (heart inflammation) following vaccination. A 2018 article in BMJ Case Reports recently observed that myocarditis is one of “the more serious vaccine-related sequela” and “has been reported following many different vaccines.”

Another recent article in a European medical journal describes post-vaccination reports of myopericarditis (inflammation of both the pericardium and the heart muscle) and other autoimmune disorders and offers two extremely plausible mechanisms “by which vaccines can cause autoimmune reactions.” In the Vaccine Injury Table, however, the only place where cardiac symptoms are mentioned is in connection with anaphylaxis—with the table’s notes indicating that “there are no specific pathological findings to confirm a diagnosis of anaphylaxis”—and most autoimmune illnesses are also conspicuously absent.

Tip of the Iceberg

By anyone’s accounting, the $4 billion paid out to date by the NVICP is an attention-getting amount of money. However, that amount pales in comparison to the billions of dollars’ worth of autism claims that the vaccine court unfairly dismissed. According to HHS, moreover, “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported,” and studies confirm that many health providers are unfamiliar with the system for reporting vaccine injuries. The shocking underreporting of vaccine injuries also fails to account for the fact that one in six individuals who experience an “adverse event following immunization” (AEFI) have a recurrence with subsequent vaccination, often rated as “more severe than the initial AEFI.” If even a small percentage of these unreported and recurrent vaccine injuries were brought forward for compensation, the entire NVICP house of cards—and the CDC’s deceptive claims of unassailable vaccine safety—would crumble.

A Gold Rush: Liability Protection Encourages More Vaccines

Instead, whether intended or not, the end result of the 1986 Act and the NVICP has been to create a “gold rush” environment that encourages manufacturers to develop even more vaccines, while conveniently exempting them from liability for the injuries and deaths that result from their powerful immune-system-altering products. With no incentive to make vaccines safe and a large and lucrative market guaranteed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s childhood vaccine schedule—as well as a growing effort to foist unnecessary and dangerous vaccines on adults—vaccine manufacturers appear to have it made. The public and vaccine safety advocates must continue to remind the government that the approximately 6,300 claims that have been compensated over the NVICP’s 30-year history represent the very tip of the iceberg.

The viewpoints expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Infowars.

https://www.infowars.com/report-same-people-behind-failed-agent-orange-study-in-charge-of-vaccine-safety-at-cdc/

REPORT: SAME PEOPLE BEHIND FAILED AGENT ORANGE STUDY IN CHARGE OF VACCINE SAFETY AT CDC

History repeats itself with the same perpetrators

James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D | World Mercury Project - FEBRUARY 27, 2018 

IMAGE CREDITS: BRIAN K. GRIGSBY / WIKIMEDIA COMMONS.

When historians write about the Vaccine Decades (1976–2020), there are two names that will live in infamy: Dr. Frank DeStefano, and Dr. Coleen Boyle.

In the 1980s, Congress mandated Agent Orange studies. Frank and Coleen ended the studies two years early, ensuring that “no link” would be found between illnesses being reported by injured veterans and dioxin. The early termination of the study allowed the US Department of Veterans Affairs to deny any connection between Agent Orange and medical problems, preventing veterans and their families from qualifying for compensations. Here’s your hurt, what’s your hurry. The Boyle/Destefano team bamboozle was outed by Admiral Zumwalt who went to the President and laid out the science in a classified report (now declassified):

“Without exception, the experts who reviewed the work of the Advisory Committee disagreed with its findings and further questioned the validity of the Advisory Committee’s review of studies on non — Hodgkin’s lymphomas .”

“a decision which should have been based on scientific data was reduced to vague impressions”

[One impartial review team’s results were] “a stunning indictment of the Advisory Committee’s scientific interpretation and policy judgments”

“1987 Followup Examination Results,” described statistically significant increases in health problems among Ranch Handers including all cancers”

“The work of the Veterans’ Advisory Committee on Environmental Hazards, as documented in their November 2, 1989 transcript, has little or no scientific merit, and should not serve as a basis for compensation or regulatory decisions of any sort.”

“the Air Force could just as easily have concluded that the health problems associated with the Ranch Handers were not necessarily related to eating beer nuts.”

“Shamefully, the deception, fraud and political interference that has characterized government-sponsored studies on the health effects of exposure to Agent Orange and/or dioxin has not escaped studies ostensibly conducted by independent reviewers, a factor that has only further compounded the erroneous conclusions reached by the government.”

The Zumwalt report concluded:

“It can, in my judgment, be concluded, with a very high degree of confidence, that it is at least as likely as not that the following are caused in humans by exposure to TCDD: non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, chloracne and other skin disorders, lip cancer, bone cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, birth defects, skin cancer, lung cancer, porphyria cutanea tarda and other liver disorders, Hodgkin’s disease, hematopoietic diseases, multiple myeloma, neurological defects and auto-immune diseases and disorders.

In addition, I am most comfortable in concluding that it is at least as likely as not that liver cancer, nasal/pharyngeal/esophageal cancers, leukemia, malignant melanoma, kidney cancer, testicular cancer, pancreatic cancer, stomach cancer, prostate cancer, colon cancer, brain cancer, psychosocial effects, and gastrointestinal disease are service– connected..”

President Clinton called Admiral Zumwalt “the conscience of the US Navy”. In fact, Zumwalt’s report is used by veterans seeking compensation. Zumwalt’s son was exposed to Agent Orange and died of lymphoma in 1988.

Boyle and Destefano’s Role in Agent Orange Pseudoscience

The CDC study (which lists no authors) that was published did not study any specific mechanism by which Agent Orange might have caused health issues in veterans. Instead, it studied dioxin levels in Vietnam veterans compared to non-Vietnam veterans. The 646 Vietnam veterans studied by CDC who all served in units that were most likely exposed, did not have elevated levels of dioxin as compared to non-Vietnam veterans. This retrospective study seeking differences of levels of dioxin nearly two decades after exposure is a type of epidemiologic study with only a long shot at success. The aims of the study were to determine whether military records could be “used to identify US Army Vietnam veterans who were likely to be exposed to the herbicide Agent Orange”.

Dioxin is stored in fat. The study measured dioxin levels in serum. Given the CDC’s failure to detect evidence for increased exposure in the 1980s, the ill-posed study was initially used as justification for no further science on the possible effects of exposure.

The analysis and conclusions were also blasted by a Congressional Report:

Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee, US House of Representatives: The Agent Orange Coverup: A Case of Flawed Science and Political Manipulation. 101st Congress, 2d Session, House Report №101–672. Washington, DC: Govt Printing Office, 1990.

What else has the Destefano/Boyle team failed to detect?

Under their watch, studies conducted ostensibly to test the hypothesis of a link between vaccines and autism have consistently failed to detect any association. Are they competent enough, given the debacle of their failed study in 1988, to run the hopefully entitled “Immunization Safety Office” (which ignores the differences between Vaccination and Immunization) and the “National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities”?

It is my professional opinion that no, neither of these individuals is sufficiently competent to be involved in vaccine safety science and interpretation of studies.

Further, it is my professional opinion that both are guilty of intentional and scientific fraud, perpetuated repeatedly and consistently, to hide the association between vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders.

(1) Boyle informed Congress that no studies have been conducted that compares the rates of autism in vaccinated and unvaccinated Americans. Yet the CDC website clearly reads “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism”. How could any competent scientist make such as stunning conclusion when the science required to answer the question has not been conducted?

Dr. Coleen Boyle testified to Congress that no science exists that shows vaccines do not cause autism, yet the CDC website still proclaims that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism”.

(2) Destefano removed results showing increased risk of autism from on-time MMR prior to presenting to the Institutes of Medicine, and prior to publishing the fraudulent study known as “Destefano et al., 2004”. Two subgroups are missing: African American boys, and isolated autism. The latter group had increased risk, included boys and girls from any race, who had no other conditions other than autism. That means “anyone”.

Dr. William Thompson confessed his role in allowing false reports to be published both in audio recordings to Dr. Brian Hooker, and in statements from his lawyers. He was put on leave after reporting his concerns to then CDC Director Julie Gerberding, who put him on suspension for breaking rank. Dr. Walter Orenstein is also implicated in the cover-ups. See vaxxedthemovie.com and youtube.com/watch?v=hlxdWfTLHH0

(3) Boyle personally attempted to reconfigure the study design of that same study in an attempt to make the association of on-time MMR and autism go away. The team played with study design after knowing the increased risk of autism had been found, which is not allowed in objective research. They worked very hard to attempt to make the association go away. They play games with birth certificates and age-group definitions. Nothing worked. So they simply removed the results:

(4) DeStefano admitted to journalist Sharyl Attkisson that (a) they removed the results because they did not believe them, and (b) that vaccines may be responsible for autism in susceptible individuals (See Sharyl Attkisson’s capture and hear the confession to her here).

Dr. Frank DeStefano’s career exemplifies a list of failures to detect anything wrong with vaccines.

“I guess, that, that is a possibility,” said DeStefano. “It’s hard to predict who those children might be, but certainly, individual cases can be studied to look at those possibilities.”

(5) DeStefano has participated in other publications in which he outlines how association studies should be conducted. He says that covariates must be “corrected for”, and that finding covariates that cause associations between vaccination and adverse events to disappear after the association is first found and then lost due to such corrections somehow exonerates vaccines. This is poppycock. If birth weight, mother’s age, mother’s income, gestational age, etc. cause a loss of significance of vaccination status, the correct model selection procedure is to look for interactions between vaccines and the covariates — especially because they can be functionally related to adverse events from vaccines. If the interaction terms are significant (which could easily be, given that mother’s income, age, gestational age, and birthweight may all correlate to nutritional status), the result is pointing to covariates that make vaccination an increased risk. This is elementary linear modeling, and any studies that “correct for” covariates without also studying, and reporting, the interaction terms is hiding the effects of vaccines interacting with other variables.

Given these realities and the fact that this and other equally damning information has been available for at least three years, it simply is unconscionable that Destefano and Boyle remain in their positions at the CDC. We cannot have incompetent individuals unable to conduct and properly interpret science standing in the way of helping America deal with the explosion of neurodevelopmental disorders — and the full suite of consequences currently being experienced in schools and homes all around the country.

Cowardice at CDC is Not Leadership with Accountability

These people are not only incompetent. They are cowards. Here, we learn from Dr. Thompson that Coleen Boyle refused to ever testify to Congress again. CDC abdicated its responsibility to account for their policies:

(recorded May 24, 2014) Page 25 —

Dr. Thompson: Well let me tell you something really interesting I learned about this week so in the midst of this. Ya know, I was yelling at Marshalyn this week, I mean, Marshalyn and I were . . . WHOOOO! I was, it was suggested I resign, and um it’s like that type of stuff going on right now. The whole place is a big pressure cooker . . . So I don’t know if you know this. The CDC was invited to testify (before Congress) and they declined, so this is . . .

Dr. Hooker: Really?

Dr. Thompson: Yeah, and Marshalyn said she’s been offered to testify and said she won’t. Coleen (Boyle) said she’s been offered to testify and Coleen said that she would never go and testify again.

May 20, 2014 — the hearing which Thompson is talking about and Boyle and CDC declined to attend:

Examining the Federal Response to Autism Spectrum Disorders (5/20/2014)

The rate of ASDs is now 1 in 36. Frank, Coleen, you can stop the denialism. It’s over. And you can help America. How? Please resign, and in your letters of resignation, provide a full confession, like Dr. William Thompson has, and let someone capable try to clean up the mess you’ve made.

Vaccines can cause autism in some people, and, from the looks of things, in many people, and you know it. You failed to adjust the schedule, or offer meaningful public health advice in terms of vaccine safety. Your deeds are having profound effects on society, which are difficult to grasp:

• Half of children have a mental illness in the US.
• Teachers cannot teach children due to behavioral anomalies.
• Violence in schools is causing special education teachers to quit in schools across the country.
• Property taxes are going up as special education costs skyrocket.
• Calm rooms are being built in schools, and wobble chairs to allow fidgeting.
• Rates of schizophrenia are increasing among 20– 30-year-olds.
• High levels of amyloid are found in the brains of kids with severe autism.
• High levels of aluminum are found in people with autism.
• Artificial immunization programs are failing as parents abandon them due to first-hand experience with neurological and immunological adverse events.
• Exemptions to vaccine mandates are increasingly under fire.

There are desperate attempts ongoing now to convince the increasingly vaccine injured public that vaccine injuries are rare, to blame ASD on stress in the home, and most recently on alcohol use during pregnancy. Why now, all of sudden, can such association be detected? Where were these studies of environmental exposures conducted by CDC after 1988?

There were none. CDC (i.e., Boyle, Destefano) had a suspicious lack of curiosity of what DID cause autism. CDC convinced IOM to say that no more studies were needed.

Sound familiar?

CDC failed to detect association, and called for no more science. Just like Agent Orange.

Studies of genetics have revealed 850 genes associated with autism, but no single gene explains more than 1% of ASD. No studies have looked for genetic/vaccine interactions — and they must be conducted to fill in the gap. “No studies” does not mean “negative evidence.” It means “we need more science.”

The future is now. Vaccines can no longer be said to be “safe” and effective. Other science has progressed, independent of CDC, and the cat is out of the bag.

History will recall the names Destefano, Boyle, Orenstein, Gerberding — and Thompson. There are others. History has shown us that propaganda has never been successful in propping up a regime founded on fraud.

It’s time for Vaccine Safety Science Reform at the CDC, and across the United States.

First, we need competence.

https://www.infowars.com/report-same-people-behind-failed-agent-orange-study-in-charge-of-vaccine-safety-at-cdc/